Ethical Decision That Truman Made To Drop The Atom Bomb Wcu Wrt 220 Essay

1522 words - 7 pages

Georgiy Soltanov
WRT 220
Time: 11:00-11:50
President Truman’s Decision
August 6th, 1945. That was the day the first atom bomb was used in war. Three days later, a second atomic bomb was dropped on the very same country. The result of this was the end of war between the USA and Japan. Unfortunately, another result of this was approximately 220,000 human lives that were killed because of only two bombs (“We Shouldn't”, 2016). A lot of time went into deciding whether or not the decision to drop the bombs was the right thing to do. In the end, President Truman and his advisors agreed that this was necessary to do and it was for the greater benefit of the United States of America. But, was it really the best decision? I strongly believe that President Truman should not have given the go-ahead to drop two atomic bombs in Japan. The reasons are that Japan was already surrendering, the Soviet Union was already on their way to fight Japan and the United States wouldn’t have lost a million lives if they didn’t drop the atomic bombs.
The first reason why President Truman should not have let the atomic bombs drop is because Japan had already basically surrendered. The only thing Japan wanted was to keep their emperor (Commentary, 2015). However, the United States wanted an unconditional surrender. The emperor of Japan was basically a figurehead and nothing more (Commentary,2015). He could be compared to the queen of England today. So for the United States not to take the conditioned surrender was not the right thing to do. Especially, since after they dropped the bombs, the United States made peace with Japan by letting them keep their emperor anyways (Commentary). The Chairman of the wartime Joint Chiefs of Staff, Admiral William D. Leahy was quoted saying “It is my opinion that the use of the barbarous weapon at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was of no material assistance in our war against Japan. The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender....” (“We Shouldn't “, 2016) Not only did Japan already ask for a surrender, but the Soviet Union was on their way to Japan. Stalin told Truman that his troops would be in Japan on August 15th, 1945 (“Was Dropping”, 2016). That’s a mere couple days after the bombs were dropped. If Japan was already surrendering with only the United States invading it, it would most certainly reconsider an unconditional surrender once the Soviet Union got there. That is if the United States was still so desperately wanting the unconditional surrender.
One of the reasons that the United States had dropped the atomic bombs was to send an assertive signal to the Soviet Union. If the United States wanted to establish dominance to the Soviet Union, they could have just dropped an atom bomb in an uninhabitable area. This would have shown the power of the weapon as well as wouldn’t have killed so many innocent civilians. The United States debated inviting some the Soviet scientists to the testing of the bomb but in the end decided not to for some reason. Speaking of civilians, the United States dropped both bombs in areas that were not of any huge military strategic significance. In fact, the atomic bombs were dropped in two cities that were not only mostly civilian populated but also densely populated with civilians. If anything, the United States could have dropped the atom bomb in or near Tokyo bay which would have sent a huge warning shot to Japan and most likely led them to an unconditional surrender. Tokyo bay would have been a really good spot to drop the atom bomb if the United States really wanted to drop it. Tokyo bay is a large open area and is right next to Tokyo which housed all of Japans leaders, including the emperor (Commentary, 2015). The United States had already made massive bombings in Europe and Japan that killed many civilians. Dropping the bomb in the Tokyo bay would have accomplished everything that dropping the atom bomb on a city would do, except without the thousands of casualties.
A second atom bomb was dropped in Nagasaki only days after the first was dropped on August 6th in Hiroshima. Japan did not even have enough time to understand what happened in Hiroshima since unlike what the United States said, there were no warnings issued of any nature to Japan about an atomic bomb being dropped (“Was Dropping” 2016). Japan would have most certainly surrendered in any fashion the United States wanted them to without the need of a second atom bomb. There was an estimate given by President Truman and others that if the atomic bombs were not dropped, it would have caused the United States around a million casualties. There were studies done and showed to the president at the time the bombs were dropped that the number of casualties would have been around 40,000-50,000(“We Shouldn't”, 2016) which is only 4-5% of the million casualties that was told to the public. The Japanese were already trying to surrender when United States dropped the bomb and the U.S. still ultimately gave them the terms they first refused. This makes the claim that the United States would have had to invade Japan highly unlikely.
Another reason that the United States justified dropping the atomic bombs was because they stated that all of Japan, including civilians would fight to the very end to uphold the Bushido Code (“Was Dropping” 2016). The Bushido code states that a true warrior must hold loyalty, courage, veracity, compassion, and honor as important, above all else (“Was Dropping” 2016). However with the day and night aerial bombings from the United States, lost battles and thousands of casualties before the atom bombs were even dropped, Japan, including its civilians had been run down and were already surrendering (“We Shouldn't”, 2016). Civilians upholding the Bushido code was really not a justified argument for why the atom bombs were dropped.
The atomic bomb caused chaos, despair and fear in the men, women and children of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. John Hershey writes about Mr. Tanimoto right after the atomic bomb fell in Hiroshima: “He was the only person making his way into the city; he met hundreds and hundreds who were fleeing, and every one of them seemed to be hurt in some way. The eyebrows of some were burned off and skin hung from their faces and hands. Others, because of pain, held their arms up as if carrying something in both hands. Some were vomiting as they walked. Many were naked or in shreds of clothing. On some undressed bodies, the burns had made patterns--of undershirt straps and suspenders and, on the skin of some women (since white repelled the heat from the bomb and dark clothes absorbed it and conducted it to the skin), the shapes of flowers they had had on their kimonos.” (Hersey, pg 29) The atomic bombs caused so much pain and suffering and for what cause? Japan had already asked for a surrender. Yes, they wanted to just keep the Emperor who was a figurehead and had no actual authority (Commentary, 2015). But, after the United States dropped the atomic bombs, they let Japan keep their Emperor anyway. Dropping the first bomb in Hiroshima was not enough for some reason to the United States since a few days later, a second one was dropped in Nagasaki. Before Japan even really knew what happened in Hiroshima due to all powerlines being destroyed (“Was Dropping” 2016) in Hiroshima, they were hit again in Nagasaki. As stated earlier, dropping even a single atomic bomb in Tokyo bay would have done everything that dropping two atomic bombs on a civilian population would have done, except without all the casualties. Dropping the bomb in Tokyo bay would have scared Japan into even an unconditional surrender. It would have also intimidated the Soviet Union and saved the United States from sending anymore of their military. All of which were big points for why the United States wanted to drop the atom bombs in the first place. The statistic about how the United States saved a million people was not true and just something Truman and others said to partially justify the killing of around 220,000 casualties (“We Shouldn't”, 2016). The reality was that by dropping the atomic bombs, the United States would have saved 5% of the figure that President Truman stood behind. I believe that President Truman should not have given authority to drop the atomic bombs in Japan. The results of it were catastrophic yet could have been avoided with several different other routes.
Works Cited
Commentary. "It’s Clear the US Should Not Have Bombed Hiroshima and Nagasaki." Quartz. N.p., 06 Aug. 2015. Web. 11 Oct. 2016.
Hersey, John, Warren Chappell, and Edith Goodkind Rosenwald. Hiroshima. New York: A.A. Knopf, 1946. Print.
"Was Dropping the Atomic Bombs a Crime Against Humanity?" The Liberty Web True Insight into World Affairs The Online Magazine. N.p., n.d. Web. 11 Oct. 2016.
"We Shouldn't Have Bombed Hiroshima." We Shouldn't Have Bombed Hiroshima. Spectacle, n.d. Web. 11 Oct. 2016.

