Microsoft Strikes Another Sketchy Linux Patent-Protection Deal
Follow Us:
Follow us on Twitter
Subscribe to our RSS
Microsoft Strikes Another Sketchy Linux Patent-Protection Deal
by Sam Dean - Jul. 16, 2009Comments (1)
Related Blog PostsMicrosoft Linux, Fedora 23 Beta a GOAlliance for Open Media Could Transform Online Video, Challenge AdobeGoogle, Microsoft Create Alliance for Open MediaMicrosoft Launches Open Source Tools for Creating Office Add-insUsers Don't Care Windows 10 Spyware, It's Free
As Mary Jo Foley notes, Microsoft has announced yet another Linux patent-protection deal. We wrote about a similar patent-protection deal between GPS manufacturer Tom Tom and Microsoft here, following a very public squabble between the two companies. This time, Melco Holdings, a Japanese company that owns network storage and router player Buffalo Inc. has a deal with Microsoft, "that will provide Melco Group’s customers with patent coverage for their use of industry-leading technologies running Linux and other related open source software." These deals are very murky and difficult to get a handle on, especially since the settlements leave no public trail leading to what exactly Microsoft claims ownership of. As we noted here, when Tom Tom countersued Microsoft in its dispute, Microsoft's Horacio Gutierrez stated that its lawsuit in that case was not an attack on the Linux kernel as whole, although many in the open source world saw it that way. Some observers felt that Microsoft's FAT32 file system patents were central to that dispute, but the whole thing was murky. In Microsoft's latest release, addressing its deal with Melco Holdings, there is this: "We are pleased to reach this agreement with Melco Group,” said David Kaefer, general manager of Intellectual Property and Licensing at Microsoft. “Many companies have entered similar agreements with Microsoft covering their Linux-based offerings, something that is a reflection of both Microsoft’s decades-long commitment to R&D in the operating system space and the high-quality patent portfolio we’ve developed through our R&D efforts.” Hajime Nakai, director and member of the board at Buffalo has this to say in Microsoft's release: “While we plan to increasingly adopt Windows Storage Server for our NAS business, we also wanted to ensure that our open source and Linux-embedded devices had the appropriate IP protections. By collaborating with Microsoft on a practical business solution, we are able to provide our customers with the appropriate IP coverage, while also maintaining full compliance with our obligations under the GPLv2.”It's beginning to look like Microsoft is frequently the toll booth that almost everyone has to stop at when delivering Linux-based offerings, and Microsoft has previously suggested that Red Hat violates its patents. Microsoft has not stated which patents are at issue in the Melco instance, though, even though the Linux community has requested that it be more transparent about these issues. When will the company heed that call?
Microsoft patents Tom Tom Melco Holdings Buffalo
Previous: 10 Free Resources fo...Next: Spaz: A Microbloggi... Browse Blog
Randy Clark uses OStatic to support Open Source, ask and answer questions and stay informed. What about you?
by Randy Clark on Jul. 16, 2009Micro$oft always seems to be doing things that cause it to lose trust in the eyes of the FOSS crowd. They claim to get it, but their actions never seem to indicate that.
0 Votes
Share Your Comments
If you are a member, Sign in to have your comment attributed to you. If you are not yet a member, Join OStatic and help the Open Source community by sharing your thoughts, answering user questions and providing reviews and alternatives for projects.
Your Name
Email Address (kept hidden)
Your Comment *
Promote Open Source Knowledge by sharing your thoughts, listing Alternatives and Answering Questions!
Featured MembersViewJesse BabsonI used to work for a large chip company here and a...
ViewRandy ClarkLinux lover. LAMP user. Have been using OSS for a decade now. Ubuntu, Fedora, CentOS, SuSE, RedHat...'Nuff said.
Related Questions
Get answers and share your expertise.
Have a question? Ask the community
tech question
By john karl - May 04, 2012
1 answer
What Exactly is the Difference Between Google and Microsoft’s Promises for Cloud Uptime Percentages?
By MayaRafael - Feb 06, 2012
4 answers
Skydrive API for Windows Phone 7?
By Adam Marshall - Sep 08, 2011
3 answers
Partner Center
Happening Now on OStatic
hinaismil commented on Dia: A Strong Open Source Answer to Microsoft's Visio
Rudi commented on SourceForge's Community Choice Awards: Winners Named
SpendVu commented on Open Workbench: All the Fun of Microsoft Project With None of the Hassle
About OStatic
Terms of Service
Privacy Policy
Send Feedback
Powered by Vox Holdings
© 2015 OStatic. Built on fine Open Source Software from projects like
MySQL and
Sign in to OStatic
Username: *
Password: *
Not a member? Join NowI forgot my password