Sanctions As Instruments Of Us Foreign Policy University Of Buckingham Essay

1989 words - 8 pages

Sanctions as Instruments of US Foreign Policy 1
Sanctions as Instruments of US Foreign Policy
ISAAC OLUSEGUN OLUBO
1404590
US FOREIGN POLICY IN THE POST COLD WAR
DATE: 14/05/2017
Introduction
The US is among the countries that widely use sanctions in efforts to compel a certain government(s) to change their policy appropriately. Usually, the embargos involve the restrictions on trade, investment and other commercial activities. The US mainly applies sanctions to countries which violate human rights, sponsor terror acts, trade unfairly or develop weapons of mass destruction. Depending on the level of the violation, the severity can be mild or extreme. Embargos have become the vehicles of non-military coercion, and the US does not hesitate to use them whenever necessary in order to reinforce the US foreign policy and promote the change of the victim countries for the better. However, the application of sanctions has attracted significant criticism following arguments that they affect the innocent civilians. As such, this paper will discuss how successful sanctions have been as the instruments of the US foreign policy. The discussion will borrow from the case of Cuba.
Failed Sanction Goals
It cannot be said that sanctions have been successful because they are not living up to the set expectations. The case is not only so in Cuba but also other countries such as Iran and North Korea which faces embargos from the US. As hinted earlier, the main problem with the sanctions is that they only hurt the people who the US government is intending to help. For instance, in the case of a trade sanction, a worker in a factory cannot receive raw materials and farmers are unable to export their crops. The US and Cuba has a long history in relation to sanctions. Since the 1960s, the US established strict restrictions barring Americans from investing in, trading with, and traveling to Cuba (White, 2014, p. 22). The primary objective for this sanction was to save this Caribbean Island from the dictatorial regime.
The Castro’s government was tyrannical. It prohibited free elections, and people who opposed the government were jailed, tortured or/and killed (Taylor 2009, p. 27). The country’s economic system was centrally planned, and it was one of the poorest nations. Despite having a small population when compared to other countries, the citizens did not enjoy free enterprise and private property. Hence, the US was determined to sap the regime of Castro and improve the livelihoods of the citizens in this Island. American then set strict measures against the nation hoping that the regime will be forced to hasten the process of liberalization and democracy. The argument was that the economic sanction would deprive Cube of resources thus undermining the Castro’s reign. Along the way, the sanctions also include a security rationale given that Castro served in the Soviet Union in 1991 (Clifford 1993, p. 161). However, service in the Soviet Union was short-lived following the fall of the Soviet Communism.
Despite the restrictions put forward by the US, the regime was still slow in enhancing liberalization. The existence of multiple parties was only legalized in 1991 but with prohibition from campaigning for elections (Taylor 2010, p. 33). By 2005, almost half a century since the initiation of the embargo, Cuba was still not liberalized and it is the citizens who felt the heat. Cuba was poor and dysfunctional, especially since other sponsors also parted ways with the country. In fact, the state was too poor that it did not pose any security threat to America or the neighboring regions. The security issue was a concern because there were unfounded claims that the government of Cuba was supporting terrorists abroad. Therefore, the sanctions were not effective since the citizens of Cuba continued to suffer while the government officials the US intended to suppress led desirable lifestyles at the expense of the civilians. What is the point of having sanctions which hurt the people who the US government wants to help?
Even worse, the sanctions gave the Castro regime a reason to justify their failures. It blamed the embargo for the intense suffering experienced by the state. The government went ahead to suggest that the situation can only change if the sanctions are lifted in order to encourage market reforms. Castro clinched on this claim regardless of the fact that the domestic policies prevailing in Cuba had worse repercussion than the sanctions (Whang 2011, p. 793). Suffice is to say that the US policy failed at its goal to bring freedom and individual development in Cuba. By suppressing investment and trade, the people had to deal with high cost of living. Workers and entrepreneurs in Cuba had insignificant independence, and any surplus realized went to Castro and his ruling group.
The ruling elite did not feel the heat as they insulated themselves meaning that the innocent civilians were the one to bear the pain. Therefore, if the two countries had nurtured a relationship, Cubans would have been able to access low-cost food and goods from the US. Notwithstanding the sanctions, Cuba does not fully acknowledge the religious and political rights of its people and is yet to completely forego its reparation claims against the US. Clearly, the sanctions have not met the set goals.
Lost Opportunities
America is also negatively affected by the sanctions as it loses opportunities to make revenues, particularly through exports. Cuba is one of the largest export markets and by restricting trade with this country denies America the opportunity for Cuba to buy American goods. Not even the introduction of the Trade Sanctions Reform and Export Enhancement Act of 2000 exploited this opportunity. The Act only allowed cash-only sales of American farm products and medical supplies (Neuenkirch & Neumeier 2016, p. 115). In fact, Cuba was among the leading countries that largely bought American farm products.
