Essay On Abortion Laws In Queensland School Essay

1871 words - 8 pages

Right To Choose, Right To Voice
For countless of generations, society has placed their own opinions on the issue of abortion. The majority of the society have declared abortion as unethical, unjust and inequitable, whilst the government continuously maintains the abortion provisions in the Queensland legislation unchanged. This controversial issue positions many medical doctors who procure the abortion as criminals since terminating a women’s pregnancy is in violation of laws in Queensland. This essay will thoroughly examine the effectiveness of the current legislation in place associated with abortion and conclude with appropriate reforms reflecting societal values and beliefs, aimed at addressing the inadequate protection of women’s reproductive rights and medical practitioners who procure the abortion.
Most states and territories have currently legalised abortions in Australia, although each state complies with different policies on how late term abortions can be carried out. In Queensland and New South Wales, many women face legal difficulties with the government in attempt of accessing abortion services, given that it is a crime to terminate a pregnancy without legitimate justification. Abortion in legal terms, is the premature termination of a pregnancy via an artificial or surgical procedure to destroy or remove a fetus (World Health Organisation, 2016). Although, there is on no account the exact number of abortions each year in Queensland specified, it is anticipated to be somewhere between 10,000 and 14,000 abortions each year. and that half of all pregnancies in Australia are terminated and half of those are unplanned (Children by Choice, 2012). Abortion remains in the Criminal Code Act in full in Queensland, contained in three primary sections, 224, 225 and 226, declaring it a crime to perform an abortion, access an abortion, or supply drugs to be used in an abortion and for a medical professional to carry out the procedure. Section 224 of the Queensland Criminal Code 1899 (Qld) explicitly states,
“Any person who, with intent to procure the miscarriage of a woman, whether she is or is not with child, unlawfully administers to her or causes her to take any poison or other noxious thing, or uses any force of any kind, or uses any other means whatever, is guilty of a crime, and is liable to imprisonment for 14 years.”
However, because of precedent cases in Queensland (R v Bayliss and Cullen, 1985), it has been established that abortion is legal if the birth of the child or the pregnancy will greatly impact the mother’s physical, mental, or emotional health. To expand the limits of abortion, any person who unlawfully supplies to procure the miscarriage of a women can be liable to imprisonment up to 3 years if discovered guilty, outlined in Section 226 of the Queensland Criminal Code 1899 (Qld);
“Supplying drugs or instruments to procure abortion. Any person who unlawfully supplies to or procures for any person anything whatever, knowing that it is intended to be unlawfully used to procure the miscarriage of a woman, whether she is or is not with child, is guilty of a misdemeanour, and is liable to imprisonment for 3 years.”
Nonetheless, Section 282 of the Criminal Code Act 1899 was amended under the same legislation in September 2009, providing a defence for doctors who are charged for procuring an abortion they deem for the ‘preservation of the mother’s life’ (Brisbane Times, 2016). Section 282 further states, ‘A person is not criminally responsible for performing or providing, in good faith and with reasonable care and skill a surgical operation on or medical treatment of; a person or unborn child for the patient’s benefit; or a person or unborn child to preserve the mother’s life’. Under the current state law, an abortion becomes legally permitted when conducted by a medical practitioner who believes continuing the pregnancy will prevent serious threat to the woman’s life or the physical or mental health of the patient. (Children by Choice, 2012).
There are two main types of abortion procedures undertaken; medical and surgical abortion and are both used widely throughout Australia. Surgical abortion is one of the most frequently operated and safest surgical procedures within Australia, with approximately 80,000 women undergoing this procedure each year (Marie Stopes AU, 2016). The medical practitioner inserts a tiny tube able to enter the uterus to remove the substances and the lining of the uterus. On the other hand, medical abortion has been recently more accessible in Australia, being as a non-surgical abortion option which is available to most women up to 9 weeks gestation. The drug RU486 is a form of contraception, though unlike other contraception pills, can be distributed by medical doctors to terminate the pregnancy even after it has begun (RU486 Facts, 2013). This popular medication can be consumed for abortions, however, under the Queensland’s legislation the drug becomes illegal for use to terminate a pregnancy.
The abortion laws create various arguments within the legislation causing concern amongst the wider community as they are being labelled ambiguous and outdated in Queensland. A major legal issue with abortion laws in Queensland, is the restriction placed upon women by not allowing them to make individual choices of their bodies, for instance the termination of a pregnancy. In 2009, Auspoll conducted a survey with over 1000 Queenslanders revealing that 4 out of 5 respondents voted for abortion to become legal in Queensland. Furthermore, The Australian Survey of Social Attitudes found that 81% of the partakers believed an abortion should be decided by the women carrying the unborn child (AuSSA, 2010). These surveys demonstrate that Australians intend to change the legislation, so that women are free to choose if they willing to undertake an abortion or not. In Australia, Queensland and NSW are the only states that still maintain criminal sanctions against