Report: Don't Look to Dell These Days for Linux-based Systems
OStatic
Home
Blog
Questions
Software
Members
 
 
 
Follow Us:
Follow us on Twitter
Subscribe to our RSS
About
Contact
Report: Don't Look to Dell These Days for Linux-based Systems
by Sam Dean - Apr. 28, 2011Comments (4)
Related Blog PostsopenSUSE 13.1 Beta Released with Btrfs TestingSlackware 14.1 on Its WayGovernment of Argentina Launches Linux DistributionTrueAbility Launches Ability Screen for Linux ProsNew Bodhi Linux Arrives after Six Months with New Schedule
Among the major PC manufacturers, as we've noted on OStatic a number of times, Dell--the number two player behind Hewlett-Packard--has shown a lot of support over time for Linux. It has offered Ubuntu on many systems pre-loaded, and Dell product managers have had consistently good things to say about Linux. That's why it's frustrating to see Dell--which is increasingly focused on enterprise buyers--wavering in its long-standing support for Linux. A simple look around the Dell web site illustrates this wavering, and there are other signs that Linux is falling off of Dell's radar.Open source expert Glyn Moody, writing for Computerworld U.K. notes this: "Today, when you try to find out about Dell's systems running GNU/Linux, you are once more confronted with a totally unhelpful Web site. There is nothing that I can find on the home page, nor anything on any of the product pages. Searching for “Ubuntu” brings up a load of useless info about printers, plus a tiny link to "Dell Open Source", so small it doesn't even look like a result."I followed Moody's tracks through the Ubuntu-focused link above, and sure enough, he's right that at first glance it's nearly impossible to find anything on Dell's site that would seem to make it easy to order a Linux-based system. Moody's further investigation led him to this more helpful page, but if you follow the "Shop Now" button on that page, you find a woefully incomplete landing page.These findings are more significant than they may seem at first. It's extremely important for the major PC manufacturers to offer Linux as an option, and make it easy for people interested in Linux to learn about its advantages. If this doesn't seem important, just consider the success that Microsoft had in the late 1980s and early 1990s in getting PC manufacturers to adopt Windows. Its sway with them helped Microsoft put Windows on the vast majority of business desktops, and--at the time--helped squash Apple's personal computing efforts. Hopefully Dell will return to the Linux-friendly corporate stance that it once had. One also hopes that Dell isn't getting pressure from Microsoft or other major industry players to marginalize Linux. One thing's for sure: Dell's historically enthusiastic stance toward Linux is a shell of what it once was.
Dell ubuntu linux
Previous: New Book, BioPunk, C...Next: 514cKW4r3 1337 R3134... Browse Blog
Balakrishna Korrapati uses OStatic to support Open Source, ask and answer questions and stay informed. What about you?
 
4 Comments
 
by an anonymous user on Apr. 28, 2011There has never been a direct link to Linux powered machines on the Dell website. Even when they were getting all the press for offering an alternative, the only way to find it was by knowing where to look for it.
0 Votes
by V. T. Eric Layton on Apr. 28, 2011Dell? Pffft... GNU/Linux will do just fine without them.
0 Votes
by bumpy on Apr. 28, 2011I've bought two computers from Dell with Ubuntu preloaded, most recently a Studio 7100.
I don't know if this is related, but some months earlier, I made an inquiry through Dell's online chat interface about the Studio 7100, asking specifically whether it came with Linux installed. The answer was no. I said, in that case I wasn't interested. And no, there was nothing else they could help me with, thank you very much.
Who knows, that may have made a difference.
0 Votes
by Tuxdude on Apr. 30, 2011Dell's concentrating more on "white boxes" for OEM's and business customers putting their own appliance Linux onto the machines. They still support Linux, just not on machines shipped to consumers, where the volumes and margins weren't there to support the additional complexity on the assembly line of maintaining a second OS disk set and validation tools (because the things do get fired up and run with a diagnostic tool set at the end of assembly to validate that they're correct and match the build spec).
0 Votes
Share Your Comments
If you are a member, Sign in to have your comment attributed to you. If you are not yet a member, Join OStatic and help the Open Source community by sharing your thoughts, answering user questions and providing reviews and alternatives for projects.
Your Name
Email Address (kept hidden)
Your Comment *
Promote Open Source Knowledge by sharing your thoughts, listing Alternatives and Answering Questions!
 
Explore Software in this Blog Post
1
2
3
4
5
Ubuntu has 19 reviews294 users
Featured MembersViewGerard BraadSoftware/Hardware engineer and Visuals Artist. Maintains Unix and Windows systems/networks. Fanatic user of Linux and Unices.
ViewBalakrishna KorrapatiCurrently working as Partner & CTO, Jugular Social Media, Hyderabad
Related Questions
Browse
Get answers and share your expertise.
Have a question? Ask the community
Seriously, OSTatic! This is plain annoying!
By McKinsey - Oct 17, 2012
post answer
Installing Linux from Live CD
By Dineshrawar - Apr 09, 2012
3 answers
Dual Booting Windows and Linux
By Arnab Chatterjee - Nov 16, 2011
5 answers
Partner Center
Happening Now on OStatic
anonymous commented on Here's How to Sharpen Your OpenStack Cloud Skills
gonetil commented on Government of Argentina Launches Linux Distribution
anonymous commented on Government of Argentina Launches Linux Distribution
Home
Blog
Software
Questions
About OStatic
Contact
Terms of Service
Privacy Policy
Send Feedback
Powered by Vox Holdings
© 2013 OStatic. Built on fine Open Source Software from projects like
Apache,
Drupal,
Java,
Linux,
MySQL and
PHP.
Sign in to OStatic
close
Username: *
Password: *
Not a member? Join NowI forgot my password