Psychology Of Ancient Philosophers And A Hole In Aristotle's Argument On Psychology - Randolph-macon College Philosophy - Essay

2157 words - 9 pages

Psychology of Ancient Philosophers from Parmenides to Aristotle and a
Hole in Aristotle’s Argument on Psychology Regarding Hypothetical Comatose Patients
For thousands of years, philosophers have debated the relation between body and soul. The ancient philosophers built upon one another’s ideas, expressing multiple ideologies that still hold relevance in the debate on philosophical psychology to this day. The following essay will examine the psychology expressed by Parmenides and his atomists successors, Plato and Socrates, and Aristotle, observing that each provides a correction to a perceived imbalance in their conceptions of their predecessors regarding the relationship between body and soul. It will argue that Aristotle’s resolution is best, but introduce a hypothetical case of patients in comatose states with and without brain activity to illustrate the limits of Aristotle’s conception.
Parmenides, a monist, is one of the earliest philosophers of which one can study that produced a clear psychology regarding the topic of body and soul. As a monist, Parmenides believed there to be a singular, unbreakable, and everlasting being of pure existence that encompassed all. Being would repudiate the idea of empty space or void because if Being encompasses all, there can be no such thing as nonbeing. Due to this lack of void, there would be no room for motion and change to occur in the universe, ultimately suggesting that the physical world must be illusionary as it represents change and motion in every aspect of it’s physical existence.
Thus, if the physical realm is illusionary, the physical body must be as well, but what of the soul? To Parmenides, souls would be Being. In other words, soul would be an infinite and eternal substance that coincides with the rest of Being. Thus, Parmenides believed the soul to be the same as Being and significantly more important than the illusory physical world and body.
The next set of Philosophers found the idea of discounting change and motion in the physical world unsatisfactory and instead, adapted Parmenides’s theory to better fit the physical world in which they lived. By doing so, the psychology regarding the relation between soul and body changed drastically. These philosophers were the atomists.
The atomists theorized that singular, unbreakable, and everlasting particles called atoms moved around in a void, joining together and breaking apart to create the physical world one experiences. According to the atomist theory, atoms were different sizes and shapes which held different characteristics that worked together to create the different sensations that mankind experiences. Democritus, one of the atomists of this time explained that although the atoms allowed beings to experience the different sensations of the world, the sensations were unreliable as the sensory qualities were purely due to convention. To Democritus, the only realities in the world were the atoms and void as can be seen with the following quote, “By convention, sweet; by convention, bitter; by convention, hot; by convention, cold; by convention, color; but in reality, atoms and void,” (Cohen et al. 58).
With this ideology, one can conclude that the atomists believed that although the physical world holds great importance, the body was an unreliable tool to use when searching for the truth. This leaves the question of the part the soul plays in atomist theology. To the atomists, the soul was a product of the body created when the atoms formed together to make the body. Thus, the soul is a finite product that dies with the body when the atoms break apart once more. In a hierarchical sense, for simplicities sake, atoms and void would hold the top position, then the body – which is a product of atoms moving in the void, and then the soul – which is a product of the body.
The atomist theory that the soul held less importance than the body did not cohere with the ideologies of later philosophers. Socrates and Plato were some of these philosophers. It is important to remember that Plato wrote using Socrates as a character and his psychology would mix with the supposed psychology of Socrates. So, for the purpose of this essay, we will be viewing the following as Plato’s psychology with Socrates being used as a tool to represent Plato’s ideas.
Plato theorized that there was another realm in which Forms existed. Forms are nonphysical ideas that represent different facets of the world. Every aspect of the physical world has a perfect representation in the realm of the Forms. This includes color, types of animals, and even the concept of the soul. The Forms in this other realm are perfect representations whilst what one would view in the physical realm are imperfect shadows of the Forms. For example, one can claim that they know what ‘largeness’ is but can never truly show a representation of this idea as there is no perfect example in the physical world. In the realm of the forms, the concept of ‘largeness’ does not need to be proven - as the idea, in of itself, is a perfect representation.
Plato then adds in another aspect of the realm of the forms that eventually leads to his psychology. In the realm of the Forms, the ideas of largeness and smallness, although separate, work together when transposed to the physical world. To Plato, everything must come from something else. This something else would be a subjects’ opposite. In other words, one can not have night without day, happiness without sadness, or life without death. It is this idea of being unable to have life without death that allows one to begin to understand Plato’s view of the soul.
If death comes from life and life comes from death then the human soul has no end and is instead in a continuous loop between the realm of the Forms and the physical realm. Thus, the soul is eternal even if the body were to die. Through the death of the body, the soul is able to join back with the realm of the Forms which contains ultimate truth. In Meno, Socrates as written by Plato suggests that death is the ultimate freedom for a philosopher as they are finally able to live among perfect truth as opposed to the shadow of truth that is provided in the physical word.