abortion. Whilst in Northern Territory, Victoria, Western Australia and Tasmania, abortion is legal up to a certain time period, and is still legal in both Victoria and Tasmania if a woman can obtain two doctor’s approval (Children by Choice, 2012). In the Australia Capital Territory, abortion is lawful if it is authorised by a medical doctor, and in South Australia, abortion is legal if two doctors agree that a woman’s physical and/or mental health is endangered by the pregnancy (Children by Choice, 2012). Additionally, abortion is legally permitted in Queensland under the circumstances that a woman’s health, physical or mental, is in serious risk, likewise in NSW, economic and social factors are also considered. The current Queensland abortion laws limit women’s rights to have their own individual choice, contrary to other Australian states and territories where women’s rights to freely choose to have an abortion are protected to some degree creating inconsistency throughout Australia.
The question of when an abortion is lawful in Queensland is still very unclear and ambiguous, creating another issue for doctors to be very restrained on providing abortion or information to patients. Under the Queensland Criminal Code Act 1899 (Qld), the medical practitioner and anybody else supporting the woman’s abortion are liable to be prosecuted anytime. A high-profile case related to this issue was the R v Bayliss and Cullen 1985 case, where two medical doctors were prosecuted for procuring illegal abortions contrary to section 224 of the Queensland Criminal Code 1899. The Greenslopes control clinic had over 20,000 women seeking terminations which were being treated by both doctor Bayliss and Cullen (Children by Choice, 2012). However, the high court declared the files of each patient to be returned after being raided by the police, as the warrant search against the clinic was considered invalid. The director of the Prosecutions then publicly requested to any of the patients unsatisfied to come forward. A 21-year-old mother complained about a termination of a pregnancy that was performed at the clinic, resulting with Doctor Bayliss and Cullen to be recharged under Section 224 of the Queensland Criminal Code 1899 for procuring an illegal abortion. After the conclusion of the trial, both doctors were not guilty on both accounts, as Judge McGuire ruled that an abortion is considered lawful when performed to ‘preserve a woman from a serious danger to her life or physical or mental health (Children by Choice, 2012).
Due to Queensland’s legislation, the production and consumption of medication RU486 is prohibited, forcing many women pursing abortion to go interstate yet creating another obstacle for women in remote areas. The drug is not available for use after 9 weeks of gestation, yet adding concern of the mother’s emotional state. Medical abortion does not technically fall under surgical abortion indicating the lack of clarity within Section 282 of the Queensland Criminal Code 1899. These laws contradict each other, making abortion laws in Queensland very complex and unclear, violating another principle of an effective law.
Abortion laws in Queensland are currently under question because of its applicability to meet society’s need, which many claims no longer hold any social value. Whilst the abortion laws have existed in Queensland’s legislation since 1899, many believe it is essential for it to change and be reformed to reflect societal values and beliefs. The Queensland Criminal Code 1899 (Qld) values the right of the unborn child’s life and supports pro-life advocates through criminalising abortion. The ostensible reason to keeping abortion illegal in Queensland, is that doing so would minimize the number of abortions every year. However, changing and reforming these laws will only allow the legislation to have a single purpose, according to the World Health Organisation, “abortion does not end when it is illegal”. The results only become worse, spurring women to pursue potentially lethal abortions (Newyorker, 2016). In Queensland 2009, Medicare’s records revealed that 15,500 abortions occurred in just that year, yet abortion is illegal in Queensland, showing how easily the law can be manipulated (Children by Choice, 2012). Legalising abortion will not increase the number of abortions but will instead prevent innocent women becoming vulnerable to prosecution. Following one national law will decrease the numbers of people who travel interstate to receive an abortion, as well as clearing the inconsistency within Queensland’s legislation. This will also assist medical doctors who are vulnerable to being prosecuted, since the abortion laws are unclear and ambiguous on when doctors perform abortions in Queensland, however Section 282 of the Criminal Code Act 1899 (Qld) offers some protection for doctors who are charged for procuring illegal abortions. Therefore, due to the number of contradictions, exceptions and interpretations within the law allowing for the legislation of abortion for unfortunate and helpless situations, Queensland legislation should be reformed to legalise abortion. However, restrictions should be applied to determine whether the reason to abort is justified and that medical doctors who perform abortion are reasonably justified to preserve the mother’s life.
In conclusion, the main sections 224 and 226 of the Criminal Code Act should be reformed and repealed to assure women’s reproductive rights and medical practitioners are appropriately protected in Queensland. The government continuously regulating to abortion through its criminal legislation will only serve to contradict women’s authority to decide as individuals. Subsequently, to guarantee women are given the autonomy on making self-decisions affecting their own lives, abortion legislation and regulations should primarily refocus on protecting women’s well-being and indorsing adoption instead of killing the unborn child and facing criminalisation and punishment as the single resolution.
Rene Law