RELATED

The Decision to Drop the Atom Bomb on Hiroshima

537 words - 3 pages and Truman was justified in dropping the bomb on them. When Truman decided to drop the bomb to save Allied lives, he was regarded highly among all the allies. Dropping the bomb on Japan saved what might have been thousands and thousands of Allied lives. This made the Allied leaders agree with his decision more than they did before. Before the Allies agreed with him they thought that dropping the bomb would too much of a massacre and they

U.S. History: Truman and the Atomic Bomb DBQ Essay - 11th Grade - Essay

431 words - 2 pages U.S. History: Truman and the Atomic Bomb DBQ Essay Mr. Lapierre/Mr. Lesser Name: Al-shareef Eyeadelrosiyhia Throughout American history there has been many turning points for our country. One of the most controversial ones was the decision made by U.S President Harry S. Truman to use atomic weapons on Japan. Many people believe that these actions were cruel and unnecessary, but there were others who thought that the actions were a smart military

Ethical Decision of Which Job to Take

408 words - 2 pages second company at any cost. I was tempted not to tell the second company about my future plans before joining them, but decided against it. I explained my dilemma and offered to work at a temporary position for virtually nothing. Although they looked skeptical, they offered me a job in the support department beginning on 15 June. I immediately grabbed the offer.My decision to be honest with the second firm saved me from considerable

Did The Military Situation Justify A Surprise Attack With The Atom Bomb?

593 words - 3 pages ahead and a threat. Truman decided upon its completion that he would save more American lives by dropping the atom bomb than by means of a land invasion due to the incredible spirit of the Japanese army.This is part of a three-part assignment. The other two pieces are Why did the U.S. drop the second bomb so close to the first? and Did the U.S. want to surprise Japan or the Soviet Union? Thank you for your time

Texts relating to the period After the Bomb - freshwater senior campus, year 12 - essay

1263 words - 6 pages “Texts relating to the period After the Bomb represent aspects of life that challenged or destroyed comfortable ways of thinking. To what extent has your study of texts shown this to be true?” The zeitgeist of the post-war era was an expansion of the modernist concepts of progress and change. The predominant discourse of power, known as the Cold War, embraced the fundamental ideological conflict between Capitalistic America and the Communist

