Education always have something to do with a lot of things, like how to assign the exercise time, whether or not taking phine in the uiversity. Recently, a contradictory statements cover a lot of parents moments. The reading chosen by students or by teacher is better. The answer vary from people to people. Some asserts that the students should read what they liked book, if teacher force them to read, they will not careful apprciate it. Some people consider that reading books filnal destination is to obtain a better score, so the the teacaher's instrction will more efficient. As for as l'm concerned, l think both of choice have their reasons.
First, for some young students, who are learn at the primary school or the middle and high school, they are too young to live and decilde what they should to learn. This is because along with the develpoment of the technology, everywhere full with the temptions, such as the internet or the games. If the young students addicted to these things, they will not only waste a lot time, but also damage their eye sight. What's more, when they surf the internet, they may unconciously click some voilent information, or some web pages that have some bug may decive money and other valua information. If the teacher recommend them to read some book, these book can boost their study, and they can have postive attitude to face the life and study. Growing up in a physical and psychonological environment. What's more these conduction will reduce the school volient rat, and provide a better sourrounding for students.
Second, for most part of the university students and above all. They study a long period of time. So they have their own study style, and have their own world view. Even the teacher force them reading some book what they not interested. They will try a lot of ways to evade it. And senior students reading the book, they can read some relevent book about all areas. This is because the social need a wider develped people. They should deal with the huamn activities, and using their knowledge learniong from school to resolve the work problems. All of these obviously indicates that a succuss person should developed all fileds. therefore, a martual person should have their hobby, and their own energy to explore the world that he though suit for themselves. The university students choose their own book, can help them to reach their own goal.
Based on the reasons, l believed that each coins have tow sides, we should look at the same things in the different respect.
In terms of the little ice age are cased by the these reasons, the reading and the listening hold the different idea. The professor thinks that the reading passages ideas are out of style, the new information have present that the these three points cannot account for the ice age.
First, the reading passage suggests that the ice age may caused by the ocean currents, which from the melted glaciers. However, professor says that scientits have research that the ocean currents had only impact the Eurpean and North American. But the litele ice age had influenced the half- sphere. Therefore, the ocean currents is do not account for the little ice age.
Second, the reading passage asserts that due to the volcanic eruption, the gas emitted in the atmosphere block the sunlight, which makes the earth cool. However, the professor indicates that it is true that the volcanic eruption emergy enough sulfer gas into the atmosphere. But the volcanic eruption also emits other substantials, which can largely absorb the sunlight, and enableing the earth warm. Why people do not know this things, because at that time people had not already found these things. Even people found it, when volcanic eruption, these things was not be reported. So a number of people thinks this ways will useful to cool down the earth.
Finally, even the reading passage suggest that in the past, the population is lowbefor the little ice age, so the amount of forest will absorb a lot of carbon dioxide, which makes the earth cool. However, the professor hold the different point that the forest actually can stop the global warming, by reducing the concetration of the carbon dioxide. The problems is that these forest not have enough time to cool the temperatures. What's more the human population increasing very quikly, and they must cut a lot of new forests to live and feed themselves.
