Philosophy Human Realtionship With Computers Technology - San Mateo Community College Philosophy - Can Computers Think

1318 words - 6 pages

Wu 1
Alex Wu, Juan
Philosophy 100
Prof. Anton
Computers, a technological advancement that were once only available to the
military and business firms, eventually became a big role player for everyday life for the
common man. Without computers, there would be no social media, no video games
(consoles are technically computers too), no online shopping , etc. Ever since the 70’s,
the computers have improved in a number of ways over the years: a decrease in overall
size, faster performance via the processors, higher resolution graphics, and other unique
features such as Cortana from windows 10 which is an intelligent personal assistant for
the computer. They have come quite a long way from solving basic math to the more
complex tasks such as programming.
As computers become more and more efficient and advanced, they will eventually
take over most of the jobs that were initially meant for humans. This somewhat implies
that computers will eventually be smarter than us. But can computers truly think? The
answer really depends on perspective, and by that I mean what thinking truly is according
to the audience.
The mechanist view argues that computers are just as smart as us humans and
therefore is a possible cause for people to lose their jobs to computers someday. It is
blatantly obvious that computers are much more efficient at completing tasks given to
them, but saying that they think are questionable. People will argue that thinking requires
much more complicated characteristics than computers are capable of having. There are
limits and conditions that a computer must meet in order to complete a task. Without
Wu 2
these specific information given by humans on how to complete said task, a computer is
deemed as nothing. Computers simply do not have these problem solving skills that are in
the same level as the human brain, which eventually adapts to the given situation. If a
computer does not contain the information required for the subject, it simply cannot
obtain what it needs on its own. It is just not capable of doing so.
Recently scientists developed an artificial intelligence that has beaten the
European champion in a board game called Go. Having a checker like board with black
and white stones, the possibilities of making a move are more than that of chess. The A.I.
has data inside of all the different scenarios in recorded history and was programmed to
make the most optimal move based on those given scenarios. However, without that data
given by a human, it would have been impossible for it to make a move let alone a good
one. Computers requires the input of a user and without it, it is useless. This argument
goes to show that computers are not capable of thinking.
As for the argument that computers can think, let us say that I have given you a
simple math equation. By nature we are to spit out an answer, but before we give the
answer, we had to think for the answer. Even the simplest of equations one must think
before they give the answer because the question is processed through the brain and
returns something. This phenomenon is further supported by John Searle, who thought of
the concept known as the Chinese Room. ​The concept behind the Chinese room
experiment is that a man that has absolutely no knowledge of the Chinese language is put
into a room with no windows except for a tiny slot and is given cheat sheets on how to
interpret the unknown calligraphy he is given and how to respond. Searle thinks that the
man would most likely pass as a fluent speaker because of the responses he made from
the cheat sheet. He then relates this back to the computers saying that no matter how
advanced these programs are at “thinking” like humans, they do not understand the
meaning behind the conversation. Searle only sees it as that the computers can only give
Wu 3
set outputs for set inputs.
Furthermore on the topic that computers can "think" like humans, it by no means
can feel human emotion nor be able to have the ability to experience human sensations
such as love. I have yet to believe that our technology world has yet to produce such an
advancement. Here I am arguing that the way machines "think" is similar to that of a
human but to an extent. Computers were designed to that of a human brain. They both
contain memories and are exclusive in their own way; in this case a computer has
different programs and languages within itself. Computers are efficient at using data
given to them to solve problems, but humans can do that also. We can retrieve and
store certain memories (some people naturally have photographic memory) in which
we solve problems with or to just process our daily lives.
In addition, everyone takes a part in determining each other’s personality via
influencing each other throughout our lives in a positive and/or negative way. Keep in
mind that the way the brain and computer works. We learn through experience that we
have gained over the years. Computers are in a way similar, they process information that
it has gained over a certain period to customize itself to the point that it deems itself more
to the user’s preferences. A prime example would be how websites like Ebay keep in
record of what the users look at and advertises said items throughout various other
websites that the user enters.
John Searle would probably argue with these statements because he thinks that
computers are no more than machines that only simply give an output for every input.
But when we think about it, the human brain is no different from that. We have our own
“programmed” reactions to a certain scenarios. An example would be going back to our
first week of philosophy class, when we address the question “what is the meaning of
life?” and interpreting it as “how ought should one live?”. According to Charles Darwin,
all living being should aim at survival, and via our instincts we react whenever our lives
are in jeopardy. Although a computer may not possess natural instincts like humans and
Wu 4
animals, they are still capable of having reactions to certain phenomena once it has been
programmed by a human.
The argument of whether or not that a if a computer is capable of thinking or not
may be one of the more bigger debates because the answer varies to the point in which
the answer can go either way. It is simply a matter of perspective. A computer may not be
able to think because it depends on the input of the user in order for it to give a resoponse
of any kind. A computer may also be able to think because thinking is a matter of
processing information and/or using that information to give a certain response, in which
a computer has the capability of doing so. It is a matter of what the individual defines
what “thinking” truly is and the characteristics that fit in the criteria of thinking. In my
personal perspective, I sincerely believe that the computer has advanced enough
throughout time to the point that their "thinking" process is similar to that of humans.
The certain characteristics that computers carry with them during their thinking process is
what makes them "think" in the ways similar to how humans think. We humans have
certainly come a long way of putting together some circuit boards, microchips, and a few
pieces of scrap metal to form an end result so unique and complex that it can perform
similarly to that of a human brain. The extent of their capabilities and their untapped
potential in the near future is still yet to be known and that the possibilities are endless.
The sky is truly the limit.