Plato writes, “A soul in this state,” – a pure state with no association to the body in life – “makes its way to the invisible, which is like itself, the divine and immortal and wise, and arriving there it can be happy, having rid itself of confusion, ignorance, fear, violent desires, and the other human ills and, as is said of the initiates, truly spend the rest of time with the gods” (Cohen et al. 181).
This puts the soul above the body in Plato’s ideology as it is eternal and is gifted with the opportunity to survive among the ultimate Truth in the other realm. Aristotle, a later philosopher disagrees with this concept, however.
Aristotle was a student of Plato but disagreed with the theory of Forms which shaped Plato’s Psychology. Unlike Plato, Aristotle was a materialist and looked to the physical world for explanations on questions relating to life after death. Whilst Plato believed in a separate realm in which the forms manifest, Aristotle felt that the forms were only manifest in the physical world, denying the notion of another realm entirely. Thus, the only Truth to search for exists in the physical realm of which one can experience and interact with. Due to this, Aristotle believed that the soul and body were tied together. One could not live without the other and both played an equal role in contributing to life.
Aristotle did not stop at this point, however. He continues to describe the soul and breaks it down into three parts. That of a plant, an animal, and a human.
A plant soul only searched for what is necessary to survive, that is nutrients. An animal soul, whilst also fulfilling the need for life also required a perceptual aspect of existence. That is, hunger and sexual desires. Aristotle clearly states such in the text De Anima, “To plants only the nutritive part belongs, whereas to others, it belongs together with the perceptual part” (Cohen et al. 517). The human soul has an added aspect, that is higher intellectual and rational thought.
It is important to note that as we progress through the three sections of soul, the previous section does not disappear, instead it is added to. To explain, animal souls do not cease in the need for nutrition, they only gain a need for perceptual aspects such as hunger and sex. Humans have all three, the soul of a plant which promotes nutrition, the soul of an animal which promotes perceptual desires, and the soul of a human which promotes an intellectual desire.
In the following diagram, the triangle represents the pant soul, the circle represents the animal soul, and the rectangle represents the human soul. As shown, each progressive section holds the previous section inside.
To Aristotle, a being could not truly flourish without the level of soul it was meant to have. In other words, a bear could not flourish without the animal soul as it would not have the desires necessary for survival or happiness. It would no longer feel the need to eat as it would feel no hunger, which would ultimately cause the animal to starve. For a human, higher brain function is necessary to survive in the group and thrive in society.
This leads to the question, what would occur if one were to take away one or multiple levels of a soul. It is only recently that this question has arisen as current technology has allowed mankind to keep the body from dying, even in extenuating circumstances. Take comatose patients, for example, Today, we are able to keep the body alive regardless of brain activity – something that Aristotle was not exposed to in his era. Due to these advances, parts of Aristotle’s Psychology can now be called into question. Does taking away certain aspects of the soul – plant, animal or human – take away from the humanity of a person? At what point is a comatose patient no longer living according to Aristotle’s psychology? To truly delve into these questions, we will examine two hypothetical cases of comatose patients who are being kept alive with medical intervention.
First, we will examine the hypothetical case of a patient with no brain activity that is being kept alive by medical technology. A brain dead comatose patient no longer partakes in the animal aspect of soul nor the human aspect. Thus, the body can only survive with help of machines as the higher function needed for survival is no longer working. In other words, the soul no longer exists and the body is out of balance, leading to the ultimate death of the patient once the patient is taken off of the life sustaining technology. This scenario still follows Aristotle’s psychology as this patient would not be capable of any type of life promoting actions by way of perceptual or intellectual action.
A comatose patient with brain activity, however, is another story. The medical intervention is fulfilling the plant soul desire for nourishment. However, this patient has a human soul that is still intact but an inactive animal soul. That is, the patient can no longer fulfill the perceptual aspect needed to flourish. The patient does have higher brain capability and can hear and understand what those around are saying, even if the patient can not respond. The patient has the potential to come out of the comatose state and continue living life as well. Aristotle, in this case, would be at a loss. Although the patient is partaking in the human soul which is necessary for human survival, the patient’s soul is not complete in the sense that it can not fully interact with the outside people. Ultimately, the person is alive but in a sleeping state. They have the potential to thrive but are currently at rest. This puts the person in a limbo state for an indefinite amount of time. Thus, the patient is both living in a philosopher’s ideal state but not flourishing in the way that allows a philosopher to grow their intellect.
Ultimately, this scenario is a hole in Aristotle’s Psychology that does not present an answer at the current time. Building upon each of the previous philosophers, Aristotle proved to have the most well thought out theory but it does not seem to hold against the hypothetical scenario above. Thus, no philosopher can be proven right or wrong in their psychology as each has a hole in which it can be torn down.
Works Cited
Cohen, S. Marc., et al. Readings in Ancient Greek Philosophy: from Thales to Aristotle. 5th ed., Hackett, 2016.
Kenny, Anthony. Ancient Philosophy (A New History of Western Philosophy ; v. 1). Vol. 1, Oxford University Press, 2004.

