Mrs. Janice Truitt
The Mercator and the Peter’s Projection Map are so different for multiple reasons. For decades there has been an abundant of research, tests and hypothesis that have been made to try and figure out why the two are so different and which is the most accurate form of the earth. When regarding to the Mercator map, it is represented as a flat surface. When looking at the globe it is spherical, however, once you take a look at the Mercator Map it is not spherical but is cylindrical. Why did this happen? When looking at the globe you notice that there aren’t any straight lines connecting to any two places. To relive the difficulties of trying to navigate from place to place, the Mercator Map formed a cylindrical view point opening the ends at the poles and with imaginary lines that cuts all meridians at the same angle, forming straight lines making it easier to navigate from location to location. As this may bring many advantages, this projection distorts the size and shape of approaching countries, continents and oceans. As this projection was originally used for navigation, it was inappropriately used in addition as a world map. As a result of this, the size and shape of different areas are much bigger and smaller than they actually are. When regarding to the Peter’s Map, all of the sizes of countries, continents and oceans are correct. With the Peter’s Map, it is an accurate representation of how big or small areas are and how far away they are from each other regardless of how it may appear on the map. All lines are either horizontal or vertical with precise directional relationships to all positions on the map. Although the map does use a rectangular coordinate system, the parallel lines of longitude and latitude are accurately shown....