Political Science Essay

1415 words - 6 pages

We have many different types of people in the United States. There are no two people that are alike. Every single person has different opinions and has different beliefs. People have different opinions of many various ideas. Two people might have dissimilar opinions, even though they might agree on other opinions. Beliefs are just like opinions, different people believe in different things. We the people of the United States have certain names we give people for their opinions and their beliefs politically. The politicians see people as conservatives and liberals. The conservatives and liberals are used in characterizing the political attitudes of an average American. According to James Q. Wilson, author of American Government, "liberals and conservatives are a way in explaining or justifying their preferences for candidates or policies" (Wilson, page 73). I will be describing what "Liberals" and "Conservatives" mean in the United States today, and to what extent these terms are useful in characterizing the political attitudes of the average American.One of the two different types of people we have in the United States government in a political standpoint is Liberals. Liberals are people who favor a more active federal government for regulating business, supporting social welfare, and protecting minority rights, but who prefer less regulation on private social conduct (Bryant, page 2). In other words liberals are people who are in favor of the government getting involved in their actions. We have different types of liberals in the United States. There are not a lot of people who are liberal or conservative on all the issues. There are people who have liberal beliefs on a certain issue, but they have conservative beliefs on another issue "Though the average citizen cannot be described as being purely liberal or purely conservative, bear in mind that political activists often do display a great deal of attitude consistency. In other words, if they are liberal on one set of issues, they are likely to be liberal on all others" (Wilson, page 75). One type of liberal is Pure Liberals. Pure Liberals are people who are liberal on both economical and social issues (Bryant, page 2). Some liberals might be liberal on just economical issues or social issues, but pure liberals are liberal on both issues. Pure Liberals want the government to reduce economic inequality, regulate business, tax the rich heavily, deal with crime by addressing its economic causes, protect the rights of accused criminals, allow abortion on demand, and guarantee the broadest possible freedoms of speech and press (Bryant, page 4).Another group of people whom we have in the United States are the Conservatives. Conservatives are people who favor more limited and local government, less government regulations of markets, more social conformity to traditional norms and values, and tougher policies toward criminals (Lakoff, page 23). In other words conservatives are people who want the government not to get involved in their affairs. Just like we have Pure Liberals, we have the same with Conservatives. We have different types of Conservatives and one type is Pure Conservatives. Pure Conservatives are conservatives on both economic and social issues. They want less government regulation of businesses, lower taxes and a greater reliance on markets, and they advocate getting tough on criminals, punishing pornographers and cutting back on welfare payments (Bryant, page 6). .Basically, liberal people support the government on many different issues, while conservative people do not support the government or the actions that the government performs. Conservatives would like the government to be changed around and get tougher to discuss certain issues that are very controversial, like punishing criminals, pornographers or other similar things.Liberals and Conservatives play a major role in the characterization of the political attitudes of the average American. Almost every American wants to be part of a major party; they want to be defined as a liberal or a conservative. When a person says that they are Liberal, it describes their beliefs and the kind of standards that person has. For example, when a person says they are liberal we think that the certain individual is probably in a professional occupation, lives in a big city, and has a postgraduate education. The same goes for a person who is a Conservative. When we find out that a person is a Conservative we get certain ideas of that persons beliefs and opinions on certain issues. Pure conservatives are more likely to come from small towns, to live in the Midwest or South, and be involved in business.Being Liberal or Conservative person, we get a sense of how that person will vote in upcoming elections. Liberals have different voting strategies then do Conservatives, but it also depends on the people who are running. Depending on what the people who are running for office say they are going to do. Liberals and conservatives see which side they belong to and then they make their decisions.One of the controversial subjects argued by liberals and conservatives is the issue of abortion. For years people have argued back and forth whether abortion is legal and ethical thing to do. It has been questioned whether or not killing a fetus inside the mother's wound is the same as killing a child that has been born.People who call themselves liberals are the supporters of abortion while those who are opposed to abortion are called conservative. Conservatives argue that no liberal is a good liberal unless she or he supports the "woman's right to choose." The question that people ask themselves is the following: Are the unborn really human? There are two possibilities: Either the fetus developing in the womb is a human being, or it is a blob of protoplasm. There can be no in-between. There can be no half-humans. If pro-choice advocates can prove that a fetus at any stage of development is not human, then their position becomes the correct one. But if they cannot furnish such proof, then the pro-life position becomes correct one.The platform of the Democratic Party introduced a pro-abortion plank that was clearly anti-life which is considered anti-Catholic. The protection of pre-born human life, the most vulnerable of all human life, was discarded in favor of a woman's right to do whatever she wants with the developing human life within her because it is in her body. Instead of promoting a liberal cause in support of birth mothers and their babies, the Democratic Party embraced an elitist cause by promoting the destruction of pre-born and partially born human life. Catholic Democrats, therefore, have an obligation in conscience to do everything they can to reverse the pro-abortion policy of their party and to support those candidates who will protect human life in the womb. Catholic Republicans, on the other hand, have the obligation in conscience to see that their party plank against abortion is acted upon rather than ignored in legislative processes across the nation.Liberals and Conservatives go a long way in the United States. We judge a person whether that person is a Liberal or a Conservative on their actions and beliefs. When we know that a person is Liberal or Conservative, we know how that person stands on certain issues and what that person's beliefs are. Liberals and Conservatives also gofurther then just people knowing what their beliefs and opinions are. Liberals and Conservatives makes a big difference on the way America votes its candidates into office. So being Liberal or Conservative has a great impact on not only the lives of everyday people, but also on the lives of the people who are in office.Having different types of people in the United States means that we will be having many different ideas, beliefs and opinions. With so many different people and so many different ideas, beliefs and opinions, we have a way of telling people apart politically. Liberals and Conservatives are the different names given to people according to their political belief. I have discussed what Liberals and Conservatives mean in the United States and to what extent these terms are useful in characterizing the political attitudes of the average American.

