Are Consumers Getting Mixed Messages About Linux Netbooks?

by Kristin Shoemaker - Nov. 09, 2008Comments (5)

Recently, there's been a lot of noise regarding Linux netbooks -- from how well the devices have sold to the return rates. Sam mentioned in a post that reasonable expectations need to be set for netbooks.

I agree with Sam on this point (which applies to more than netbooks, when it's fully considered). These machines are designed for basic tasks, not to serve as a complete office substitute when traveling.

In the last few days, I've begun to wonder if Linux based netbooks are having to fight another battle -- messages from the media and retailers seem at odds.

There it is again: the "Linux is intimidating" argument. Truthfully, this argument doesn't always bother me, because any new operating system can be intimidating. Depending on your familiarity with computers in general, and how adventurous you are with technology, it can be (without a doubt) intimidating.

This statement irks me when it is used to describe the EeePC Xandros configuration. When I purchased my Eee, the first thing I did was enable the advanced desktop settings. I have used Linux for many years, so this isn't too surprising. However, the Easy Mode desktop, whether the layout annoys or helps you, is nothing if not straightforward. The icons and applications located under their respective "purpose" tabs do what they claim to, and because it is a different procedure to "get under the hood" on the Eee, new users don't have to live in fear that mis-pressed key combinations will activate some secret Linux "self-destruct" sequence.

It seems that as some newer Linux users get their sea legs on the Eee, they make the move to the advanced desktop. I saw this more often on dedicated Eee forums than I expected. The main point is that they don't have to -- the machine works out of the box without a fuss.

Unfortunately, (and my apologies to Hiawatha Bray at the Boston Globe for singling his piece out, as he's by no means the first or only tech reporter to say this) it seems no matter how simply the interface is presented, the fact that it's Linux underneath deems the whole device as intimidating (or difficult, or user-unfriendly). The consumer needs to know what's powering the computer, surely. I need to know when I am buying a smart phone if it's running Android, or Windows Mobile, or Palm. However, it's more relevant to what I need the device to do than if I'll be able to figure out how to use it.

I know there have to be some who have written about netbooks that have at least seen the Xandros Easy Mode interface. Indeed, some of the Linux netbook return rates were attributed to these devices being purchased without the consumer being able to test drive the device.

Two days ago, I came across an end cap display at a major US department store adorned with two EeePCs (the smaller 701 series that come with Xandros pre-installed), and a good deal of information as to what these strange little creatures were. The screens were covered with a sticker illustrating the Easy Mode layout. It wouldn't have been my preference for showing people what's there, and how it all works, but it clearly illustrated the idea that the machine isn't threatening, intimidating or difficult to use.

The actual presentation of this netbook may jar with what consumers have read, but seeing is believing. Perhaps more visibility of these netbooks -- and not just the Linux versions -- will give those considering a netbook more information to find the right model for them (and whether a netbook will meet their needs in the first place).



Jesse Babson uses OStatic to support Open Source, ask and answer questions and stay informed. What about you?



5 Comments
 

You appear to be forgetting who spent half a billion dollars this year SO FAR on advertising at most of these media sites. One clue: it wasn't any Linux vendor.


0 Votes

While I agree that a netbook isn't designed to function as an office substitute (light hardware), the greater performance when loaded with Linux makes these much closer to a suitable mobile alternative than when bogged down by Win.


Regarding above user:

I've had no issues with my Eee 701 for wireless networking (any encryption, works like a champ), but I have had issues on some WinXP systems (WPA2 on Dell Inspiron). Strangely, the linux drivers for the adapter in question was more capable than the Win driver (dual boot: worked with linux, couldn't connect with WinXP). Network config can be very flaky at times, especially with Win (delete and start over).


Yahoo messenger is only available in Win version (ask Yahoo for a linux version, or try WINE), and it doesn't support as many networks as Pidgin (which connects to Yahoo (and ~10 other chat networks) and was already installed in Xandros). I can chat with Yahoo IM users well on my Eee.


Flash works great on the Eee, but some sites require the latest update, and you'd have to apply this, just as on a Win system.


0 Votes

I can only recommend Pidgin as a universal messenger. It connects to all IM networks there are and gives you always the same standard interface. Yahoo, MSN, ICQ, AIM or whateveryouknow all have different interfaces, different sets of features (some lack basic ones) and when they do an upgrade, the love to change everything around. Pidgin is the one for all. It might not be as easy as yahoo, when you are used to yahoo, since you have to create an account in it, but if you are using more than one messenger, it is really much easier.


Videocalling and stuff like this is not possible on a netbook at any rate, so these feature requests are for the next netbooks that are more powerful or a full fledged Laptop. I understand that people want their laptops to be small and light (that is why the ee is taking off so strong) but it comes at reduced power and capabilities, even when you run XP on it.

I guess we should all eagerly await the arrival of Ubuntu mobile, which will be much more useful than the stuff Asus installs currently. No OEM has really a clue about how to do an OS or distro and Asus is not an exception.


If I buy an ee, I will want to install software the way I can do it on Ubuntu and Debian, with just a few clicks and now downloading or hanging around on some websites, trying to figure out which .exe you have to get like you are forced to on Windows.


Ever tried to install several programs at once in Windows? In Linux, you see users pick and choose from what is available.. "hmm, and this one and this one and this one..." and then download, install it, configure it automatically, with just one click. No silly "where do you want it installed?" questions. It is clear where a thing should be installed, at least on any Linux system.

To say it short: users love this, since it is less fussy and much more easy than in Windows. So easy in fact, that they don't get at first how this can exist at all, since they have never seen it on Windows.


Markus


0 Votes

I can only recommend Pidgin as a universal messenger. It connects to all IM networks there are and gives you always the same standard interface. Yahoo, MSN, ICQ, AIM or whateveryouknow all have different interfaces, different sets of features (some lack basic ones) and when they do an upgrade, the love to change everything around. Pidgin is the one for all. It might not be as easy as yahoo, when you are used to yahoo, since you have to create an account in it, but if you are using more than one messenger, it is really much easier.


Videocalling and stuff like this is not possible on a netbook at any rate, so these feature requests are for the next netbooks that are more powerful or a full fledged Laptop. I understand that people want their laptops to be small and light (that is why the ee is taking off so strong) but it comes at reduced power and capabilities, even when you run XP on it.

I guess we should all eagerly await the arrival of Ubuntu mobile, which will be much more useful than the stuff Asus installs currently. No OEM has really a clue about how to do an OS or distro and Asus is not an exception.


If I buy an ee, I will want to install software the way I can do it on Ubuntu and Debian, with just a few clicks and now downloading or hanging around on some websites, trying to figure out which .exe you have to get like you are forced to on Windows.


Ever tried to install several programs at once in Windows? In Linux, you see users pick and choose from what is available.. "hmm, and this one and this one and this one..." and then download, install it, configure it automatically, with just one click. No silly "where do you want it installed?" questions. It is clear where a thing should be installed, at least on any Linux system.

To say it short: users love this, since it is less fussy and much more easy than in Windows. So easy in fact, that they don't get at first how this can exist at all, since they have never seen it on Windows.


Markus


0 Votes

blast, my post got duplicated. Can you please erase it? The refresh function in the browser just resends the post. It was not my intention.


Markus


0 Votes
Share Your Comments

If you are a member, to have your comment attributed to you. If you are not yet a member, Join OStatic and help the Open Source community by sharing your thoughts, answering user questions and providing reviews and alternatives for projects.