K Desktop Environment is Dead: Long Live KDE

by Joe Brockmeier - Nov. 25, 2009Comments (12)

Following in the footsteps of KFC, the KDE Project is rebranding and getting rid of the full name "K Desktop Environment." Unlike KFC, KDE won't be offering crispy chicken and stale biscuits. What KDE will be offering is "distinct brands for the software that was previously referred to generically as 'KDE'." Instead of offering KDE 4.4 in 2010, the project will be releasing the "KDE Software Compilation 4.4."

According to the post, the rationale for the switch is that KDE doesn't just represent the software, it represents the community and the body of software produced by the community. The repositioning document lays out all the new names and suggested naming for applications.

The suggestion for applications that are not prefixed with the telltale "K" is that they should be preceded by KDE: KDE Okular instead of Okular, KDE Dolphin instead of Dolphin, and so on.

With the transition from the KDE 3 series to KDE 4, the project has had a lot of cause to think about branding, marketing, and so forth. The project has been reinventing itself with a focus on being a development platform, as opposed to merely a *nix desktop environment. It's good to see major projects focusing on the marketing aspect as well, one hopes it will be accompanied by a similar focus on meeting end users needs as well as the branding.

The rebranding may pose a slight challenge for downstream projects like openSUSE, Kubuntu, and Fedora that ship KDE. Explaining that the distribution includes KDE to users unfamiliar with a choice of desktop environment was not trivial — explaining that it includes the "KDE Software Compilation" could take an afternoon.

The work on branding hasn't stopped KDE from pushing out more good stuff, though. The project also announced KOffice 2.1.0. The release is still tagged as an "early adopter" version, and not quite ready for production use — but with significant improvements over the 2.0 release.

The graphics applications in the KOffice suite are an exception to the "not quite ready yet" rule for KOffice 2.1. Krita and Karbon (the photo editor and vector graphics application, respectively) are considered ready for widespread use with this release.

One might wish the KDE folks to add a branding guideline that calls for using ".0" only with software that is, in fact, considered production ready. Other than that, though, the branding guidelines and KOffice release look like positive steps for the project towards meeting the goals of providing an excellent free software platform.

Joe 'Zonker' Brockmeier is a longtime FOSS advocate, and currently works for Novell as the community manager for openSUSE. Prior to joining Novell, Brockmeier worked as a technology journalist covering the open source beat for a number of publications, including Linux Magazine, Linux Weekly News, Linux.com, UnixReview.com, IBM developerWorks, and many others.



Craig Harris uses OStatic to support Open Source, ask and answer questions and stay informed. What about you?



12 Comments
 

one of the reason i hated KDE for its naming...k for everything.....its welcome change since nowdays the GNOME is getting more attention and innovation (GNOME shell ) than KDE


0 Votes

FOSS naming in general is pretty warped. Gimp? Gnu? Goo? Get devs on a track and it is crazy to see what we can come up with!


0 Votes

I for one can't wait for KDE to go the way of the dodo. Some of its applications are fine, and I hope they'll stick around. But, the KDE desktop itself is nothing but a constant source of problems, and a resources hog.


0 Votes

"The software distribution formerly known as KDE". Yeah, that's a distinction with a difference.


0 Votes

KDE a resource hog? Sorry but thats completely wrong. A well maintained KDE system will actually use LESS resources than Gnome or Xfce. Please try and do some research.


0 Votes

IMOHO


KDE 3 to KDE 4 was a disaster because KDE 4 should have been more like KDE 4 alpha. When you release something as KDE 4 then it should be done and ready for professional production use! Even MS finally caught on with 7. If it needs testing then don't call if finished!


Finally, KDE 4 is becoming a great desktop that is always should have been the moment it got the full 4.0 label. At 4.3 it is at last mostly stable, very fast and has other software that works. So how long will it take for the reputation to recover?


0 Votes

IMOHO


KDE 3 to KDE 4 was a disaster because KDE 4 should have been more like KDE 4 alpha. When you release something as KDE 4 then it should be done and ready for professional production use! Even MS finally caught on with 7. If it needs testing then don't call if finished!


Finally, KDE 4 is becoming a great desktop that is always should have been the moment it got the full 4.0 label. At 4.3 it is at last mostly stable, very fast and has other software that works. So how long will it take for the reputation to recover?


0 Votes

I for one can't wait for Gnome and GTK to go the way of the dodo. Some of its applications are fine, and I hope they'll stick around. But, the Gnome desktop itself is nothing but a constant source of problems, and a resource hog.


See how easy it is to play this game.


0 Votes

@ madhu ...its welcome change since nowdays the GNOME is getting more attention and innovation (GNOME shell ) than KDE.


Really? madhu, I don't know where you've been these last couple years. gnome hasn't been doing any innovation these last few years. It's KDE who's been busy modernizing Linux desktop these last few years. It's the reason why Gnome is now working on Gnome shell (gnome 3.0) so they won't fall too far behind.


1 Votes

i prefer DOS 1.0 . it rocks and is the future


0 Votes

"KDE 3 to KDE 4 was a disaster because KDE 4 should have been more like KDE 4 alpha."

Complete and utter s**t. 4.0 was labeled a developer release - if you couldn't comprehend that then more fool you. It was done to spur on application migration. Release early and often - look it up - standard open source way of doing things.


"When you release something as KDE 4 then it should be done and ready for professional production use!"

yeah - right.. Release early and often etc etc


Still seeing this "complaint" is so tedious


0 Votes

@LinuxAdvocate


I tried e few distros and have a well tuned KDE on my openSUSE. It runs quite fine now, I must say, but for sure it's immensely more demanding on resources than, say my 3.5. doing the same things on the same hardware.


I also understand there's much more into KDE4...


0 Votes
Share Your Comments

If you are a member, to have your comment attributed to you. If you are not yet a member, Join OStatic and help the Open Source community by sharing your thoughts, answering user questions and providing reviews and alternatives for projects.