RELATED

essay topic abortion in the US - fallbridge high school englishh 9 - essay

697 words - 3 pages Henry Meade Writers Workshop Ms. Ryan 6/19/15 Should Abortion be Legal Worldwide in The Result of Rape and Incest In our society, abortion is a very debatable subject. Depending on the location in the world, people have different beliefs regarding abortion. Should abortion be legal worldwide in the result of rape or incest? Many countries have denied people the right to have an abortion, no matter what the case is, but some states in the U.S

Examination of the Queensland criminal law on abortion - legal studies - legal studies

1089 words - 5 pages ://www.spectator.com.au/2018/03/ten-non-religious-reasons-against-abortion/ Sundstrom, K., & McKechnie, K. (2018). Will Queensland follow Ireland in moves to lift the ban on abortions?. Retrieved from http://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-05-29/queensland-abortion-laws-review-underway/9807590 Abortion Law in Australia – Parliament of Australia. (2018). Retrieved from https://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Parliamentary_Departments/Parliamentary_Library/pubs/rp

Epidemiology The Appraisal essay - Queensland University - Essay

4814 words - 20 pages medicine, 46(1), 30-40. Remember, you are assessing the study which is described, and not this single publication. QUALITY ASSESSMENT TOOL FOR QUANTITATIVE STUDIES Please complete these the questions presented as structured paragraphs as you would in an essay. Highlight your selection or cross-out the choice not applicable. Demonstrate your knowledge of epidemiological principles within each section and support your statements. Show the structured

The 21 Irrefutable Laws of Leadership - School Assignment - Essay

662 words - 3 pages The 21 Irrefutable Laws of Leadership by John Maxwell is a book that presents the author’s expert leadership experiences. Maxwell (2007) presents some valuable insights in the form of laws that seek to inform a leader and motivate a leader on how to progress successfully. Thus, some of the laws employed by the author in explicating his leadership experiences include lid, influence, process, navigation, law of E.F Hutton, solid ground, respect

Negative Gearing in Australia's Housing Sytem - Queensland University of Technology - Essay

2199 words - 9 pages Free SWB108 Australian Society, Systems and Policies Assessment Task 2 Essay The Role of Negative Gearing in Australia’s Housing System Name: Brittany Brooking Student number: 10139648 Due date: Friday October 26 Word count: 1861 words 2 Under Article 25(1) of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, adequate housing is listed as a basic human right everyone is entitled to (United Nations, 1948). For many Australians, this need is not being met

abortion argument should we ban abortion in the united states - english - essay

1939 words - 8 pages Rethinking Abortion Advocacy written by Coleman Hugh Last Tuesday, the Governor of Alabama signed the most restrictive anti-abortion bill in America into law. The new law bans abortions even in the case of rape and makes performing an abortion a Class A felony, punishable by up to 99 years in prison. Despite the low probability of this law going into effect, it has provoked a slew of commentary from both sides of the aisle. To call it