More like Psychology Of Ancient Philosophers And A Hole In Aristotle's Argument On Psychology - Randolph-macon College Philosophy - Essay

Our Response To Mental Illness: Analysis - Philosophy Of Psychology - Essay

1677 words - 7 pages ... , and more importantly, if the goals, actions and reasonings can be justified on ethical grounds. In this essay I will be exploring mental health through an ethical lens, in order to highlight significant issues that stem from the influence that the current models for the classifications, diagnosis and treatments of mental illnesses and psychiatric disorders have on how patients are perceived and addressed on a societal, institutional, and ...

Discuss Idiographic And Nomethetic Approach In Psychology - Psychology - Essay

1011 words - 5 pages ... to predict and control any likely future behaviour. The approach is associated with methods that would be regarded as scientific within psychology such as experiments, which would include large numbers of participants in order to establish ways in which people are similar or different. The humanistic approach in psychology is a key example of the idiographic perspective. Rogers and Maslow, took a phenomalogical and subjective approach in the study ...

Stress In College Athletes And Non-athletes - Psychology - APA Style Essay

1327 words - 6 pages Free ... 1 Running head: Stress in College Athletes and Non-Athletes 3 Stress in College Athletes and Non-Athletes Stress in College Athletes and Non-Athletes Lakisha Camacho PSYC104v01 or v02: Introduction to Psychology II Dr. Pipitone College of Mount Saint Vincent February 24, 2019 Our group decided to focus on the stress of college student-athletes and non-athletes. Stress can be defined as emotional levels that affect an individual's mind ...

Psychological Effects Of Wrongful Indictments In Molly's Game - College Psychology - Essay

1102 words - 5 pages ... Psychological Effects of Wrongful Indictments Molly’s Game Molly’s Game is the fascinating and true book to movie adaptation of Molly Bloom, former professional freestyle skier and poker game runner.  In her youth, her father, a profession phycologist himself, pushed her and her two older brothers to achieve incredibly high academic and athletic goals.  While Molly was only ever number three in North American women’s freestyle before she ...

Psychology And Sociology - Essay

3760 words - 16 pages ... concepts are similar from each others. In the early twentieth century, psychologists began to develop psychodynamic theories as a new approach to therapy that focuses on resolving a patient's conflicted conscious and unconscious feelings. based on the sigmund freud's psychoanalytic theory the conception of human consciousness as consisting of the three distinct parts: the id, ego and superego which are based on the belief that unlocking the ...

"abnormal Psychology" This Is An Essay On The Film 'A Beautiful Mind' Discussing Whether The Ideas And Depictions Of Schizophrenia Were Accurate And Relevant To The Context In Which The Film ...

881 words - 4 pages ... schizophrenic at the time (hallucinations and thought alienation). However, there are some problems with Schneider's symptoms, so the film does not 100% reflect modern day opinions. It still is however, an accurate representation based on the context of the film.The methods used to try and treat Nash of his mental disorder in the film included electroconvulsive therapy, taking a special medication and social rehabilitation. These particular forms of ...

