The Crucible, By Arthur Miller

1685 words - 7 pages

This essay is about the moral dilemma John Proctor is faced with. It analyzes the good/bad sied of the two options, to lie and live or to tell the truth and die. Contains quotes and specific details. I sugesst students of Spaulding HS in Barre do not use this.The Crucible-By Arthur MillerIn our lives, we are faced with many life altering choices, many of which are based on one main subject; right versus wrong, or good versus bad. In The Crucible by Arthur Miller, a character named John Proctor is faced with a great moral dilemma. Should he put his reputation on the line to save his life, or tell the truth and die an honest man? John Proctor must decide between these two horrible fates, as a once sane Christian town falls down around him, and all faith in God is lost.The Crucible is set back in 1692, in Salem Massachusetts. As a strictly puritan society, the people of Salem had been held under tough authority, and in the midst of it, had been searching for ways to get back at each other. When the Reverend Parris's niece, daughter, and slave are found with many other village girls dancing in the woods and conjuring spirits, the villagers believed that the devil was walking in Salem. When the group of girls who had been dancing in the woods were questioned about their actions "cried out" against women and men in the town, saying that they were witches and had told them to do it. One of these girls was Abigail Williams, the Reverend Parris's niece. Abigail had been having an affair with John Proctor, a well respected and revered farmer in Salem. As the story continues, Abigail accuses John's wife, Elizabeth Proctor, of trying to murder her so that Elizabeth will be hung with all of the other condemned witches. In his haste to free his wife, John goes to the court to confess his affair with Abigail, and her reasons for wanting Elizabeth dead. When Elizabeth is brought before the court to confirm John's confession, she lies and says that he did not commit adultery. Soon after, John tries to get his servant (one of the girls found dancing in the woods) Mary Warren to tell the court that the girls causing every one are frauds. But in doing this, John himself is accused by Mary, and is sent to jail with all of the others accused.This is when John Proctor is faced with a moral dilemma. If he lies, and signs a confession saying that he made a compact with the devil, he will live, blackening his name forever. But if he tells the truth and will not confess to witchcraft, then he will hang with the others, and die an honest death. In the end, John chooses to tell the truth, hoping to cleanse his already sinful name, and also keeping the names of his friends clean. I see this as the right thing to do. By telling the truth, John clears his own conscience, and keeps his good name, being remembered throughout Salem as a martyr.There are several things that have caused this moral dilemma bestowed upon John Proctor. When Abigail told John about the dancing and the conjuring of spirits that she and the other girls had done in the woods, he didn't say anything to the Judge Danforth or Reverend Hale when the whole suspicion of witchcraft came about. If he had, it may have stopped the ordeal because the girls wouldn't have been so wrapped up in the trails with no way to escape when Hale and Danforth finally did find out. Another example would be that if John hadn't had the affair with Abigail, then she wouldn't have had any reason of accusing his wife of witchcraft, which would also mean that he would never been accused either. If it weren't for the things that John Proctor had done himself, keeping secrets and committing sins in the first place, then he probably wouldn't be faced with this moral dilemma.And now, John is faced with two choices, one of which is to lie and live, confessing to the charge of witchcraft. If he chooses to take this option, there will be both good and bad outcomes. If John does this, he will be able to return home after a few months in jail and he could live to raise his sons, as he explains to Rebecca while contemplating his decision before confessing to Danforth, "Let them that never lied die now to keep their souls. It is pretense for me, a vanity that will not blind God nor keep my children out of the wind." If John chooses to lie, he could raise his children, and go back to living a quiet life with Elizabeth. On the downside of lying to save his life though, John would feel forever guilty with his decision of letting his friends die while he lied to keep alive. With the tremendous guilt that he had after his affair with Abigail, and the guilt of lying about his confession, John would feel even more worthless than he did before.The second choice that Proctor is faced with, is to tell the truth, and hang with all of his friends who refuse to sell themselves out to lies. If Proctor does this, he will no longer be the sinful man he thinks himself to be, and will have a clean name. When John is signing the confession, and is trying to convince judge Danforth not to put the confession on the church door, he tells the judge "Because it is my name! Because I cannot have another in my life...I lie and sign myself to lies! ...How may I live without my name? I have given you my soul; leave me my name!" This shows that John cares about his reputation, and if that confession were put on the door of the church, he would never be able to forgive himself for lying. Also, a reason to tell the truth is that he would be a good role model for his sons, who may other wise look down upon him as a coward in their older years if he was to lie, "I have three children--how may I teach them to walk like men in the world, and I sold my friends?" Another reason that John makes the choice to tell the truth is that he would keep the names of his friends clean, and not betray them. When John is speaking with Danforth again, he says "I blacken all of them when this is nailed to the church door the very day they hang for silence!" All of these examples show the reasons why John should tell the truth.I think that John Proctor made the right choice when he decided to tell the truth. I know that it would be a tough decision to make in such a short amount of time, and that any modern day person would lie to keep their life. But back in the Puritan times, having a bad reputation was like dying. You could be shunned by the community, or excommunicated entirely. So this is why I believe that if I were in Proctor's shoes, I would decide to tell the truth. I have strong morals now, so if I had grown up back then, I believe that they would be even stronger. Reputation is a major part of me, I take pride in getting decent grades and usually making the decisions that will make me better as a person. Even though they aren't always right, I usually can decipher the difference between right and wrong. I would not be able to lie about some thing that I absolutely did not believe in, especially some thing that would ruin life. I would also not be able to let my friend's hang (like Proctor was going to) and lie to keep myself alive for the same reason that they would hang for. I wouldn't be able to live with myself if I did. Maybe if I was actually put in that situation during these times (which is very unlikely), I would change my mind, but like I said, back then I think that my faith and loyalty would get in the way. I would tell the truth as Proctor did.In The Crucible, John Proctor is faced with a hard decision, to live his life with a lie that would haunt him until the day that he died, or be truthful and die as a good man to himself and his fellow friends. In the end I think that John does make the right decision, and even though he loses his life for his decision, he forgave himself for the sins that he once committed, and that probably got him into this moral dilemma in the first place. He answered the question that he asked himself while he signed the false confession "What is John Proctor?" He realized the John Proctor was a good man, with faults like every human, and that by being truthful, he would accept forgiveness for the sins he once committed. He would be a role model to his children, he would have a clean name, regain the trust and forgiveness of his wife, and he would not betray his friends. John Proctor would see himself not as a saint, like Rebecca Nurse, but as a man with faults who would die for the salvation of his soul and his own forgiveness.

