Should Socrates Have Taken His Death Sentence?

866 words - 4 pages

Socrates was a great Greek philosopher whose ideas and teaching methods are still known and used even until this day. He was born around 470 B.C., in Athens and was a stonecutter and Athenian soldier before he became a teacher. He first learned his father's art, but later dedicated himself to thought and to philosophic teaching without compensation, in spite of his destitution. He was one who questioned all the generally accepted ideas of Athens but demanded standards of truth and reason.Socrates instructed by what is now known as the "Socratic method". He educated his students not by memorization but by asking questions. He advised the population to find their own answers to their questions and query their elders. Socrates wanted everyone to investigate and question things like politics, and more specifically, democracy. Furthermore, he concentrated all his attention on the search for moral ideas and values; he was convinced that the practice of morals and ethics must come first before justice could come through. He was opposed to that damaging idea which was the basis of the Sophists teachings.Many of the citizens of Athens, including the Sophists, did not like what Socrates was teaching. Socrates was indicted of denying the gods recognized by the state and introducing instead of them strange divinities and of corrupting the young. In truth, he really believed in the gods, he was just questioning them.However, he was brought to trial in front of 501 jurors. Socrates said it was his conscience that made him teach and as long as he lived, he would keep teaching. He even asked the state for a pension for all his years of service. Declared guilty by a small majority, sixty votes, he stood with resolute spirit before the trial, and was condemned to death.In my opinion, Socrates was honorable in drinking the poison to his death. He had to take the hemlock, which was the least painful way to die compared to other options. If he lived and escaped somewhere else, he might have faced a far worse death. Most citizens in Athens did not approve of his teachings and there was a very high chance that he would not have had survived long. By dying then, and drinking the hemlock, he would not have to endure more unnecessary pain.Socrates was already seventy years old when he was put on trial. By our standard, that was quite old, in Athenian timers, he was already way past his due date. Eventually, he was going to die and in all likelihood, sooner. By dying in front of the population of Athens, he was defending his work and going for his cause. His followers already had an escape plan ready for him to leave any moment. Socrates refused, however, declaring that he did not wish to fail at any cost in obedience to his country's laws.I think that Socrates made the correct decision in the end. I think the main reason he was correct was that he was defending his work. By dying for his teachings and what he believed in, he was sending out the message that he was justified. If he had taken the other way, the easy way out and escaped, Socrates would have had seemed like a hypocrite. The public were more likely to follow his teachings because he felt so strongly about them. He probably even gained more followers by taking his death sentence; he was a martyr for the right to think.Even until the last moments of his death, Socrates calmly explained the flaws in the reasoning of the Sophists. Individuals today know what he said in his last moments. If he had run away, many followers could have had lost their respect for him and start to question his morals and values. Socrates was a great thinker and was ahead of his time. He was simply at the wrong place in the wrong time.It is not a question of what we would do; it is what Socrates should have done. Socrates disregarded to defend himself and thus made compromises to the judges to the point of humiliating himself before them, more or less excusing his actions. Socrates could see, not a practical acquittal for his earthly life but, rather, the eternal judgment of reason for immortality. He preferred death to living.Although we will never know, I truly feel that Socrates taking his sentence is what made him so revered. Today, we recognize Socrates as one of the greatest philosophers that ever lived. It is because he led such a fulfilling life even to the very end. It is because he stood his ground in what he firmly believed in. It must have been hard to face the death sentence, but he strongly stood firm. He was Socrates and he died for his beliefs.

More like Should Socrates Have Taken His Death Sentence?

Who Is Socrates? An Essay On His Philosophy - Philosophy BC - Essay

2005 words - 9 pages ... said, and they beg using tears, their children, and influence in order to gain a lighter and wrong sentence. Socrates also presents his hesitation to democracy in Book Six of the Republic. In Book Six, Socrates explained to Adeimantus his position on democracy by comparing society in Athens to a ship. Socrates described a ship that is without a captain but has many sailors. Each sailor feels that they have a claim to the helm, but the best ...

Plato's Apology- How Socrates Was A Negative Effect On Athens

1232 words - 5 pages ... spread. In reality, Meletus and the other citizens responsible for Socrates' trial and death sentence actually saved his message through martyrdom before he could finish his mission and offend the rest of Athens. For if he had, his message would have been tarnished along with his name, rather than both being immortalized. Not only was Socrates guilty of harming the mental and emotional stability of Athens' citizens, he also managed to undermine ...

Analysis Of The Apology Os Socrate - CLA UC Davis - Essay

2109 words - 9 pages ... Analysis of The Apology of Socrates by Plato Socrates was a Greek philosopher and orator who were honored as one of the fathers of Western philosophy and had far-reaching influence on Western philosophy. However, it’s worth mentioning that Socrates himself didn’t have any written piece. This work was written by his student, Plato, narrating the forensic speech of Socrates delivered at his death trail in 399 BC. During the time, Socrates was ...

This Is A Report On The Book "gorgias" By Plato

520 words - 3 pages ... dictators speak without having real knowledge and he would trade places with any dictator. Socrates says that that would not be good because most dictators do wrong to others without having wrong done onto them. Socrates says that all wrongdoing is done out of ignorance. That is to say a man robs people because he does not understand the impact his actions have on the economy. Not to mention the general well being of his victims. Socrates believes ...