Hence, the stringent restrictions saw the US underplay the opportunity to substantially increase sales and revenues. Again, the US was unfair as it allowed the sales of farm products and medical supplies to Cuba but still limited the traveling of Americans to Cuba. This would have been essential as the people would benefit from revenues created by tourism. It can thus be argued that the US may use sanctions to enrich itself and this questions its sincerity in helping the people of Cuba. The concern about the lost opportunities the US experienced courtesy of the sanctions is evident after the ease of sanctions spearheaded by President Barrack Obama in 2014.
The loosening of the sanctions regulations was instrumental as it brought changes which made it easier for Americans to travel to Cuba and the legal nonimmigrant Cubans to earn salaries (Davis 2016, p. 1). Americans can travel to Cuba even for educational purposes and encourage meaningful interactions which reduce the dependence of Cubans on the Cuban authorities. On the other hand, permitted nonimmigrant Cubans including athletes and performers can travel to the US and earn salaries and stipends. Banking regulations were also revised, and money from Cuba would pass through US banking institutions to other countries. With the leniency on the US-Cuba relations, Cuba has experienced significant growth and development in various areas including telecommunication, pharmaceuticals, travel and cargo, technology, construction and infrastructure. Today, a good number of US companies have leveraged the warmer relationship and invested in the Cuban market. Major airlines are flying to Cuba from America. For example, Airbnb is experiencing its fastest growth in Cuba. Hotels, banks, cruise ship companies and automobile firms are largely joining the Cuban market as well.
Therefore, the sanctions were barring growth and development for both regions. The US has wasted over a half a century in upholding sanctions which only worsened the situation in Cuba and delayed the progress associated with a healthy relationship between the countries. Inasmuch as the use of sanctions is a powerful weapon, it is important to determine how the sanctions will play out. The point is to avoid adopting embargos frivolously as barring a country from participating in the global financial system can have severe consequences to innocent civilians. The case is especially so because the governments facing sanctions are mostly dictatorial and may not mind the plight of the civilians.
Hence, it is necessary to devise ways in which sanctions can be established to directly inflict the government and the ruling elite without worsening the condition of innocent citizens. Moreover, since it may be difficult to come up with sanctions which do not affect civilians, the US should be establishing the harshest embargos in order to compel the governments to change their behavior within the shortest time possible. This was a case witnessed with Iran forcing the country to reach a deal with the US and agreeing to limit its nuclear program (LeoGrande 2015, 939). With the harshest sanctions, it can be difficult for governments to remain resistant for long as in the case of Cuba.
What the Future Holds
The future still looks bright for the US-Cuba relations, especially because Trump promised a solid and strong deal with Cuba. The president has the executive authority to preside the direction of sanctions as stipulated under the Trading with the Enemy Act (Segall 2016, p. 2). If Trump embarks on a mission to change the policies surrounding the US-Cuba relations, he will be forced to ensure that the two countries reach a better deal. It is unlikely for him to reverse the policy developed by the Obama administration owing to the negative consequences that would ensue. Activities such as telecommunications services and the exportation of agricultural commodities and medical supplies would be limited.
More so, a significant number of US companies are largely investing in Cuba. Trump would not want to interfere with the success of these firms meaning that he will be inclined towards making a better deal. The case is especially so given the Helms-Burton Act which authorizes claimants to sue foreign companies in the US federal court for expropriation (Gershberg 2016, p. 1). The last three presidents have been suspending the Act and Trump can choose to do so or prepared for a series of lawsuits. Nevertheless, the only threat that can potentially disrupt US-Cuba relations is any links to the country to sponsoring terror acts. The US is extremely serious and cautious regarding matters of security and would take any measure to safeguard its citizens. In such an event, Cuba may face harsh sanctions.
References List
Clifford E., G 1993, 'The Illogic of the Logic of US Sanctions against Cuba', Caribbean Studies, 1/2, p. 161, JSTOR Journals, EBSCOhost, viewed 13 June 2017.
Davis, JH 2016, 'Obama Moves to Further Ease Cuba Embargo', The New York Times, 2016, Academic OneFile, EBSCOhost, viewed 13 June 2017.
Dyer, G 2016, 'Lew says overuse of financial sanctions can hurt US influence', The Financial Times, 2016, Academic OneFile, EBSCOhost, viewed 13 June 2017.
Gershberg, MT 2016, 'U.S. Further Eases Cuban Sanctions', Mondaq Business Briefing, 2016, General OneFile, EBSCOhost, viewed 13 June 2017.
LeoGrande, WM 2015, 'A policy long past its expiration date: US economic sanctions against Cuba', Social Research, 4, p. 939, Academic OneFile, EBSCOhost, viewed 13 June 2017.
Neuenkirch, M, & Neumeier, F 2016, 'The impact of US sanctions on poverty', Journal Of Development Economics, 121, pp. 110-119, ScienceDirect, EBSCOhost, viewed 13 June 2017.
Segall, W 2016, 'Obama Administration Further Eases Sanctions In Advance Of Cuba Visit', Mondaq Business Briefing, 2016, Business Insights: Essentials, EBSCOhost, viewed 13 June 2017.
Taylor, B 2009, American Sanctions In The Asia-Pacific, London: Routledge, eBook Index, EBSCOhost, viewed 13 June 2017.
Taylor, B 2010, Sanctions As Grand Strategy, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, eBook Index, EBSCOhost, viewed 13 June 2017.
Whang, T 2011, 'Playing to the Home Crowd? Symbolic Use of Economic Sanctions in the United States', International Studies Quarterly, 55, 3, pp. 787-801, Academic Search Premier, EBSCOhost, viewed 13 June 2017.
White, ND 2014, The Cuban Embargo Under International Law : El Bloqueo, Hoboken: Routledge, eBook Index, EBSCOhost, viewed 13 June 2017.