More like Philosophy Human Realtionship With Computers Technology - San Mateo Community College Philosophy - Can Computers Think

Can Computers Think? The Case For And Against Artificial Intelligence

1238 words - 5 pages ... Artificial intelligence has been the subject of many bad '80'smovies and countless science fiction novels. But what happens when weseriously consider the question of computers that think. Is it possible forcomputers to have complex thoughts, and even emotions, like homo sapien? Thispaper will seek to answer that question and also look at what attempts are beingmade to make artificial intelligence (hereafter called AI) a reality.Before we can ...

Can Computers Understand? Includes John Searle's Arguments

452 words - 2 pages ... syllogistic sumary of computer's abilities well done.Can Computers understand?1) Thinking is the hallmark of understanding.2) Only special machines can think.3) If something can think it can understand.4) Only special machines that can think can understand.5) "Mental" states and their resulting actions are products of the center of activity (brain).6) To understand, thoughts must be produced by the brain.7) A computer's mental states and events ...

Philosophy Essay So I Can Get Access To This Website - Philosophy - Essay

738 words - 3 pages ... with the concept of vaccination. This is just progress of medical science and it is fair to say that people no longer live natural lives even now. Another argument would be that it would lead to people running out of economic resources such as living space, food, water etc. Yet with technology into reusable energy, vertical farming and the fact that since people can live longer and more comfortable lives, they could therefore work for longer ...

What Is Socrates’ Argument That No Harm Can Come To A Good Man - Thompson River University PHIL-1110 - Philosophy Paper

1524 words - 7 pages ... [Type here] 4 Question: What is Socrates’ argument that no harm can come to a good man?” Do you agree? “Yet the deeply exciting thing about human beings is that when the individual is free he chooses as the good life the process of becoming.” ~ Carl Rogers Socrates, according to his own logic, dispels the fear of death and harm as basis for his argument that, “I am certain that nothing can harm a good man either in life or after death” (pg. 9 ...

Theory Of Knowledge With Phrenology - Philosophy - Essay

1234 words - 5 pages Free ... verifiable evidence is the “right way” to form a belief in Clifford’s eyes. However, can evidence be trusted? And if so, can it always be a guide to what’s moral or immoral? While science seems to be the perfect manifestation of Clifford’s belief ideology, science has proven to have its fallacies. Some forms of scientific theories that were once approved by the scientific community and accepted by society have now not only been disproved, but put ...

Interview With Social Sciences Instructor - Erie Community College/ Human Services II - Assignment

791 words - 4 pages ... to anyone registered in ECC. I, also, offer guidance to anyone who needs help navigating the Human Services Program. Any student with any questions or concerns can come visit me at my office during my availability hours. Q: What are some challenges the population you serve face? A: Well, most of my “clients” are the students here at ECC. Since, they are in college, I would say that most struggle with their financial situations and that they over ...

