Evaluate The View That Utilitarianism Continues To Offer A Useful Way Of Resolving Moral Dilemmas St Ambrose College, 6fr Essay

1523 words - 7 pages

OLIVER NICHOLLS
Evaluate the view that Utilitarianism continues to offer a useful way of resolving moral dilemmas. Use knowledge and understanding across your course of study to answer this question.
In your response to this question, you must include how developments in religion and ethics have been influenced by one of the following:
· Philosophy of religion
· New testament studies
· The study of a religion
Utilitarianism is a relativist and consequentialist ethical argument based on the principle of utility that proposes that all actions must produce the greatest amount of pleasure for the greatest amount of people. The principle of utility, as mentioned above, is the basis of utilitarianism. The principle of utility suggests an action is ‘good’ if it brings about the greatest amount of pleasure and the least amount of pain for the greatest number. The founder of utilitarianism, Jeremy Bentham, thought this was essential in resolving moral dilemmas, as in Bentham’s eyes he felt that “nature has placed mankind under the governance of two sovereign masters, pleasure and pain” and therefore the quantity of each is important. Though this form of utilitarianism, quantitative utilitarianism, was founded by Bentham in the late 18th century, there have been many other scholars and moral philosophers that have created many other versions of utilitarianism that have use when solving moral dilemmas.
Bentham, along with the creation of quantitative utilitarianism, created a ‘calculus’ based upon seven criteria that Bentham believed could scientifically calculate pleasure , each segment of criteria is a step that puts an action into perspective to reach a so called final calculation. The seven criteria are: duration, intensity, propinquity, extent, certainty, purity, and fecundity. The felicific calculus, or hedonic calculus, allows situations to be scientifically calculated for the ‘best’ outcome. The calculus allows us to ‘scientifically’ explore the seven key features of situations providing a good analysis of a situation. It is also based on the principle of utility, which provides the best outcome for the majority, not for the few. However, arguably, although the calculus makes everyone equal, logically, we do not value everyone’s pleasure the same. This is a significant factor in moral decision making as we are more likely to sacrifice the unknown majority’s pleasure for your own or for friends and family. Similarly, the calculus is too extensive and complicated to be implemented into a busy life as it takes too long to make a decision following the seven criteria.
Although Bentham created utilitarianism, he formed a platform for other scholars to develop on his original idea, and the first person to do so was the Scottish philosopher and economist, John Stuart Mill. He had similar views on how utilitarianism can be used to solve moral dilemmas as instead of focusing on the quantity of pleasure created in a situation, Mill focused on the quality of the pleasure created. Mill believed the quality of the pleasure was more important and thus, he developed the theory of qualitative utilitarianism. Mill emphasised, and based his theory, upon the idea that there are many different ‘types’ of pleasure, and categorised these pleasures into two sections, ‘higher’ and ‘lower’ pleasures. His thought was that there is something different about pleasure of the mind such as art, music, literature, philosophy and bodily pleasures, alcohol and other material objects. He also recognises that we have a strong internal conviction that an action cannot be purely ‘right’ or ‘good’ based on the fact that it produces pleasure – other principles need to be considered. For Mill, the real moral approach involves the pursuit of these ‘higher’ mental goods: mental, cultural and spiritual.
However, Mill’s utilitarianism has its weaknesses. Firstly, people do not always strive for higher pleasures. This is because lower pleasures in many cases are more satisfactory and require little investment. The philosopher Henry Sidgwick identified a key problem when identifying this theory’s use for solving dilemmas; how, in practice, does one distinguish between higher and lower pleasures, and how does one distinguish one higher pleasure from another? If all cultural and spiritual activities provide the same sum of pleasure and happiness, presumably it does not matter which one we choose to undertake at any time. If reading Shakespeare and painting watercolours all produce the same degree of pleasure- there is nothing to choose between them. He also posed the question – where do physically and intellectually demanding pursuits, such as sailing, play acting, advanced Kung-Fu, fit into the higher/lower pleasures distinction? Sidgwick recognised that the difficulties are endless.
Though Mill and Bentham pioneered the first ideas about utilitarianism however there have been a number of modern utilitarian’s who posed their own forms of the theory which they believe can act as a way to solve dilemmas. Peter Singer, though not the founder, argues today for preference utilitarianism. He proposes a utilitarian system with the ‘best interests’ of the individuals concerned at the heart of the ethical decision making. Singer’s formulation of utilitarianism replaces ‘pleasure’ with ‘best interests’. He argues utilitarianism stands as an ethical system unless some non-utilitarian moral rules are proposed that come with good reasons for rejecting a purely utilitarian approach. Preference utilitarianism is a good moral dilemma solver as Singer also included minority groups into his theory – he felt that all minorities and individuals should be taken into account when considering what is best for everyone.
Furthermore, another notable utilitarian theory is Karl Popper’s: negative utilitarianism which instead prioritised the reduction of suffering above the maximisation of pleasure, and therefore, when approaching a situation, a person should make a decision that will produce the least amount of pain, regardless of pleasure. This theory has some practical value in that, for example, a starving community would benefit more from a reduction in its suffering, by means of food and medical care, than being sent a computer, or tickets to a concert.
However, advocates of more traditional forms of utilitarianism have suggested that the ultimate aim of negative utilitarianism would be to find the quickest and least painful method of killing the greatest number of people to put them out of their misery. Negative utilitarianism allows terrible acts such as these simply because the choice may produce a low amount of suffering. It also raises the question of how much suffering is too great. There are some goods that cannot be experienced without some degree of suffering, for example, to show compassion, a person needs to be in pain, so the reduction of all pain to a minimum would reduce the opportunity for human growth.
Act utilitarianism is often seen as the most natural interpretation of the utilitarian ideal. If our aim is always to produce the best results, it seems plausible to think that in each case of deciding what is the right thing to do, we should consider the available options (i.e. what actions could be performed), predict their outcomes, and approve of the action that will produce the most good. Whereas Rule utilitarians believe that we can maximise utility only by setting up a moral code that contains rules. The correct moral rules are those whose inclusion in our moral code will produce better results than other possible rules Act utilitarianism, in some cases, can allow clearly immoral actions like torturing children if it produces the greatest amount of happiness. But, in ‘Rule’ utilitarianism, an action is only good if it complies with the rules, which, if everyone followed, would lead to the greatest amount of pleasure. This immediately rules torture out as the victim will not be; highlighting ‘Rule’ utilitarianism as having a clear advantage over ‘Act’ when it comes to assessing their ability to solve moral dilemmas.
Utilitarianism’s ability to try and help resolve moral dilemmas can also be linked to the New Testament and the work of Jesus Christ, specifically the golden rule mentioned in Matthew 7:12. John Mill likened the principle of utility to Jesus’ golden rule “love your neighbour as yourself”; after all, utilitarianism insists that morality is based solely upon benevolence. Mill therefore arrives at the conclusion that one can thus best serve the happiness of others by the absolute sacrifice of his own. This is the very principle that Jesus lived by. But perhaps, the best way in which Mill’s principle of utilitarianism coincides with that of the Golden Rule is found in his idea of ‘universal benevolence’. Thus, it is safe to infer that Mill’s principle of utilitarianism manages to capture the essence of the Golden Rule to some degree
To conclude, despite the work of the modern utilitarian’s, such as Peter Singer and Karl Popper, utilitarianism is still a primitive ethical guide to moral decision making, as all versions, complicated or not, require planning the outcomes of situations, working out the effect of your actions, and other impossibilities to calculate on a frequent, daily basis. However, given time and resources, one can effectively calculate an outcome with a utilitarian based ethical theory, thus, it is somewhat a useful tool. This is due to the early work of Bentham and the hedonic calculus; the first ‘scientific’ way of calculating pleasure, which shaped the future of moral dilemma solving.

