ZFS is a system of automatically replicating file servers closely resembling CODA.  [edit]  


Project Details

AUDIENCE : system administrator
information technology : DEVELOPMENT STATUS : pre-alpha
LICENSE : apache software license
OPERATING SYSTEM : bsd
Linux2 : posix : unix : windows 2000 : windows 2003 : windows 95 : windows 98 : windows nt : windows xp : PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE : Python
C : USER INTERFACE : non-interactive (daemon)

Attribution :

Information obtained from users, and repositories like FLOSSmole, Wikipedia, Apache, Codehaus, Tigris and several others. Please inform us of any errors, objections or omissions. You can find our terms of service here.
more details


Users

zfs
Be the first to add!


Alternatives



    Screenshots


    If you are a member, to have your comment attributed to you. If you are not yet a member, Join OStatic and help the Open Source community.


    Recent zfs activity

         

    Apple Scuttles ZFS: Community Picks it Up

    In like a lion, out like a Snow Leopard? Apple changed its spots on Sun's ZFS fairly quickly. This week the company shutterd the ZFS Project on Mac OS Forge, and there's no hide or hair of ZFS to be found in Snow Leopard. It's a pretty quick turnabout from a few years ago, when Sun CEO Jonathan Schwartz was touting Apple's inclusion of ZFS in Leopard.



    OpenSolaris Arrives in a New Version

    In conjunction with its CommunityOne event, Sun Microsystems has announced a new version of its OpenSolaris operating system. Dubbed OpenSolaris 2009.06, it features networking improvements, storage management and virtualization features. Here's more on what's under the hood, and how Sun will proceed with a free open source version of OpenSolaris, and a paid version featuring new lower support fees.



    Getting Acquainted With the ext4 File System

    The majority of computer users don't spend much time thinking about the file system their operating system uses. Granted, people installing alternative operating systems might give more consideration to the available file systems than the general population -- unless there's a specific need for a certain file system, many go with their distribution's default option.

    While your file system type isn't something you should need to think about regularly, and making an informed choice for machines with specialized, dedicated tasks is important, usually choosing the default file system type for your operating system is fine. Several Linux distributions (including Fedora and Ubuntu) are planning to move their default file systems from ext3 to ext4 in upcoming releases, while a number of distributions already (or will soon) support ext4 as a file system option.

    IBM has a (rather surprisingly) interesting look at what's different about the ext4 file system, including details on why some changes were made, and how moving from ext3 to ext4 works.



    Sponsor Gallery

    Career Center

    Posted: Nov. 8, 2009

    Posted: Nov. 7, 2009

    Posted: Nov. 7, 2009

    Posted: Nov. 6, 2009

    Posted: Nov. 6, 2009