Nd Power Of Language In William Shakespeare's Julius Caesar - Bishop Ryan Grade 11 - Essay

667 words - 3 pages

​Mind Bending: The Art Of Manipulation And
​Power Of Language
Manipulation and power of language is a social influence used to change one’s
behaviour or perception towards a situation so they react differently towards it. In William
Shakespeare’s play ​Julius Caesar, ​manipulation and power of language is used as a
weapon of mind control and abuse of power by many characters. Mark Antony, who is a
pleasure-seeking Roman General and loyal friend of Caesar’s uses the power of language to
satisfy his own needs. Cassius, who is an impulsive Roman general and long time
acquaintance of Caesar, uses manipulation and language to deceive others into thinking he
is an honourable and worthy man; and both demonstrate how using manipulation and
language as a weapon can only lead to the downfall of others or one's self. In Shakespeare's
Julius Caesar ​the characters Mark Antony and Cassius illustrate how manipulation and
power of language is used as a weapon to change one's perspective about a situation.
Mark Antony is an example of how language is used to change one's perception
about a situation. One uses power of language to persuade others to do what they wish.
This is demonstrated when Antony says: “ And am, morever, suitor that I may / produce his
body to the market-place, / and in the pulpit, as becomes a friend, speak in order of his
funeral.” ( iii, i , 227-230) ). Anthony explains to Brutus that he should be able to bring
his body to the marketplace and stand on the platform to give a proper funeral oratation as a
friend should. This is where he later takes advantage of the opportunity, and convinces the
Roman citizens Brutus is not as honourable as they perceive him to be. One also uses
emotional language that could lead to the downfall of others. When Antony says, “ for
Brutus, as you know, was Caesar’s angel / Judge, O you Gods how dearly Caesar lov’d him”
( iii, ii, 179-180 ) while he is giving his speech. He means that Caesar would have done
almost anything for him and is trying to make the audience feel guilty; believing that Brutus
betrayed someone who truly loved him. Therefore, Mark Antony is an example of how
manipulation and language is used to change one’s perception when one thinks differently.
Cassius also demonstrates the use of manipulation and power of language. One
persuades others using flattery to satisfy one’s needs. When Cassius is talking to Brutus,
trying to convince him to join the conspirators he says ”Brutus and caesar: what should be
in that ‘caesar’? / Why should the name be sounded more than yours?” ( i, ii, 142-143 ).
Cassius seems to think that playing on his desire for personal glory, He can convince Brutus
to join the conspirators. One uses the power of language to convince others he is the better
person. When Cassius says: “Pardon Caesar! Caesar, pardon! / As low as to thy foot doth
Cassius fall / to beg enfranchisement for publius cimber” ( iii, i, 56-58 ) when he is in front of
Caesar; Cassius is flattering him while he is begging on his knees for CImber not to be
banished. Cassius is making himself appear vulnerable to the other conspirators and Caesar
to deceive them into thinking he is the better person. In conclusion, Cassius persuades
others using flattery, and convinces them he is the better person.
Therefore, Antony and Cassius demonstrate how manipulation and power of
language is used as a weapon of mind control and abuse of power. Antony uses
manipulation and language to get what he wishes, which can lead to the downfall of
others. However, Cassius uses language and flattery to satisfy his needs and
convinces others he is honourable. Furthermore, in Shakespeare’s ​Julius Caesar​,
Antony and Cassius truly represent how easily language can be used as an influence
to change one’s perception about a situation.
​Work Cited
Shakespeare, William.​Julius Caesar. ​Toronto: Oxford University Press 2010. print.

More like Nd Power Of Language In William Shakespeare's Julius Caesar - Bishop Ryan Grade 11 - Essay

Evaluating The Rhetoric Of Mark Antony In Shakespeare's Julius Caesar

889 words - 4 pages ... Evaluating the Rhetoric of Mark Antony in Shakespeare's Julius Caesar In Shakespeare's Julius Caesar, Cassius and Brutus, along with other statesmen, conspire to murder Caesar. Following the murder, Brutus delivers a strong oration to his fellow Roman citizens explaining that he and his fellow statesmen assassinated Caesar because he was overly ambitious. Following Brutus's oration, Mark Antony delivers a rebuttal that exemplifies a mastery of ...

Essay On Manipulation In Julius Caesar

1158 words - 5 pages ... In the play "Julius Caesar", Shakespeare displays his characters as being manipulative and persuasive. This is illustrated in various parts of the play, such as at the beginning when Brutus was manipulated by Cassius, and then again when Antony manipulated the Roman citizens. Shakespeare first introduces the technique of manipulation and persuasion at the beginning of the play through the character of Cassius. Cassius had sinful plans in ...

The Use Of Flattery To Achieve Personal Gain In Julius Caesar - Brampton Christian School/english - Essay

1182 words - 5 pages ... Gill Simrit Gill Mr. Grabham ENG4U1-01 7 December 2018 The use of Flattery to Achieve Personal Gain in Julius Caesar The most prevalent form of manipulation is hidden in the form of flattery; it is also the most dangerous. Concealed agendas are typically cloaked in flattery; the subtle nature of it makes it most powerful when served to those who yearn for it. William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, expresses the theme of using flattery to achieve ...

Essay About Who's The Protagonist In Julius Caesar (with Quotations)

1545 words - 7 pages ... Petit Edgard Petit Mr. Alain Gauthier EAE4U-01 November 8th 2018 Julius Caesar Essay According to Oxford Dictionaries, an antagonist is a person who actively opposes or is hostile to someone or something. In Williams Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, Cassius is the main antagonist. He is throughout the play, the one who is the most hostile against the idea of Julius Caesar becoming king of Rome. He is the driving force behind the conspiracy and the ...