Comparative Essay on The Truman Show - English - Essay

1720 words - 7 pages of a modern version. In both works, similarities can be found in the way both the prisoners and Truman are placed in a false reality and are both are being controlled. The prisoners and Truman both have been introduced in a false reality and unable to know of the truth due to the guards and producer that control them. However, both of these works deal with different ways of finding the truth where one is a forced discovery and one is made by

The Unjustifiable Use of the Atomic Bomb - American history - essay

1389 words - 6 pages justifiable is senseless. The arguments showed in this essay proves that the dropping of the atomic bombs were not justified. Bibliography “Reasons Against Dropping the Atomic Bomb.” History, 6 July 2018, www.historyonthenet.com/reasons-against-dropping-the-atomic-bomb. Alperovitz, Gar, and Sanho Tree. The Decision to Use the Atomic Bomb. Vintage Books, 1996. “Atomic Bomb Dropped on Hiroshima.” History.com, A&E Television Networks, 13 Nov. 2009, www.history.com/this-day-in-history/atomic-bomb-dropped-on-hiroshima. “The Decision to Drop the Bomb.” Ushistory.org, Independence Hall Association, www.ushistory.org/us/51g.asp.

Do You Consider That The Introduction Of The Citizen's Charter/Service First Initiatives Over The Past Decade Have Made Any Improvements To The Law Of Public Administration ?

1655 words - 7 pages The Citizen's Charter, originally launched in 1991, was set up with the aim of improving the quality and responsiveness of public services. People have no choice about whether they use a public service, for example, they cannot choose their local authority, their fire service or their Tax office. Therefore, the Conservative government believed that something had to be done to put the public sector under some sort of pressure, to improve its

1.) For What Reason Did President Truman Decide To Use Atomic Weapons To End The War In The Pacific?

557 words - 3 pages Truman used the atomic bomb to shortening the war in thePacific and to save the lives of Americans and to keepAmerican public opinion positive. Truman's defense inusing atomic weapons was that it protected and savedthousands of American lives and money that would havehad to been used to fight the war.I disagree with President Truman's reasoning in droppingan atomic weapon. I feel that Truman could have useddifferent tactics to get the Japanese

This Essay Discusses The Assumption, Made In The Crito, That "One Should Never Do Wrong In Return" Within The Context Of Civil Disobedience

869 words - 4 pages The topic I have chosen to discuss is as follows: Examine the assumption, made in the Crito, that "one should never do wrong in return, nor injure any person, whatever injury one has suffered at his hands" within the context of civil disobedience. I will show how civil disobedience must incorporate pointing out the weaknesses of society, while showing respect for the rest of society and its authorities.Civil disobedience is disobeying the unjust

Are there any arguments to be made that self-sufficiency is desirable? What would be the arguments of those who contend that trade in cultural relics should be strictly state-regulated?

395 words - 2 pages (Vinod K. Aggarwal)Dependency theorists have argued that declining terms of trade particularly declining prices of primary commodities without corresponding drops in prices of manufactured goods-could permanently impair the ability of developing countries to compete in the global economy. More radical theorists argued for a break with the capitalist world, suggesting that trade with rich, advanced capitalist countries will always be detrimental

An Essay On Oppenheimer's Morals VS. The Government On Building The Bomb For The Government

576 words - 3 pages New Mexico, a plutonium bomb was assembled and brought to the top of a tower. On July 16, the bomb was detonated, producing an intense flash of light seen by observers in bunkers up to 10 miles away and a fireball that expanded to 650 feet in two seconds. It grew to a height of more than 9 miles, boiling up in the shape of a mushroom. Forty seconds later, the blast of air from the bomb reached the observation bunkers, along with a long and

Social media has made the uk less democratic - Uni - Essay

2318 words - 10 pages within older people there is loads of fake news stories on Facebook and older people are more likely to believe it. It was also suggested that the rules for political campaigns online are unfit and should be made fit for its purpose. Referring back to the essay title, fake news is increasing more every day and it is very hard to keep under control this, this means that UK citizens are getting fake stories and are believing it making politics less

Explain The Difference Between GDI And GEM And Do You Think That These Measures Are Really Appropriate To Measure Women's Status And Decision-Making Power In The Arab Region

1512 words - 7 pages the Gender empowerment index is one that focuses on three variables that reflect women's participation in political decision-making, access to professional opportunities and earning power. A lot of Arab countries objected to this since these sub indexes are extremely low in Arab countries and do not substantially translate the realities of third world countries.In order to answer your question concerning whether these two measures are actually

Philosophy Is the Good Life an Ethical Life? - PHI2010 - essay

635 words - 3 pages Carson Garbrecht Intro to Philosophy Professor Koegler October 7, 2018 Is the Good Life an Ethical Life? Essentially, the primary objective of a philosophical ethic lies in its attempt to explain the justification of rationality within the context of the individualistic internal struggle, as well as how that molds our perception of right and wrong. This perception is then applied to a universal concept of truth that is unique to society. The