Linux Netbook Returns: Not Surprising, but Likely Avoidable

by Kristin Shoemaker - Oct. 06, 2008Comments (7)

Laptop Magazine talked to MSI's Director of US Sales, Andy Tung about the future of netbooks. Tung discussed future netbook sales and releases -- and presented the statistic that Linux-based netbooks are four times more likely to be returned.

jkOnTheRun reasons that this isn't terribly surprising. Considering the low price of Linux netbooks, and their rarity at larger retailers that might allow new users to "kick the tires," it seems that many new users leap, then look.

The return rate of Linux netbooks is pertinent to both netbook manufacturers and Linux users, and is not limited to FOSS acceptance -- or the bottom line.

There are a few things to note, before continuing. MSI's Wind is not available with Linux as a pre-installed operating system in the United States -- yet. A Linux option is planned -- or maybe the correct phrase would be "has been in the works for a very long time." It was announced previously that the Wind would run a modified version of Novell's SUSE Linux, but Tung has indicated that this is not set in stone.

Tung states that netbook return rates are higher than traditional notebook returns in general, and that the operating system plays a significant role. He says it is something ASUS has struggled with. He also stated that many big box retailers are hesitant to stock netbooks in stores, because they might cut into sales of higher priced notebooks.

I don't think there's anything untrue about Tung's assessment at face value. I would imagine there are more than a few who have purchased Linux netbooks for specific tasks, thinking, "How different can it be?" Some might discover it suits them fine, but others might not have anticipated they couldn't run their company's proprietary application -- the application unique to their company, its goals, and their job duties -- the one that only runs on Windows. I also think it's possible a lot of netbooks come back due to screen resolutions not being quite what was expected, or keyboards being uncomfortably cramped.

Presentation is everything.

More netbooks -- Linux, or otherwise -- in "standard" retail outlets could reduce the return rate, if only because buyers could see, feel, and try out, even just briefly, the hardware and the software. The product is tangible, the software is right there, and the abstract idea of "Linux" is given a solid form.

The default "Easy Mode" Xandros interface on the Eee is distinctive -- and no potential buyer who had ever used Windows or Mac would mistake it for those systems. It might not seem like Linux either, but it should be enough that a potential buyer will recognize that this is different, and explore further.

Presentation includes considering target markets. I have an EeePC 701, and with the default Easy Mode Xandros loaded, it is difficult to imagine that ASUS dreamed of selling it to any other market than school aged children. For this market, this interface is quite friendly and sufficient. But it likely isn't the most lucrative market.

Naturally, other distributions work nicely on these machines, but it isn't what ASUS intended. Consumers liked the idea, adapted the netbooks, and some, alas, were disappointed.

My household also harbors a Wind. Yes, a netbook, but clearly not an Eee, and clearly geared toward a different buyer demographic. The specs, the look -- it has a different target market. Is it one that wouldn't find Linux useful? That's debatable, but the distribution's presentation would need to be vastly different than that of the Eee. The Linux Wind would need to be displayed in physical stores, perhaps, for many to see, and understand, the differences -- and ultimately decide which works better in their situation.

Tung doesn't indicate that MSI is abandoning Linux on their netbooks, just that they're thinking further about what would reduce the return rate. Linux test drives, whether they come from fooling with store floor models, or virtual desktop demos on retailer/manufacturer sites, could be key in offering buyers the operating system that is the best fit, without great risk or expense to manufacturers and retailers.



Khürt Williams uses OStatic to support Open Source, ask and answer questions and stay informed. What about you?



7 Comments
 

My guess is that the small screen sizes/resolution is a bigger problem on Linux than on windows.

Back in the late 1980:s X11 was designed to run on 21" screens and expensive workstations. Even today many X11 application have rather large dialogs, and the controls tend to have large texts by default.

This is not a problem as long as people use the preinstalled hopefully small screen tuned GUI, but as they want to do more they try to use standard Linux, and then these machines don't cut it from screen resolution point of view.

0 Votes

What are the numbers behind the return rate. Were they comparing 10k linux sales to 1k xp sales ?

Not that I don't trust the source, but, it is too easy to spin the numbers ... the word RATE means nothing to people ... they see wow, 400 linux units returned and only 100 windows units returned .... were the sales also 4:1 ?????

0 Votes

that is happening is that they see that it has an OS software package that does not do what they need it to do.

Obviously, if linux did what they needed and wanted they would use it.

to fix this its simple make linux better,, it has to be at least as usable and functional as Windows..

IF they purchased this laptop and even though it has an alternative OS BUT still did what they needed and wanted, they would consider they got a bargin

but it does not , so they return and are willing to PAY for a product that works (for them).

this is a MAJOR lesson FOSS needs to learn, Free, does not meen good, or wanted..

0 Votes

"Obviously, if linux did what they needed and wanted they would use it."

This is not the problem. Linux is as usable as Windows is, and you can do pretty much anything with it. And don't make the mistake of thinking it's not user-friendly either.

I think the average computer-illiterate just panics when they encounter something that looks/feels different to what they are used to.

Do yourself a favour and try out the Mandriva One live CD. You'll immediately realise that whatever you thought about Linux being unusable is wrong.

Unfortunately, these netbooks ship with weird, watered-down, half-assed Linux distributions that are made to be appliance-like, and I don't think people necessarily want that, even though it's easy to remedy by just replacing the software.

0 Votes

jacog: it's actually a bit more fun than that. portarit if you can an non-technical user who has never heard of Windows NT. Then lend them a computer with it, telling them it's "almost the same" than XP, only written by a group of volunteers on the Internet. My guess is that they will play with it for a little, but reject it at the fist problem. The problem is not that it looks or feels different, or that it actually is compatible. The problem is one of necessity. People will avoid unnecessary risks, and changing the desktop is not a necessity for most.

0 Votes

Well, Linux is out there in the real world at last; and by the real world, I mean the world of "normal" people, who have no real experience of computers. If they buy a Windows machine and do not understand how to use it, they can ask around their friends and family and find someone that can help. They do not really understand computers on any sort of level and only achieve a very low level of competency by the "monkey see - monkey do" sort of learning. It will take some time before the computer literate among their friends and family can gain the Linux knowledge to help these people.


0 Votes

Personally, i am technically proficient and find when ever i hop onto a Linux PC that there is just nothing to do, it's boring, finding, installing and using software is rarely easy . The biggest thing that turns me off using Linux as my main boot is that my girlfriend cant get use to it, every edition of Windows she has been able to sit down and work out, Make Movies, Play Music, Surf The Web, Make Presentations, Edit And Manage Her Photos, she was able to do all this with a Mac as well.

Windows comes with a whole heap of well built pieces of software that integrate well, this is not to say that Linux doesn't come with software but none of it is jaw dropping.


Until Linux simplifies it's operating system and gives into at least copying some of Mac and Windows features they will be sitting on the sideline within the home market and whats more business' will be more reluctant to implement an operating system within the work environment if now one knows or wants to know how to use Linux. After using Windows 7 since beta release i think that it will take back any market share gained by Linux.

I am not against Linux, i want it to succeed but until development actually moves towards cloning mac and Linux they have no real hope.


0 Votes
Share Your Comments

If you are a member, to have your comment attributed to you. If you are not yet a member, Join OStatic and help the Open Source community by sharing your thoughts, answering user questions and providing reviews and alternatives for projects.