RELATED

Assess the impact of ideology of Nazi Foreign policy up to 1939 - Scots 12 - Essay

1217 words - 5 pages Assess the impact of ideology on Nazi Foreign policy to September 1939 Ideology was the single most important factor in the development of Nazi foreign policy up to 1939, both in underpinning long term goals and determining short term strategies. The ideology centered around beliefs of Social darwinism, Anti-Semitism, nationalism and anti communism, and their impact can be seen through their translation into successful foreign policies such as

The United States Foreign Policy Of Neutrality In The Early Years Of The Country

475 words - 2 pages The first foreign policy of the United States was neutrality. Just overcoming the English and getting liberty, the US faced the difficult undertaking of forming a new country. In an attempt to protect themselves from taking part in the quarrels of the Europeans and focusing on domestic affairs, a path of neutrality was followed. The roots of this first strategy can be seen as early as the administration of George Washington.Soon after

Adolf Hitler's Foreign Policy goals - Orange County - Essay

954 words - 4 pages suggested that “Germany positively affect the sustenance of the German people by peaceful economic means, as up to now. Accordingly even in the future she will participate most decisively in world industry, export and trade…. From a folkish standpoint setting this foreign policy aim is calamitous and it is madness from the point of view of power politics” (Spielvogel 851). He did not believe in this goal either. Third, Hitler suggested “Germany

Thomas Edison : the US Inventor - University of LA - Essay

745 words - 3 pages . They tried carbonized paper, and tested some species of vegetable fibers. They have experimented bamboo, then Tungsten and the Nitrogen for vacuum, but essentially Edison’s lamp was the same as those used today. The incandescent lamp or the electric light bulb brought new opportunities for Edison and to his country, America. Several new industries, including the electric light and power industry, were built based on his invention. He was awarded 1

Survey of US History C121 WGU Task 4 - Western Governors University C121 US History - Performance Assessment-Essay

1387 words - 6 pages a fear of anything foreign, his idea of “them” versus “us” influenced his approach to world affairs. According to some, Stalin was clinically insane (Norton, 2015). Truman was not nearly as ruthless as Stalin and did not compromise his own people but he, also, was prone to a “them” versus “us” view. Truman preferred straight answers and ultimatums over ambiguities and counter-evidence. Truman was an exaggerator who claimed leaders folded under

Survey of US History C121 WGU Task 5 - Western Governors University C121 US History - Performance Assessment-Essay