Cosmological Argument - Philosophy - Essay

1328 words - 6 pages ... , on a radio broadcast in 1947. One can argue that Russell has a very strong criticism of the cosmological argument, with his key ides being that just because materialistic items and humans within the universe need a cause, it doesn't mean that we can then compare this to the universe, and this is not a strong enough reason to prove the existence of God. He also argues that God may be an exception to the statement 'nothing can cause itself ...

Focus Paper On Stages Of Grief And Parenting Styles - Psychology 2012 - Essay

1455 words - 6 pages ... types of parenting styles, everyone will experience both these concepts every day in their life, either being themselves or a close one. Writing this paper showed me how to understand people better, and learn what they’re going through. Either something’s are going on with their parents or if they feel like they’re losing a loved one. Either way it made me a more of an understanding person and I’m thankful for that. Jose Oliveira Psychology 2012 ...

Biopscyhosocial Effect Of Exercise And Social Interaction On Depression - Psychology 601 At York - Essay

3649 words - 15 pages Free ... 17 EXERCISE AND SOCIAL INTERACTION SELF-STUDY The Effects of Consistent Exercise and Social Interaction on Depression: A Self Study In Partial Requirements of the Masters of Arts in Clinical Psychology Abstract As a student who has struggled with depression due to stress related events, and currently is completing a Master’s of Arts degree while working full-time with three young children, the potential for increases in depression is very high ...

The Effects Of Drugs On The Mind And Body - Southeastern University, Intro To Psychology - Essay

588 words - 3 pages ... activate opioid proteins found on nerve cells in the brain, spinal cord, and other organs throughout the body. This process decreases the pain signals that are transmitted, thereby reducing the level of pain in the individual. The drug also affects the areas of the brain that control emotions, producing a numbing effect for many, which also lowers the intensity of the pain being experienced. A large portion of patients who take this medication ...

The End Of Stigma: Anthropology, Psychology And Sociology - Anthropology, Psychology And Sociology - Essay

2142 words - 9 pages Free ... change their perception. Secondly, stigma from a psychological perspective relates to cognitive psychology. The word cognition refers to the processes in the brain associated with thinking, knowing and remembering. The focus of cognitive psychology is how people perceive and deal with their environment. It is also how people learn and remember. In order to talk about stigma from a psychologists point of view we can focus on how people learn in order ...

Psychology Paper On Beliefs And Values - Social Work - Essay

862 words - 4 pages ... case of a dangerous situation. Being emotionally, physically, and mentally stuck causes a lot of anxiety which can lead to a good outcome or bad. Conclusion Having this Sympathetic System has kept me safe during anxious, scary, and even dangerous situations by helping me sit back and actually think about what’s going on. The system takes place in so many different ways and situations that we don’t even realize. Examples of this could be crying ...

Effects Of Media Exposure On Dreams - Psychology - Essay

598 words - 3 pages ... around them. They might also be more likely to behave aggressively or harm others. A study published in the American Academy of Pediatrics medical journal found that viewing shows in which cooperation and empathy can improve behavior in 3- to 5-year-olds in just six months. Scary images can terrify kids even as they are drawn to them. With toddlers and preschool-aged children, everything can seem much more immediate. So seeing violence on TV can ...

An Analysis Of The Free Will Problem - UNT - Philosophy - Psychology

1506 words - 7 pages ... , in context of an ever-expanding pool of choices and options of human development, does exist, allowing for contextualization and creativity to function in tandem with one another. To begin this argument, there is an importance to be put on the three main argumentative stances. Fully understanding each position’s main points of contention is key to developing a fully fleshed out perspective of what free will is and is not. First, we will discuss ...

Psychology Of Burnout In Youth Sport - Psychology - Assignment

2090 words - 9 pages ... research detailing that fear of experiencing shame and embarrassment has a significant effect on perceived level of stress, burnout and a reduced sense of accomplishment. In Smith’s own findings, he stated “that high stress leads to erroneous or distorted cognitive appraisals by athletes” and that “if perceived demands exceed perceived response capabilities, burnout and negative cognitions will occur”. Conversely, perfectionism is widely accepted as a ...