An Example Of Question 2 In AQA Language 2 - Bishop - Essay

410 words - 2 pages ... An example for question 2 in AQA Language Paper 2 Eddie is a typical modern teenager who is mischievous and talks to his father in a 'mocking voice' emphasising their close relationship and good humour they share. Henry however is distant and more formal with his father addressing him in a respectful tone, 'my dear Father' emphasising the difference in status between them. From Source A we can see that Eddie is very care-free and this may be due ...

Don't Feed The Wolves: A Literary Analysis Of Shakespeare's "macbeth" - Grade 11 University English - Essay

1190 words - 5 pages ... roughly translates to “the wolf that wins is the wolf you feed.” In his perennial, supernatural tragedy ​Macbeth​ , William Shakespeare guilefully puppeteers a lethal myriad of battles amongst packs of ravenous canines; gory conjurings that exist exclusively within the cerebral confines of his dramatis personae. Cocooned within this shakespearean web of betrayal, treachery, witchcraft, and retribution is an explicit contemporary warning upon which a ...

The Prince And Julius Caesar Comparative Study - SSCBWB - Essay

1036 words - 5 pages ... All texts are ultimately the product of their own times where composers anchor their views from their social cultural times into their texts. Niccolo Machiavelli’s 1513 political treatise, The Prince explores the need for a leader to sacrifice morality and advocate the use of pragmatism and political expediency in order to obtain and maintain power. In contrast, William Shakespeare’s 1599 Roman tragedy, Julius Caesar, offers a cautionary ...

Act II, Julius Caesar: Comparison Of Relationship Between Brutus And Portia And Caesar And Calpurnia

2522 words - 11 pages ... Act II: Development of Relationships between Husbands and WivesRelationships between characters play a great part in Julius Caesar, the Shakespearean tragedy about the scheming of Caesar's death, which then are shown to affect all aspects of Roman life. Some relationships show the concealed discord between characters, some show the conniving spirit of those who desire power, while others show how some hearts are devoted entirely to the greater ...

Assessing The Reasons Why Henry VII Was Able To Reduce The Power Of The Nobility - Dhahran School / Grade 11 - Essay

1066 words - 5 pages ... dynasty. It is however essential to acknowledge that Henry did not always achieve his foreign policy aims in this first period, as demonstrated by France’s annexation of Brittany, which demonstrated her great power status. Henry’s attempts to support the Bretons through both the Treaty of Redon (in which he sent 6,000 soldiers) and the invasion of France in 1492 were both unsuccessful, with Henry forced to acknowledge France’s military ...

Handmaids Tale: Power Of Language - High School - Essay

1205 words - 5 pages ... ‘The pen between my fingers is sensuous, alive almost, I can feel its power of the words it contains’ Discuss the power of language in Margaret Atwood’s novel ‘The Handmaid’s Tale’ 3- 4 body paragraphs. Essential: Must reference historical notes In The Handmaids Tale, Margaret Atwood positions her audience to see how governments abuse their power, exposing the way individual autonomy is often compromised for governments interests. Atwood has ...

Nature Of Kingship In The Play Macbeth - Grade 11 - Literary Essay

864 words - 4 pages ... Alexandra During FAT 6.1 Literary Essay The nature of kingship In the era of the book, a King is considered to be god’s representative on earth and is supposed to have positive characteristics. Shakespeare details the characteristics of the leaders, both good and bad, and analyses their actions as kings. There is a contrast shown between the natures of kingship of the four different Kings namely, regarding their power, loyalty and honesty, which ...

Development Of The Self In Society - Grade 11 - Research

1639 words - 7 pages ... may be discriminated against because of their age, disability, ethnicity, origin, political belief, race, religion, sex or gender, sexual orientation, language, culture and on many other grounds. Discrimination, which is often the result of prejudices people hold, makes people powerless. 3.2 Show how these principles strengthen democracy. Democracy is a key condition for living in dignity and freedom. The rule of law, the protection of human ...

Liberation From Sexism And Patriarchy In The Color Purple - Caesar Rodney High School, Adv. Lit 11 - Essay

1826 words - 8 pages Free ... Hammond Mary Hammond Advanced Literature 11 Ms. Tuke 16 March 2018 Liberation From Sexism and Patriarchy in The Color Purple From the earliest of civilized societies, both, men and women have had separated roles in society. Oftentimes it is the man who is placed as the head of the household, leader of a community, or ruler of a nation. In relation, women are often given the household duties, such as, raising and educating children, cooking ...

Taming Of The Shrew Gender Discussion - Grade 11 English - Essay

883 words - 4 pages ... George Selivanov Ms. Lascos ENG3U1 Nov. 22, 2018 Gender in Different Periods of Culture Definition of gender completely changes over time, and it has done so in the past. It has also been the same in Taming of the Shrew, by William Shakespeare. Back before women were treated with equality, in the times of kings and queens, definition of gender was way different than it is now. Secondly, women have their own feelings, which nobody cared about ...

Power And Manipulation In Animal Farm By George Orwell And Lord Of The Flies By William Golding

959 words - 4 pages ... Themes of power and manipulation are evident in George Orwell's allegory Animal Farm, based on the Russian revolution with animals representing the major players in the debacle, as well as Lord of the Flies, by William Golding, where young children are stranded on a tropical island without any adults or authority figure. Both show how individuals are trapped by their leaders, namely Napoleon and Jack Merridew and their respective followers, who ...