RELATED

With Reference To Masculinity And Or Femininity Discuss The View That Lifestyle Magazines Offer Their Audience A Conservative Construction Of Gender

1022 words - 5 pages audience is not completely passive and can give some resistance to the magazine. Therefore the magazine works through the hegemonic model, which recognises that the media is controlled by a relatively small group of people therefore it is their ideologies that are represented in the magazines.Through the representations that are present in these magazines they show that the representations are not conservative and are in fact the exact opposite. This is because it is a safe way of playing out the ideologies present within society and so the men do not play out their wants and desires in real life they just read about it instead.

Evaluate the view that the Nazi consolidation of power was a legal process - Modern history yr 11 KCAHS - Essay

1010 words - 5 pages Evaluate the view that the Nazi consolidation of power between January 1933 and August 1934 was a ‘legal process’. (10 Marks) The period between January 1933 and August 1943 was a key period for Hitler and the Nazi party to consolidate power in the form of a dictatorship. Hitler’s change of strategy to gain power legally was an effective process as he created a legal image in the eyes of the public. For example the appearance of legality was

Abortion Essay Moral or Immoral - St pauls college - Essay

1886 words - 8 pages , fail to accurately explain background material, and offer an unoriginal argument that simply rehashes the lectures; or o It may just be an extremely poorly written paper, with little organisation and structure and a very significant number of mechanical errors.  An "E" essay is very poor and tends to have these characteristics: o It fails to do much of anything seen in an "A-range" essay; or o It is turned in late; o It is too short; o It reads

ETHICAL DILEMMAS OF CASE STUDY - DIPLOMA IN NURSING , COLLEGE - ESSAY

5540 words - 23 pages contrary, the principle of nonmaleficence states that we should act in a way that does not inflict harm to others. Leaving Nancy and Bob to be intimate can lead to relationship breakdown which can cause depression or another negative effect on both of them. According to the moral philosopher ( Frankena, 1973), both non-maleficence and beneficence are obligations that one must try to fulfil, though at times they may conflict. As Nancy son is paying

To what extent is natural law useful in making moral decisions. - barr beacon school - essay