Problem and shortcoming of Queensland not having a De facto relationship Act - All Saints Anglican School - Essay

3103 words - 13 pages Free laws themselves/ the state laws and the Commonwealth Act? 2.2 Comparison of Commonwealth Act and Australian State Laws The Commonwealth Powers (De Facto) Act 2003 is currently in effect in Queensland, which defines a De facto relationship as a marriage-like relationship (other than a legal marriage) between 2 persons. States like Northern Territory, Western Australia and Tasmania have a similar definition regarding De facto relationship while New

Abortion In the USA , illegal ? - Social Science - Essay

1995 words - 8 pages Abortion Introduction There are number of topics which are currently under debate and are focused on global level for the discussions and arguments. Different people having different perspective have their own arguments in the favor or against these topics. Among them one of the most debatable topic is feminism. This is a concept that bring up multiple new topics into the spot light and make them the biggest issues or concerns of the world. Such

essay on the pros and cons of abortion - Womans studies - essay

4660 words - 19 pages half of all pregnancies are unintended, and about four in 10 of these are terminated by abortion. Twenty-two percent of all pregnancies end in abortion. Each year, 2% of women of childbearing age (15–44 years) have an abortion. Most of the research on abortion focuses on the impact of antiabortion laws enacted by states to reduce the incidence of abortion. Of equal interest is the question of whether states with restrictive abortion laws also have

Counter claim essay about abortion - Clara Barton - Abortion

418 words - 2 pages Free believe that women should be given the right to abortion. I take this side in the debate because in my opinion this also plays a part in a women having the right to control their body. When having a debate about on the topic of abortions people focus too much on one aspect, which is the life of the baby. There is more to this topic and as to why women should be given the right to do so. Women also have to think about if this is the best choice for

Second wave of Feminism in Canada: contribution to the passing of gender-discrimination laws - History - Essay

1644 words - 7 pages law and not only by other women. [11: Ibid] Thirdly, the passing of more liberal abortion laws is a clear example of the contribution of the Second Wave towards family issues. In 1968, the Criminal Code was amended so that women could have access to abortion as long as a committee of doctors sign off that it’s necessary for the well-being of the mother, whether it was physically or mentally. [footnoteRef:12] It is clear that this was a very

Does a strict adherence to moral laws serve a just outcome in Billy Budd - Literature - Essay

927 words - 4 pages Free In Isaac In Mr. Bustos Literature 2 November 2018 Billy Budd essay In determining a just outcome for a case, one must ponder the extent martial law has and the concept of moral laws. In Billy Budd by Herman Melville, the strict adherence to martial laws does not serve Billy Budd a just outcome in his case. A strict adherence to martial law, which morals do not influence, can not deliver this judgement due to justice being a generalized concept

Racketeering Laws in Italy, Russia and the USA - Law/KCI - Essay

1175 words - 5 pages to struggles with logistics. Difficulties arose in determining what it meant to "belong" to a Mafia-type organization and so on. Nevertheless the Mafia's widespread influence over the Italian social and political infrastructure has proven to be a considerable obstacle to implementing and enforcing effective laws against organized crime. Finally, Russia has made the least amount of progress with regards to reprimanding criminals involved in

Persuasive essay on drugs in school - Eng 123 SNHU - Persuasive essay

741 words - 3 pages violates children’s rights. As for me, I believe that drug testing in schools is a good idea. There are drug dealers in every school. They provide children with drugs and make them steal money and valuable things at home. Obviously, young students do not have enough money on drugs. Thus, they have to steal it somewhere. As a result, drug abuse is closely connected with robberies and assaults. It is vital to prevent such antisocial behavior as soon as

Abortion Essay Moral or Immoral - St pauls college - Essay

1886 words - 8 pages acceptability of the activity. Please do not discuss existing laws in New Zealand or in other countries. Focus instead on what exactly (in relation to euthanasia or abortion) should be permitted and why. It is common to argue for a nuanced position, in other words, the moral permissibility of euthanasia or abortion, but only when certain criteria are met. Be sure to make it clear exactly what you are arguing for. In answering this question, make use of the