Top Reasons Why People Leave Linux: Is There Anything To These?

by Sam Dean - May. 01, 2009Comments (5)

In January, we wrote about a free, downloadable book on Ubuntu called Ubuntu Pocket Guide and Reference, which is helpful for diving into Ubuntu. The book's author is Keir Thomas, who has written other books on Linux. Today, he reports in a post that over the years he has heard from many readers and other people who have quit Linux to move to platforms such as Windows or the Mac. He supplies the Top 7 Reasons People Quit Linux here. There are some interesting reasons why people quit, and some interesting rebuttals from Thomas. There are also some implied usability lessons for the Linux community.

Thomas cites these, based on communications he's had with many Linux users, as the top reasons that people abandon ship:

1. Linux doesn't run a program I use

2. I installed Linux but some element of my hardware didn't work

3. I tried Linux but I had to type commands

4. I did *this*, and *this* happened. That doesn't happen with Windows

5. I posted a message on a forum, but Linux people were mean to me

6. I just don't like it

7. I installed Linux and things went honey-nut-loops crazy

I had to laugh at reason number five: "I posted a message on a forum, but Linux people were mean to me." Linux people. Could it be that members of the Linux community are ideologues, as is true of many people in the Mac community, and that this results in a generally attitudinal way of talking to new users? Maybe I'm overthinking it, and Linux users are just anti-social.

Seriously, though, Thomas does a good job on his rebuttals to many of the seven points, although I think points number two and seven represent areas where Linux needs improvement. Hardware incompatibility and inexplicable errors are too prevalent across most Linux distros I've used.

The new Jaunty Jackalope version of Ubuntu actually does a much better job with hardware compatibility than previous versions, which is good to see. Still, though, Windows and the Mac--particularly the Mac--remain easier to use hardware with on a plug-and-play basis. There are efforts to level the playing field, but more needs to be done.

Inexplicable errors are indeed another prevalent Linux problem, and part of the problem is simply how Linux distros report back when there is a problem. Thomas dismisses these problems as usually being "one-off events," but they are all too common. Consider this post from PCMag.com, where the site's editor describes his very first attempt to install Ubuntu. After installation, Ubuntu asked for a reboot, and then wouldn't boot. Here's what the editor reports:

 

"I just got this system screen readout saying: Grub Loading Stage 1.5.1...Grub loading, please wait...Error 18. Grub? Crud. Actually, I know from my Twitter/Linux friends that Grub is supposed to help manage the multi-boot load. Instead, it found an error and simply halted the system. No matter what I did, every reboot was the same. It was time to start over."

 

While it's true that this is just one single error, Ubuntu is not exactly the least-installed version of Linux. When reporting an error, details should come back in plain language, with suggestions on how to fix the problem. Communicating with hardware and communicating with new users strike me as two areas where Linux does need improvement.

That said, it was good to see the market share milestone today: Linux has just  achieved one percent market share on the desktop for the first time, according to Net Applications. That's something for the Linux community to be proud of.



Khürt Williams uses OStatic to support Open Source, ask and answer questions and stay informed. What about you?



5 Comments
 

"Linux people were mean to me" - hahahah - that is too good to be anything but true! Linux is still viewed too much as a geek tool, though. The perception needs to be brought back into the fold.


0 Votes

1. Linux doesn't run a program I use...


well...there's lot of good quality software alternatives in open source world

For famous Only-works-in-windows-or Mac Types of Software. I think people still ask the same 'ol question.....If this software is free then how can it be good? Also there's Lot of User specific distros like Mythubuntu,Sciubuntu... etc etc......

So why do those people still thinks Photoshop or MS office is the only good softwares in the world?


0 Votes

The biggest problem I ran into on linux was the poor QA. When you package every open source and free software program in existence, it's hard to make sure they function properly before you ship an upgrade to a distro. I mean, it's nice to get an upgrade to something like Ubuntu every six months and get the latest and greatest, but if the new version of something has broken a feature that you use, what do you do? You have to backup and reinstall the old OS (a huge pain) or suffer through broken software. Packagers need to start using a checklist, like Mozilla' smoke tests, to run through all of the functionality of a new version of a program before they include it in a distro upgrade.


0 Votes

Wait, wut? An writer/editor @ *a PC magazine* couldn't resolve a Grub error? Whatever. I call the technical abilities of anyone suspect when they still think teh intrawebs require "www."


Good list, but I'd state it seems most people these days can't handle anything more complicated beyond "I can has cheezburger."


(disclaimer: I stopped reading the article after "www.ubuntu.com")


0 Votes

I found that a good way to get started is to download a pre-configured Virtual Image or use an Amazon EC2 image.


0 Votes
Share Your Comments

If you are a member, to have your comment attributed to you. If you are not yet a member, Join OStatic and help the Open Source community by sharing your thoughts, answering user questions and providing reviews and alternatives for projects.