SpringSource Acquires Hyperic, Focuses On Moving Deeper Into Enterprise Software Stacks

by Sam Dean - May. 04, 2009Comments (5)

Today, SpringSource, which makes the Spring Framework, the leading open source application framework for Java, announced that it has acquired Hyperic, which supplies enterprise application management and monitoring software. The move could lead to much deeper entrechment for SpringSource in enterprises, because Hyperic's flagship Hyperic HQ software troubleshoots and monitors hardware, networks, virtualization, cloud environments and massively scalable applications.

Hyperic's open source software is used for monitoring large enterprise MySQL deployments, among other things. Many retail, financial services, manufacturing and technology companies already use SpringSource to manage the lifecyles of Java applications. But With Hyperic under its wing, SpringSource can potentially start to manage many more critical aspects of enterprise networks, and ambitious cloud applications.

In an interview we did with Hyperic last year, Stacey Schneider, Senior Director of Marketing, said that Hyperic's software "auto-discovers and starts monitoring key performance metrics across the majority of the components companies use to build their web applications." Java applications are only a subset of what is monitored. Hyperic's technology is also designed to perform monitoring tasks that go beyond server virtualization and into the cloud. Schneider made the point that in her opinion "only about 2 percent of companies" are adequately addressing virtualization. She added that in the cloud:

 

"...All the hardware is virtualized. The rates of change in those environments are enormous, and many of the virtualization technologies developed to power them obfuscate critical relationships between the various layers powering applications. Without clear visibility, admins are at an unprecedented disadvantage to meeting their SLAs."

 

Matt Asay makes the point that the acquisition means that SpringSource can compete directly with Microsoft and IBM. Those companies control both development tools and environments, and management and monitoring applications--as SpringSource now does. He also supplies a key quote from Javier Soltero, CEO of Hyperic, where he says:

 

"This is more than a marriage of code. It's about merging the best people in IT management with the best in Java application development. It gives us broader and deeper visibility up and down the software stack and across a company's network and data center, including virtualization and cloud computing environments."

Both in the cloud and in on-premise application deployments, Hyperic's technology should help SpringSource compete with large, proprietary players--that's true. I also think that with Hyperic, SpringSource has the potential to grow along with key initiatives from big proprietary software companies. As just one example, Hyperic's software is widely used to monitor and manage many large-scale MySQL deployments. If Oracle spreads the reach of MySQL, SpringSource could spread its reach in monitoring, managing and scaling deployments.

SpringSource and Hyperic were already partners before this acquisition. I'm betting that they'll work together smoothly and gain a lot of traction in enterprises and IT departments. Along with Oracle's big acquisition of Sun Microsystems,  this latest acquisition also reminds me of a prediction I made at the end of last year: This year, we're going to see lots of increased action in open source M&A.

 



Craig Harris uses OStatic to support Open Source, ask and answer questions and stay informed. What about you?



5 Comments
 

This acquisition doesn't make much sense to me from a technology perspective.


Spring Source is all around Spring and Java-based app development. Hyperic is around Systems monitoring and management. Spring is sold to developers and VPs of Engineering. Hyperic is sold to network admins.


Hyperic is going after cloud management. Spring _may_ be throwing all their dev resources around building cloud applications, but do you need to buy a monitoring company for that?


0 Votes

@Peter - you need to dig a bit deeper!


SpringSource - investors = Benchmark and Accel

Hyperic - investors = Benchmark and Accel


Benchmark partner on both deals = Peter Fenton

Accel partner on both deals = Kevin Efrusy


Peter Fenton's previous firm = Accel

Peter Fenton's current firm = Benchmark


Both these guys have a great reputation in the market, and I get the distinct feeling that perhaps it didn't make sense to divide the efforts across the two companies. I'm sure both these firms would need to raise capital at some point and rather than fund both separately, the call must have been made to cross the Styx on one boat rather than two. I cannot imagine Hyperic selling like hot-cakes when Nagios does a bang-up job, and is available completely for free, and is Open Source to boot. Not that many people have adopted the cloud yet, so I'm sure sales have been tough to come by, but the market is definitely there - IF YOU CAN cross the Styx!


A deal that WOULD have made more sense would have been Hyperic getting acquired by a stronger competitor like Solar Winds, that just filed to go public. Perhaps they will acquire Zenoss?


The teams are smart. I am sure they will come up with some sort of combined offering to develop and then monitor applications in the enterprise, but I am missing the real benefits to the technology roadmaps in this deal.


0 Votes

Covalent was purchased by SS about a year ago. Covalent was the original authors of Hyperic, before it became a commercial product. So it only seems natural that SS/Covalent has pulled Hyperic back into the fold.


http://www.springsource.com/covalent


http://blogs.zdnet.com/open-source/?p=673


0 Votes

Well, Covalent was in wide use for administering Tomcat and Apache installations - one of the mainstay stacks for J2EE and Spring-based applications.


Hyperic is for network monitoring, server uptimes, disk usage, etc.


There is some overlap but I feel the acquisition is more for the team and for financial reasons.


I could be wrong here, but that's what this sounds like. The future product announcements and roadmaps will reveal a lot about any additive vs accretive synergies.


0 Votes

I do feel this acquisition is for the team, though, since the Hyperic folks have built a solid product, which may have been mis-timed in this down market.


0 Votes
Share Your Comments

If you are a member, to have your comment attributed to you. If you are not yet a member, Join OStatic and help the Open Source community by sharing your thoughts, answering user questions and providing reviews and alternatives for projects.