100+ Results for Microsoft Visio

Mozilla Doesn't Like the Way Windows 7 Boosts Internet Explorer

We've reported before on the declining market share that Microsoft's Internet Explorer browser is experiencing as it competes with innovative open source browsers, particularly Firefox. That's been complemented by a very aggressive effort from the European Commission to force Microsoft to offer more choices in browsers on its Windows operating system. The biggest news of all on the Microsoft front at the moment is its upcoming Windows 7 operating system, slated to ship later this year. It's been getting good reviews, and is predicted by some to rejuvenate the company after the shaky ride that Windows Vista has had. Now, though, Mozilla chairperson Mitchell Baker is charging that Windows 7 gives Microsoft unfair advantages in the browser battles.


What If Windows 7 Starter Isn't Meant to Just Stop Linux on Netbooks?

Over at ComputerWorld, Seth Weintraub waxes poetic about Microsoft's decision to offer a Windows 7 Starter edition to keep its presence strong in the netbook arena, and why this is a huge advantage for Google's Linux-based Android.

Windows 7 Starter edition is designed to run no more than three applications simultaneously -- purchasing an upgrade allows users to run, presumably, as many apps as their netbooks can handle at one time. Now, three concurrent applications at a shot might be sufficient for a number of users; it might be all that some netbooks can handle, depending on the applications and system resources running in the background. Microsoft isn't hiding the fact it is experimenting with a limited Starter, and hopefully netbook manufacturers will also make buyers aware of this. But awareness and being almost sufficient in even most cases is irrelevant. It's the concept that there is a limit, and purchasing an upgrade for functionality that most won't need every day (but when it's needed, it's really needed) that will make netbooks running alternative operating systems increasingly attractive. It's an advantage not only for Android, but any Linux distribution netbook builders optimize for their hardware.



OStatic Buffer Overflow

Does Microsoft change prices at OEMs to block GNU/Linux sales? An allegedly leaked memo appears to show so.

Should an open source license ever be patent-agnostic? That's the question posed by a new license under review.

Where did Sun go wrong? One of Silicon Valley's biggest innovators faces a tough road alone after walking away from a deal with IBM.

Canonical vs. Microsoft: A netbook cat fight. Canonical is dismissing Microsoft's netbook market share claims.

The netbook newbie's guide to Linux. Wrestling with Linpus on a netbook.



Canonical Offers OEMs Recipe for Healthy Linux Netbook Sales

A short piece on Xbit Labs directed me to an interesting post by Chris Kenyon, Canonical's Director of Business Development. In this piece, Kenyon tackles another absolutely critical factor in marketing Linux netbooks (I discussed a few of the others on Tuesday) -- offering quality engineered hardware and carefully configured software that's ready to go, right out of the box.

Kenyon's post offers advice and points to consider to OEMs, consumers, and yes, even Microsoft. It's sound, it's reasoned -- perhaps to the point one wonders why it needed to be said -- and it paints an encouraging picture of the future for Linux netbooks.



Does Open Source Mean a Race to Zero, Threatening Industry?

Here is yet another post arguing that open source software introduces a pricing race to zero that threatens the entire software industry, especially commercial efforts within it. It's from Gene Quinn, a patent attorney, writing for IP Watchdog. Dana Blankenhorn has an interesting reaction post up, in which he argues that open source doesn't drive all costs to zero, but that costs become shared. I agree with Blankenhorn, but there are several other fundamental problems with Quinn's argument.


Silver Lining in Microsoft/TomTom Settlement: TomTom Didn't Stand Alone

Jim Zemlin at the Linux Foundation has a good reaction piece up today to the news of TomTom's settlement with Microsoft in their patent fight. We covered TomTom's countersuit against Microsoft, and the fundamental issues here. Dana Blankenhorn's take on the settlement was that it seems pretty clear the company [TomTom] has surrendered, and Paula Rooney at ZDNet characterizing the settlement as David losing to Goliath. Zemlin sees the result of this dispute as evidence that Microsoft's new openness is not necessarily so open, but there is a silver lining.


TomTom and Microsoft Settle Suits (and Countersuits): Is it Over?

The patent dispute between automotive GPS manufacturer TomTom and Microsoft has come to a close, with both sides settling the original suit and countersuit. CNet has a short but informative summary of at least some of the terms (certain financial specifics were not disclosed). The terms are written in order to preserve TomTom's compliance with its obligations under the GPL v.2 licenses on its code. TomTom must also remove functionality from its products that are related to the two file management systems that were under contention in the suit.

This is, at least for the upcoming agreed-upon five year period, how it will be between TomTom and Microsoft. It's been settled, and very little (at least from the Microsoft and TomTom camps), has been officially said about the three patents that dealt with TomTom's implementation of the Linux kernel. It's over, but have the final notes been sung?



OStatic Buffer Overflow

Boxee adds Pandora Radio and hints at the future. The open source media center application's Pandora feature is brilliant, and there's more in a new alpha.

Awesome Tweet: Peter Rojas says Flash coming to Android. The development house BSQUARE has been hired to port Flash to the Android platform.

Shifty answers from Microsoft at OSBC? Some of the company's answers to open source questions sounded like mumbo-jumbo.

Gone but not forgotten: 10 operating systems the world left behind. Some people miss OS/2.

Launching a Linux startup: no funny business. Hackett and Bankwell is a series of cartoon manuals that teaches readers how to get started with Linux.

?Sun crams the Internet in a box. Three petabytes of archived web pages.?



"They Started It!" -- TomTom Countersues Microsoft

In February, Microsoft filed suit against TomTom, claiming that the portable GPS manufacturer had violated eight of its patents. Three of the patents in question dealt in some manner with TomTom's implementation of the Linux kernel.

While Microsoft's Horacio Gutierrez stated the lawsuit is between TomTom and Microsoft, and not an attack on the Linux kernel as whole, many in the open source world are wary. The Linux Foundation's Executive Director, Jim Zemlin, has said that it would be prudent to keep an eye on the situation, but there was no reason to get overly excited, yet.

TomTom has made the next move, lending some credence to the Gutierrez's it's just between the two of us claims. On Monday, TomTom filed a countersuit in the US Court District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. TomTom alledges that Microsoft violated its intellectual property (though sources vary on the number of patents involved) in its Streets and Trips products.



Genivi's Open Source Car Infotainment Efforts Ramping Up

The recently announced non-profit Genivi Alliance is shaping up to be an interesting effort to build an open source platform for infotainment in cars. Some have speculated that it may represent a threat to efforts from Microsoft and others to provide automotive infotainment platforms and applications, but in this video Grahem Smethurst, chairman of the alliance, makes clear that what Genivi is working on is intended for others to build on, and claims it is not intended as a threat to proprietary players.?Genivi has had the cooperation of Intel and BMW since 2006, and could create a promising new platform if it plays its cards right.


View Page: 1 2 3 4 5next