OStatic

The U.S. Supreme Court will be hearing oral arguments on Bilski vs. Kappos on Monday, November 9th. Not surprisingly, many open source advocates are on the edge of their seats because it's an opportunity for the Supreme Court to decide that software is not patentable. Confused about the details? As part of its mission to advance Free, Libre, and Open Source Software (FLOSS) through law-related services, the Software Freedom Law Center (SFLC) has provided a backgrounder with information on briefs filed by parties of interest to the FLOSS community.

When a small Canadian company, i4i, recently won a $290 million judgment against Microsoft, much was made of the accompanying decree that Microsoft had 60 days to stop selling Microsoft Word in its current version. At issue were Custom XML-related patents that i4i defended. Microsoft has been very critical of the court's decision in the case, claiming that blocking the sale of Microsoft Word will also obstruct the sales of Microsoft Office, threatening industry. Microsoft is also set to appeal the court's decision on September 23rd.

Some in the open source community have interpreted the brouhaha as a big opportunity for open source software suites such as OpenOffice, and open standards such as Open Document Format (ODF). I'm in agreement with Andy Updegrove, though, who argues that the whole confrontation may be a tempest in a teapot.

Red Hat issued a statement this morning that is has settled a patent litigation lawsuit with Firestar Software and DataTern, saying it protects Red Hat's current customers and sets a precedent for the open source community at large. Firestar initiated a lawsuit againt Red Hat in 2006 over its newly acquired JBoss technology, claiming patent violations relating to Hibernate 3, a high performance object/relational persistence and query service. Firestar claimed...