1509 words - 7 pages get and that makes them feel good about themselves. In terms of Aquinas’ purpose of perfection, it makes sense that if we are striving for perfection it makes sense that we would not knowingly do bad. According to Aquinas, a moral life is one that is lived according to Christian which is the same as a Christian way of life. Reason is the ability to think about something understand it then act accordingly based on human nature. This places human

Nature vs Nurture assignments that explains the nature vs nurture debate in a scientific way - union county college/ General Psychology - Essay

834 words - 4 pages that way. This explanation goes hand in hand with the nature perspective. On the other hand, others believe sexual preference is based on environmental factors. Gender differences is another huge area where this debate is challenged. Some people take the point of view that gender roles are a matter of nurture; stating that men and women aren't necessarily born to take on certain roles such as the woman being the homemaker and the man being the

Critically evaluate the claim that victims of crime precipitate their victimisation. - criminology - essay

2813 words - 12 pages ensure that the correct version of your work is uploaded through Turnitin in advance of the deadline. *ILPs will only be taken into account during marking if they specifically refer to the assessment of submitted work. Some people deliberately or recklessly put themselves at risk. Critically evaluate the claim that victims of crime precipitate their victimisation. Most criminal act comprises of an offender and a victim, the victim not necessarily

Destructive effects of the supernatural - st edmunds college - essay

1033 words - 5 pages due to a supernatural power over them, for example Dorian Gray is broken down due to the idea of Lord Henrys hypnotic speeches that guide him towards the ideas of hedonism, which is a big focus for Oscar Wilde. Oscar Wilde realised that a big part of the aristocracy was keeping their actions private, behind closed doors they took drugs and had sex, but this was not to be known by anyone else. Dorian Gray gets immersed deeply in Lord Henry’s

What Are The Main Moral Quandaries In Relation To Moral Relativism? Especially Given Increasing Globalisation, Is Moral Relativism A Suitable Solution To Moral Conflicts Between Cultures?

2101 words - 9 pages and go on to say that 'truth value relativism is the best version of relativism.'We can get no truth value from the content of an assertion until we fix the judge relative to whom it is true.Subjectivism is the extreme end of relativism. This view holds that morality is determined at the individual level, not a social or universal level. Therefore, the only moral principles that are valid are the ones you believe in, and basically all principles

outline and evaluate the behavioural approach to treating phobias - A level Psychology - essay

530 words - 3 pages Arusha Ezaz Rahman Emily Browne 6 March 2018 Outline and evaluate the behavioural approach to treating phobia A phobia is an extreme or irrational fear of or aversion to something, which according to the behavioural approach, can be caused by the social learning theory, classical conditioning or even operant conditioning. Phobias cause significant problems in a persons life and it may hamper their ability to cope with the demands of everyday

Evaluate the contribution of interview research to our understanding of friendship. - Undergraduate Psychology - Essay

1102 words - 5 pages Evaluate the contribution of interview research to our understanding of friendship. The use of interview has long been used by researchers to elicit information from questions in order to better understand a topic from that person's perspective. In relation to friendship, interviews are a very useful tool as it allows researchers to give rich detail on their thoughts and feelings in response to the question. Despite this, being based on

‘The ends always justify the means’. Do they? Discuss in contrast to utilitarianism - Open Uni - Essay

1612 words - 7 pages society of honestly and integrity in the justice system. It approves of decision we all know and deem to be wrong, therefore in my view that makes act utilitarianism a false doctrine. Further to this specific criticism, I think utilitarianism is also flawed in terms of moral administration that it would result in the breakdown of trust in society. Its rigidity in making decision based on the maximisation of utility means that people would be unable

a short introduction on the life of adeline yen mah as a child who struggled to find a way in life - class - essay

499 words - 2 pages Adeline Yen Mah is an unloved child. Having a father and stepmother who don’t love her, Adeline struggles to find a way to cope and this makes it even harder to confine in her friends about this. One day Adeline had been forgotten to be picked up from school and had to find her way home. “I realised that nobody had missed me”. “They didn’t even know I wasn’t home”. This proves that not only is she lonely but invisible to her family. In the fairytale

The Elbow Girl based on a story that can bend her elbows all the way back. - English 7th Essay - Story

794 words - 4 pages annoyed by the way his sister bent her elbows. So he punched Rachel in the face, and she wailed like a baby and ran home with her elbows still backward. “Wait, I didn’t mean to hit you!” He ran off to the house where Rachel was crying inside. When he arrived their parents were frightened. They have never seen Rachel ever do twist her elbows like that. Ryan asked, “What happened, Dad?” The Father responded, “Son, have you ever seen Rachel do this?” He

Desribe and evaluate the filter theory of attraction - A level - Essay

599 words - 3 pages Describe and evaluate the filter theory of attraction in romantic relationships (16 marks). A01; Outline Filter Theory in terms of partner choice we have a field of “availables”, which are the field of romantic partners which we could realistically form a relationship with. -But not everyone available to us is desirable. -According to K&D; three main factors that act as filters to narrow down our range of partner choice. 1. Social Demography 1st