Paper #2 Philosophy Of The Human Person - St. Johns University - Philosophy

1157 words - 5 pages ... the grounds that with more power individuals can have a simpler time getting the things they want while likewise remaining more remote far from the things they have repugnances for. As Hobbes recognizes that disregarding us and acting to our greatest advantage without the respect for others would accentuate his record of human instinct as well as creature nature too. Delivering what Hobbes thinks the most exceedingly awful-case situation is the ...

Lack Of Communication Due To Technology - San Jacinto College - Essay

2158 words - 9 pages ... Saber 1 Saber 5 Mostafa Saber Professor Casey Zander ENGL 1302-7F5 24 April 2016 Lack of Communication Due to Technology Communication is one of the most fundamental aspects of human life. You can imagine how life would be without communication. Technology, on the other hand, is the solution to human problems, in the sense that technology makes work easier (Bargh, John, and Katelyn, 2004). Simply, it means that both of these aspects are vital ...

Socrates On The Soul And Human Happiness - Emory - Philosophy 400 - Essay

4129 words - 17 pages ... mention ad hominem in his support. The first is evident when he says to Socrates, “Don’t you think you’ve been refuted already, Socrates, when you’re saying things the likes of which no human being would maintain? Just ask any one of these people” (Gorgias 817). How he can also say after this, “You really do think it’s the way I say it is” (Gorgias 815), is unintelligible, but should not come as a surprise given Polus’ stubborn, impulsive nature. In ...

Why Should You Be Concerned With Being A Good Person - Intro To Philosophy - Essay

767 words - 4 pages ... Khadijah Fisher “Why should you be concerned with being a good person?” According to Webster, the term good, when used as an adjective means to be desired or approved of; when used as a noun it means to either be morally right/ righteous or to be a benefit or advantage to someone or something. So, as you can see the term “good” is very subjective. It’s almost like a social contract. As a child, I was often told to be good whenever my parents ...

Anthropology Research Human Trafficking - Pikes Peak Community College - Research Paper

1146 words - 5 pages ... puts them in competition with other gangs. Human trafficking is a crime that keeps increasing drastically and is legal in some countries, that’s why it is crucial that one knows how many people would be saved if everyone unites to stop people from living that type of lifestyle. 4 These different factors can affect people across the globe. It was estimated by The United Nations Office On Drugs and Crime (UNODC) that approximately 800,000 people ...

For As Long As We Can Remember America Has Always Been Closely Associated With Racism - South San Antonio High School/ Goverment 1301 - Essay

2001 words - 9 pages ... faced those of different races. Racism has existed in our society for as long as we can remember. It is a highly controversial topic that nearly holds everybody’s attention. Racism is a common form of oppression against a human being, its origins began with the discrimination of a group of people, typically aimed towards their believed to be inferior genetics. If their biology differed from their oppressors even in the slightest, they would ...

Psychology Of Ancient Philosophers And A Hole In Aristotle's Argument On Psychology - Randolph-macon College Philosophy - Essay

2157 words - 9 pages Free ... brain dead comatose patient no longer partakes in the animal aspect of soul nor the human aspect. Thus, the body can only survive with help of machines as the higher function needed for survival is no longer working. In other words, the soul no longer exists and the body is out of balance, leading to the ultimate death of the patient once the patient is taken off of the life sustaining technology. This scenario still follows Aristotle’s ...

Student Success Exploration Paper. In This Essay It Describes My Transition From A 2yr Community College To A Major University, All Step By Step Explanation With Facts

1888 words - 8 pages ... expanding the frontiers of science and technology. Furthering your college education in an institute of higher learning may set you aside from your colleagues at Valencia. The college that I plan to attend after I obtain my AA degree at Valencia is the University Of Central Florida (UCF). Furthering my education is important and essential to my personal as well as life-long career goals. If you think the price of education is expensive, try the price ...

“how Getting High Made Me A Better Caretaker” - City College/prof Crull - Philosophy Paper

1237 words - 5 pages ... caretaker for his wife as well. He proceeds by explaining the gratitudes of smoking marijuana throughout the article to convince the reader that smoking marijuana can make an individual feel “enriched and enlivened”. I agree with Huth’s argument and believe that marijuana can benefit people with easier and happier lifestyles. Huth begins by explaining how marijuana has benefitted him. He continues and mentioning that he has been a longtime smoker and ...