What Is Socrates’ Argument That No Harm Can Come To A Good Man - Thompson River University PHIL-1110 - Philosophy Paper

1524 words - 7 pages ... personal daemon and that it never spoke up when it came time for him to decide whether or not to fight his charges. He says that his daemon would have opposed him if death was an evil (pg. 8). Socrates’ daemon, or “prophetic voice” (pg.8) as he called it would be what we refer to in today’s terms as his conscience. Socrates seems to have a remarkably developed conscience so much so that he would go into deep trances when he was communing with it ...

Why Was Socrates Found Guilty? Was He Fairly Tried

2988 words - 12 pages ... wrote anything himself. Everything we know of him is drawn from a variety of sources, all of which have their own biases and inaccuracies to account for. The death of Socrates gave birth to a whole new literary genre of 'Socratic' dialogues. Many were by close friends keen to defend his name, while some, such as the works of the Sophist Polycrates (who wrote a pamphlet which reproduced a version of Anytus' prosecution speech, justifying Socrates ...

Philosophy Assignment

955 words - 4 pages ... Section (A): Concepts and Distinctions 2. Briefly outline Socrates' 'Turn towards Humanism.' In what did this 'turn' consist, and how did it set Socrates apart from his pre-Socratic predecessors? Socrates' 'Turn towards Humanism' was something Socrates chose as his primary focus in philosophy as he believed that before learning the nature of the universe and everything else in it, we must know and understand the nature of human beings and ...

Socrates

469 words - 2 pages ... have been a denial of the told truth. Any kind of escape or evading of his penalty would have meant disavowing who he had been and what he had been saying. Had he been a judge, he would have been a just judge, and would have found himself innocent (as he showed when they asked him to suggest a penalty). But once the unjust verdict had fallen, it was not his role to prevent its being executed. Socrates believed that it was better to submit than ...

Socrates On The Soul And Human Happiness - Emory - Philosophy 400 - Essay

4129 words - 17 pages ... mention ad hominem in his support. The first is evident when he says to Socrates, “Don’t you think you’ve been refuted already, Socrates, when you’re saying things the likes of which no human being would maintain? Just ask any one of these people” (Gorgias 817). How he can also say after this, “You really do think it’s the way I say it is” (Gorgias 815), is unintelligible, but should not come as a surprise given Polus’ stubborn, impulsive nature. In ...

Socratic Dialectic

1336 words - 6 pages ... (truth) might be found' . What is the point in the story of Euthyphro is that Socrates gets him to examine his own knowledge of the word 'pious' and to realise that to embody piety, he must have the knowledge to what it is. In response, Euthyphro claims that piety is that which pleases the gods. To Euthyphro, Socrates asks "What gods? What is pleasing to one god might displease another. " As Socrates' logical questioning reduces Euthyphro's moral ...

Rhetoric In Language

1122 words - 5 pages Free ... its moral implications before proceeding. Socrates firmly believes that one should be accountable for his/her deeds and must also be able to reasonably defend choices that were made. He views rhetoric as an act of self-gratification and pleasure and he proves it through examining Gorgias and his students (who are merely a mirror of society). Rhetoric is simply a method of persuasion employed by Gorgias. Persuasion for Socrates comes in two forms ...

Sophocles, Life, Teachings, And Trial

1407 words - 6 pages ... toward the Athenian state and the established religion, many people were displeased with his affect on his pupils. Athenian jury found him guilty of corrupting the youth and interfering with the religion of the city, and sentenced him to death, by drinking poisonous hemlock in 399 B.C.E. He was also charged with neglecting the god of the state and introducing new divinities, a reference to the mystical inner voice that Socrates often spoke of.At ...

Plato's Life Essay

969 words - 4 pages Free ... was around the age of twenty when he met Socrates and became his pupil. Socrates made a tremendous impact on Plato. Socrates was one of some people that greatly influenced Plato. Plato was twenty-nine years old when he witnessed the death of Socrates, who died because he was charged with the crime of impiety. After Socrates' death Plato left Athens for approximately twelve years. Everything Socrates believed in influenced Plato. Socrates was ...

Socrates' Ideas Today

1886 words - 8 pages ... -heartilybelieved that worshiping the gods was essential to their city's well being. In his ideas, Socrates went against this, which was a direct insult to everyone who believed in the majority's ideas. It must have been seen as an attack on their culture that they held closely.Socrates' end should have served as a fearful mark in history for all those who dared to speak out against the hegemony. Fortunately, this didn't stop people. In 1751, during the time ...

The Unjust Prosecution Of Socrates - Ave Maria University, Western Civilization Honors, Sugrue - Short Essay On Trial Of Socrates

548 words - 3 pages ... them hate me, and what is their hatred but a proof that I am speaking the truth.” (24). Even Meletus, the lead prosecutor, was no match for Socrates wit and intellect, for when Socrates was given the chance to cross- examine Meletus, he completely unraveled Meletus’ argument. Socrates trapped Meletus into saying, “I say that you do not believe in any gods at all” (26) and then exposes his allegation as illogical. Socrates may have been guilty of ...