421 words - 2 pages Free (Brock, 2002). In Chapter 6 of the textbook, Norton highlights the growing tensions between the US and England as the country heads for war with its mother-country when Thomas Jefferson began writing the Declaration of Independence (2015). 3.  The two articles relate to each other through two major themes: taxes and religion. In both instances, the population of this time period were opposed to paying taxes. While religious persons sought more

Survey of US History C121 WGU Task 3 - Western Governors University C121 US History - Performance Assessment-Essay

1350 words - 6 pages Sara Layland Professor Kris Teters Survey of US History 23 August 2018 C121 Task Three A. Major changes in race relations resulting from Reconstruction The Thirteenth Amendment in 1865 abolished slavery. Some black persons went to find new employment, failed, and return to their owners, but tried to negotiate working conditions. General Sherman’s special Field Order, issued in 1865, set aside 40 acres of land and mules in the Sea Islands were

Survey of US History C121 WGU Task 1 - Western Governors University C121 US History - Performance Assessment-Essay

1026 words - 5 pages should pay more because of their benefit from the war. Money from the patriots was banned in the Currency Act, as they were paying British merchants with inflated currency. The Americans felt that paying taxes was unfair, due to having no representation in parliament (Norton, 2015). C.3 Intolerable Acts Because of the Boston Tea Party, where about 60 Bostonians dressed as Indians and dumped crates of tea into Boston Harbor, Parliament had had

Ancestory essay: about the history of my family - lander university, US History - essay

817 words - 4 pages way it made her appreciate the little things because she worked hard for them, almost in a humbling way. Working as much as she did, she didn’t get to experience life like other teenagers. She claimed to never have fun. Why? because after a long day of work, she was always tired and would have to come home to either clean or cook so by the end of the day all she wanted to do was rest for the next day. While other girls were chasing boys she never

A Critical Review of The Prince - junior, Beijing Foreign Studies University - book review

1550 words - 7 pages Counterarguments and Inconsistencies in The Prince ——A Reader-Friendly Review The Prince is a political treatise written by Machiavelli in 1513 when Italy became the center of intense political conflict. Machiavelli composed the pamphlet as a practical guide for ruling and hoped to gain himself an advisory position in the government by dedicating the book to the ruler of Florence. The major theme addressed in the book can be concluded as ends

Ideologies in US rejection of Paris Agreement - Northern Illinois University; POLS 285 - Essay

2065 words - 9 pages why foreign lobbyists wish to keep our magnificent country tied up…” This tells us that with the “tit-for-tat” deal is not found in this agreement because it’s taking more out of American than it is giving. Another reason, according to Neoliberals, is that backing out was for the state’s self-interests. The deal will have the United States lose money that could be spent on other domestic programs. As Trump (2017) states, “…we won’t be closing up

Why the US Constitution did not contain a Bill of Rights - California State University, Northridge - Essay

1171 words - 5 pages at the outset of this nation were possibly the two most cooperative in history despite being so polarized; The Federalists and Antifederalists. The Antifederalists were originally supportive of the Articles of Confederation, America’s first constitution, which weighed in favor of states’ rights. The Constitution as we know it today was a recent and newly drafted document, which the Antifederalists believed would give too much power to the

Inflation priority of UK macroeconomic policy? - Parmiters School Economics - Essay

1228 words - 5 pages To what extent do you agree that maintaining inflation at the target rate of 2% should be the top priority of UK macroeconomic policy? Justify your answer The UK government has given the Bank of England an inflation target of CPI 2 % +/-1. The Bank of England is responsible for using monetary policy (e.g. interest rates)  to achieve this goal of low inflation. But, as well as targeting inflation, the Bank of England also has a wider remit of

a role of government in policy making - texas government - essay

732 words - 3 pages Chapter 5 &11 Campaigns and Elections Political campaigns are exceptionally huge in American governmental issues and decisions. It is the period before the electorate settles on political choices as elections. The consideration of the citizens towards governmental issues increases as the date of the elections moves close. The striking nature of voters improves as the election date moves close and could show as expanded media consideration

Plastic Pollution and the urgency of taking action - Richmond University - Policy paper

2194 words - 9 pages Security Studies Environmental Issues Elisa Kunz Dr. Kyriakopoulou Richmond the American International University in London Content Executive Summary Problem statement Three options for possible resolution Recommendation II. The Problem Plastic pollution issues Impact on the ocean’s wildlife Impact on the Human health III. Three policy solutions Individuals responsibility of reducing plastic consumption Governments and industries