Open Movie Editor: Linux Video Editor with Plot Twists

by Kristin Shoemaker - Oct. 22, 2008Comments (9)

A common lament from home videographers is that Linux lacks video editors. It's not exactly true. There's Kino, which edits video and acts as a frontend to dvgrab. Jahshaka edits videos, and uses openGL to add special effects (though many say Jahshaka's strength is its user interface). Cinelerra is a professional grade editor, and while someone working with video regularly might find this is the only option, those needing simple edits and common effects will find it overkill.

There's another alternative for those needing a basic video editor. Open Movie Editor seems plain compared to Kino, but works with more file formats (with fewer hassles). It has a Jahshaka-like interface, without its occasional installation quirks.

Open Movie Editor is available via the repositories for a number of distributions. It's important to note, though, that installing the editor in this manner doesn't pull in all of the filter effects that it supports, nor does it necessarily integrate all of the codecs it can potentially work with. Open Movie Editor uses LAME and ffmpeg for its encoding and decoding tasks. It also uses the Frei0r Video Effect Plugin Standard, and source tarballs and binary packages of these plugins are available from the Frei0r website.

Kino has two advantages over Open Movie Editor -- it effectively puts a GUI on dvgrab, making it a bit easier to get video from a digital camcorder on to a computer. It also has easily implemented transitions, something that seemed to be lacking from the Open Movie Editor. However, the Open Movie Editor allows for finer tuning of some video manipulation aspects, and this effect could be achieved with skilled crossfading. It seems as though Open Movie Editor is aiming for a user base with a keener interest in video editing than Kino's users, but not necessarily the demographic Cinelerra would appeal to.

Open Movie Editor has a lot more "curb appeal" than Kino, however, and using it just felt natural. The timeline and track layouts were presented in a similar way as they are in Jahshaka, and it was visually easy to picture and work with multiple video and audio tracks. The advantage over Jahshaka in this case is simply ease of installation (Jahshaka has gotten easier to install, but it still is temperamental) and the fact it is extremely stable.

openmovieeditor

Open Movie Editor features a built in file browser, clip viewer, and media browser. The video being edited can be viewed from this area, as edits are made. The "track" style layout is particularly helpful, especially to those unfamiliar with video editing. It's very visual, even when it comes to blanking any sound captured on video and replacing it with a separate audio track. One thing to take note of is that the file and media browser require the desired media be dragged and dropped to the appropriate track and place in the timeline.

movieeditor

Once a clip is dragged to the track, it can be slid to the desired starting point, trimmed, split, or joined with other clips. The tools to do these tasks are located on the far left side of the screen near the tracks.

movieeditor3

Adding a title wasn't quite as obvious as it felt like it should have been, but it was at least consistent with how other effects and media are added to the video. The filter (titling, in this case) is dragged and dropped on the appropriate track or selected clip. Arrows appear where the titling is dropped, and then duration and aesthetics can be adjusted.

movieeditor4

Here I split a clip and inserted a bit of titling. Using a multiple track layout, splitting, and cross fading, it would have been possible to make a much less abrupt transition. It seems a bit more work, but it is also gives the editor a much greater degree of control over the video's look.

movieeditor5

There are only a few filter options included with Open Movie Editor by default (the Frei0r plugins are definitely recommended) but these options are very customizable.

movieeditor6

Applied special effects and filters can be viewed and adjusted in real time on the selected clip. Audio tracks can be edited to a reasonable extent with the Open Movie Editor as well, though, again, it would be unrealistic to expect either Audacity's or Cinelerra's audio capabilities in this setting.

In general, Linux video editors, admittedly, aren't where Mac video editors are presently. Kino and Jahshaka, two popular "end user" video editing applications for Linux, seem fairly comparable to some of the common "consumer targeted" proprietary applications available for other platforms in terms of features, function, and ease of use. Cinelerra exceeds that caliber of application, but is also far more than the typical user needs. Open Movie Editor is a strong application that mixes some of the best features of Kino and Jahshaka, and delivers it in a powerful -- but not overpowered -- package.



Gerard Braad uses OStatic to support Open Source, ask and answer questions and stay informed. What about you?



9 Comments
 

God! It looks like shit. I wouldn't even poke it with a stick just after looking at those screenshots. And I am a freetard, people who have no problems with proprietary software wouldn't even look at it.


0 Votes

I've tried using Open Movie editor after installing it from the repos in Ubuntu 8.04. It comes with no documentation, it is totally non intuitive and it does look plain and plain ugly. How is a person who needs simple editing going to use it because a person like that would be someone new to Linux. Maybe open source software is not always the best option and far far behind than what most propriety software offer for a small price, other than of course we don't the source code. But how has this software improved even with the source code being available? If the developer is not interested in developing this software further he should arrange for it to be taken off the repos instead of letting down people who want a taste of what open source has to offer.


0 Votes

"the developer is not interested in developing this software further"?

If you look at the sourceforge file listing for this project, you will see numerous releases have been made since the version included in 8.04's repository. However, the developer still classifies this software as alpha. If you have done any software development, you can appreciate how long it takes to create an application this size in your spare time.


0 Votes

you should try out kdenlive kde4 version.


0 Votes

After trying all the ones mentioned, i use kdenlive to create great titles and transitions.....it is way better than Windows Movie Maker......


0 Votes

I use cinelerra


0 Votes

tried to use this proram.

went to drag a file into the video timeline and the program crashed.


0 Votes

i found this programme is exteremly super..by the way,i dont have this programme,i would like to have,i saw from youtube,the systems must be really nice,i have one question,

is there any freeware for this programme...i mean without payment,either trail or non payment?..

thanks


0 Votes

thanks for helping.


0 Votes
Share Your Comments

If you are a member, to have your comment attributed to you. If you are not yet a member, Join OStatic and help the Open Source community by sharing your thoughts, answering user questions and providing reviews and alternatives for projects.