Mandriva Will Not Abandon RPM 5
Follow Us:
Follow us on Twitter
Subscribe to our RSS
Mandriva Will Not Abandon RPM 5
by Susan Linton - Jun. 28, 2012Comments (4)
Related Blog PostsFriday Linux PotpourriRaspberry Pi's Momentum Picks Up, and Google Pitches InReports Emerge About Samsung Notebooks Bricking Through UEFI Linux BootsNew Linux Brings Spark to DebianMageia 3 Beta 2 Released
There have been some rumors floating around that Mandriva was going to abandon their transition to RPM 5, a fork of the original Red Hat Package Manager. Mandriva began moving to RPM 5 quite a while ago because it offers increased performance and added features. So today Per Øyvind Karlsen, Mandriva Project Leader, confirmed that Mandriva has no plans to abandon RPM 5.In a blog post today, Per Øyvind Karlsen said he needed to set some rumors to rest. The first one has already been settled, but Karlsen confirmed there were no plans to remerge the Mandriva and Mageia projects. Additionally, Karlsen also wishes to settle the ongoing discussion concerning RPM 5. He said "as the current project leader of Mandriva Linux and also as the main rpm developer for the distribution, I can safely put this rumour to rest right away." He's not sure where the rumor began, but Karlsen said he's very active in developing RPM 5 for Mandriva (and upstream) and he has no intentions of going back. He also said he knows for sure ROSA wouldn't abandon it either, since he also works for them as.Finally, Karlsen says he hopes folks will starting coming up with more original and interesting FUD from now on. He wonders, "Why aren't anyone speaking about our recent endorsements from David Hasselhoff??"
linux Mandriva
Previous: Asus Delivers New Ee...Next: Kororaa 17 Delayed Browse Blog
John Mark Walker uses OStatic to support Open Source, ask and answer questions and stay informed. What about you?
by Raphael on Jun. 30, 2012Because increasing divergence through reliance on RPM5 (incompatible packages across distros) has a more direct impact on community than preaching, however entertaining or flattering it might be. If downstream distros are to use MDV as a base, RPM5 could only cause them trouble (adoption by them also unlikely, as it solves no real problem that couldnt have been adressed on RPM4).
Where is the community-led development, when RPM5 is this forcefully imposed on no merits other than because few decided not to change part of the reasons for MDV's demise as a distro?
0 Votes
by Per Øyvind Karlsen on Jul. 03, 2012what are the incompatibilities you speak of?
Ie. rpm in Mageia is more incompatible with upstream than the rpm version in current cooker because most of the incompatibilites doesn't lie in the actual rpm implementation itself (although Mageia is carrying several patches from Mandriva and that's not part of upstream which brings incompatibilities), but rather in the different helper scripts, macros, dependency generators etc. that tends to be implemented in different fashion between many distros, even despite newer and better upstream implementations has come to existence since.
Also the major reason for why switching toi rpm5 is because of it not being made possible to do this high level of development on rpm 4 and expect it to be merged anytime soon as 'development is - and has always been - a "Red Hat show" with some individual contributions' (
And rpm5 isn't anywhere related to the difficulties experienced over the last year, which most people who's actually been involved with Mandriva during the time should be easily able to confirm.
Please back up your claims by some actual technical facts or some credible references, currently they're not anything more than plain FUD.
1 Votes
by devnet on Jul. 03, 2012No merits to rpm5? Dude, you're a troll if you think that's true. There are many merits to rpm5 and the biggest is this:
No reliance upon 2 companies controlling the direction rpm goes.
1 Votes
by Bernhard Rosenkränzer on Jul. 04, 2012There are loads of merits to rpm5.
True, there's nothing that can't be solved with rpm4 in some way. There's also nothing that can't be solved with something a lot simpler like tarballs combined with text file metadata in some way.
rpm5 is a major step ahead (definitely a bigger step than rpm3 to rpm4).
Mandriva packages can be a lot simpler (and with fewer potential points of failure) because of rpm5 (e.g. there's no more need for manual install-info invocations in every package containing an info file).
Also, people calling rpm5 a fork are rewriting history. rpm5 is the "real" rpm, rpm4 is a fork, and one done for all the wrong reasons too.
rpm has been maintained by Jeff Johnson for the last decade. When he stopped working at Red Hat, he continued working on rpm (rpm 5.x, that is). But Red Hat didn't like the fact that it was no longer under their control, so they created a "we don't like you anymore, we don't take your code" type fork.
I'd rather trust the guy who made rpm what it is than a company that primarily serves its own financial interest.
(I don't have any gripes with the maintainer of the rpm 4.x branch by the way. He's doing his job (and can be expected to stop doing it when he changes employers), he's doing it fairly well, and forking wasn't his idea.)
0 Votes
Share Your Comments
If you are a member, Sign in to have your comment attributed to you. If you are not yet a member, Join OStatic and help the Open Source community by sharing your thoughts, answering user questions and providing reviews and alternatives for projects.
Your Name
Email Address (kept hidden)
Your Comment *
Promote Open Source Knowledge by sharing your thoughts, listing Alternatives and Answering Questions!
Explore Software in this Blog Post
Mandriva has 0 reviews7 users
Your cloud solution managed 24/7
Expert cloud management & monitoring services starting at $9/mo.
Explore the plans
Featured MembersViewbalakrishna korrapatiCurrently working as Partner & CTO, Jugular Social Media, Hyderabad
ViewJohn Mark WalkerI'm an Open Source community guy, with an interest...
Related Questions
Get answers and share your expertise.
Have a question? Ask the community
Seriously, OSTatic! This is plain annoying!
By McKinsey - Oct 17, 2012
post answer
Installing Linux from Live CD
By Dineshrawar - Apr 09, 2012
3 answers
Scheduling backups to the cloud server
By Alvin Pieterson - Sep 16, 2011
post answer
Partner Center
Happening Now on OStatic
Eddie G. commented on LibreOffice 3.6.5 Finishes off 3.6
anonymous commented on LibreOffice 3.6.5 Finishes off 3.6
eebrah commented on Vim Basics
About OStatic
Terms of Service
Privacy Policy
Send Feedback
Powered by Vox Holdings
© 2011 OStatic. Design by smallTransport. Built on fine Open Source Software from projects like
MySQL and
Sign in to OStatic
Username: *
Password: *
Not a member? Join NowI forgot my password