RELATED

Political Science: Government System - Political Science 100 - Essay

595 words - 3 pages 1 Jerry Tran Political Science 100/ 2-3:15 Prof. Steiner 6 October 2015 Book Report #1 With Bill Clinton and Coelho chatting, this signify in terms of power by having a connection to a super elite gives you the opportunity to communicate and talk with them. It basically focuses on the idea of interaction among the elites. As for Coelho, he saw it as an opportunity to act like normal friends to Bill Clinton, of if all the elites are talking about

Is Political Science Research Relevant?

3071 words - 13 pages Political Science research has clearly been relevant and instrumental in understanding the interactions of humans and the world at large. Through analysis and normative change, it has contributed significantly to areas such as political behaviour, comparative politics and international relations. In using qualitative and quantitative tools, political science has increased its relevance through institutions and policies that create change and

Intro to Political Science Final - Xavier University of Louisiana - Final Paper

2406 words - 10 pages Running head: THE SECOND AMENDMENT 1 2 THE SECOND AMENDMENT The Second Amendment Bikhari M. Reyes PSCI 1010 Intro to Political Science Xavier University of Louisiana Dr. Russell Frazier April 29, 2019 The Second Amendment American citizens love their constitutional freedoms and tend to utilize them on a daily basis. The freedom of speech, the freedom to peacefully assemble, and the freedom of the press are used on a nearly daily basis by all

United States Political Science Paper - Lamar University Political Science - Essay

1554 words - 7 pages Free are supposed to be independent at all times and ensure that they are never subject to political pressures as this would ruin their reputation terribly (Pacelle, 72). Additionally, from a critical analysis of the Texas Judicial Branch, one realizes that the contemporary courts are divided by placing them in their categories of geographic coverage, origin, and jurisdiction. The original jurisdictions are normally meant to hear cases that are

political science summary of chapter - political science - reaction paper

689 words - 3 pages . President Reagan (1981-1989), coined the movement ’New Federalism’ an attempt to Return power to the states. Today, the issue of proper balance between national and state powers, is as viable as It was in 1789. States rights have remained a controversial topic for more than 200 years. Americans are divided about which laws should be federal and which should be reserved To the states. Elazar claimed there are 2 layers of political culture in the

political science on a political party - azusa pacific - essay

528 words - 3 pages Serena Gutierrez 8:10 Political Parties: Democratic Party The Democratic Party is one of the two major contemporary political parties in the United States, along with the Republican Party. It goes all the way back to its heritage to Thomas Jefferson and James Madison's Democratic-Republican Party, the modern-day Democratic Party was founded around 1828 by supporters of Andrew Jackson, making it the world's oldest active political party

Political Science review questions - University of Michigan Political Science 101 - Homework

2448 words - 10 pages Chapter 8 Which of the following came under heavy criticism following the attack in Benghazi? Secretary Hilary Clinton, President Obama, and Representative John Boehner The role of a bureaucracy is to turn political choices into policy realities. True The colonial experience with the king’s governors and other royal officials had which of the following effects on the members of Congress? They became wary of delegating too much authority to the

Essay on Orientalism, Power & Knowledge - University - Political Science - Essay

2140 words - 9 pages Knowledge Bank as an example. Finally, this paper will critique the narrative of modernity inherent to discourses of development and evident in the World Bank’s privileging of Western education Orientalism, defined as a “political vision of reality whose structure promoted the difference between the familiar (…the West, ‘us’) and the strange (the Orient… ‘them’)”, (Said, 1978: 44) is deeply implicated in contemporary discourses of development (Kothari

Civil Rights and Civil Liberties - Political Science - Essay Questions

1498 words - 6 pages equality to all minority groups, whereas violation of Civil Liberties is violation of rights on government level and focus more on individuals. For example, it is a violation of Civil Rights, if someone is denied of government service because he/she is black/gay. But, it’s a violation of Civil Liberties if he/she simply denied of government service for no reason. 2. Briefly explain the major political movements/events undertaken that helped

Democratization of South Africa - Political Science - Research paper

3188 words - 13 pages the confidence of the assembly in order remain in office. South Africans also elect provincial legislatures which govern each of the country’s nine provinces. Since the end of apartheid in 1994 the ANC has dominated South Africa’s politics. The main opponent to the ANC’s rule is the Democratic Alliance, led by Mmusi Maimane. Other major political parties represented in Parliament include the Economic Freedom fighters and the Inkatha Freedom party

Civil Liberties in the United States - Political Science - Essay

985 words - 4 pages Sierra Sanchez Professor K Poly 1 June 7 2018 Civil Liberties From the beginning, the United States Constitution has guaranteed the American people civil liberties. These liberties have given citizens’ rights to speak, believe, and act freely. The Constitution grants citizens the courage to express their mind about something they believe is immoral or unjust. Through civil liberties we are able see evidence of structural and procedural balance of

Political participation in UK and Germany - political science, democracy and dictatorship - essay

619 words - 3 pages World Politics UK Change in UK political party membership has not been uniform either between parties or over time. In the 19th century, Parties in the UK were divided by how much power parliament thought they should have. Later in the 19th century,  the two main parties (Conservatives and Liberals), built more parties to appeal to more male voters (Orvis and Drogus 2018, 321). The Labour party party was founded in the 1900’s. “By the 1920’s

write about how political parties lead to polarization in the U.S - American politics- Political Science - Essay

1989 words - 8 pages Political parties and polarization It is hard to imagine the United States without its two major parties, the Democratic Party, and the Republican Party. For most of us, our affiliation with one of the parties has become an essential part of our identity. A new survey from the Pew Research Center has found that ​Almost 2 in 3 Democrats (64%) and more than half of Republicans (55%) say they have "just a few" or "none" close friends from the

PS 153 Memo Essay in Regards to Tax Reform - UCSB/ Political Science 153 - Essay

1025 words - 5 pages rural areas · Mechanisms? · Increase participation—Votes · Jobs · Infrastructure · Economic control 2nd Face: How do I get the issue into the agenda? Individuals must consider the bill valuable by justifying bias of the current political system · Mobilization of bias · Mechanisms? · Threat of sanctions · Unemployment · Net security · Force · Unfavorable social services 3rd face: How do I reverse the assumptions held towards the 1%? Tax reform is

What is the meaning of the Electoral College - City College/Political Science - Essay

1616 words - 7 pages . And the electoral college was designed to represent each state’s choice for the presidency. To abolish or change the electoral college in favor of a popular election for president would strike at the very heart of the federal structure laid out in our constitution. Some argue that state viewpoints are more important than political minority viewpoints. And the opinion of the individual state populations is more important than the opinions of the