More like Essay On The Crucible, By Arthur Miller

"the Crucible" By Arthur Miller: John Proctor Charachter Analysis: Outline

649 words - 3 pages ... name!" (Miller 133)D. After this statement, Proctor tears up the piece of paper. These actions show that he would rather die with a good name than live with a bad one. Instead of living, he stands up for what he knows is right to his death.VI. ConclusionA. The Crucible by Arthur MillerB. Relations in history: Martin Luther King, Jr., Rosa Parks, HolocaustC. Restate thesis: John Proctor stood his ground to his death.D. Other characters show acts of fighting for what the believe in, while John Proctor ruins his good name by confessing to lechery and still dies because he believes in his cause, even though his good name is already ruined.E. Final thoughts ...

A Report On The Play "incident At Vichy" By Arthur Miller

815 words - 4 pages Free ... Incident at Vichy, by Arthur Miller, takes place in 1942 France. The play consists of dialogue between the characters, eight men and a boy, while they await an unknown fate in the detention room of a Vichy police station. Not only does the play tell of the horrors of the Holocaust through rumors that the men exchange, but it also deals with major themes of guilt, self-sacrifice, and honor. Through characters with different beliefs, attitudes ...

"canticle For Leibowitz" By Arthur M. Miller Jr

891 words - 4 pages ... Walter Miller, in the novel A Canticle For Leibowitz, mocks the way we are as humans, particularly in those ways that lead to regressive thinking. The novel pokes fun at the attention to impractical details, such as to the spent copying the Leibowitz blueprints. Miller also mocks humans by describing the inordinate amount of attention and energy given to a spiritual being such as Leibowitz, as today's society worships God. Finally, the most ...

All My Sons, A Play By Arthur Miller - Touro College, Writing And Composition II - Research Papaer

1582 words - 7 pages ... once wisely put it: "The price of greatness is responsibility."  Works Cited  Jones, Douglas A. "All My Sons." Masterplots, Fourth Edition (2010): 1-3. Literary Reference Center. Web. 29 May 2016.  Abbotson, Susan C. W.. Student Companion to Arthur Miller. Westport, US: Greenwood Press, 2000. ProQuest ebrary. Web. 5 June 2016. ...

Letter From Marco To His Wife A View From The Bridge Arthur Miller - Literature - Creative Piece/letter

813 words - 4 pages ... particularly, ever since he first started taking Catherine out. The air has become thick at the Carbone house. Eddie seems quite over-protective of Catherine, especially when she’s not even his daughter. Last night, something peculiar happened. Catherine was discussing Rodolpho’s talents and Eddie demeaned him by belittling what Rodolpho had decided to spend his paycheck on. I did somewhat agree with Eddie, Rodolpho should be more wise when spending money ...

Daisy Miller, By Henry James: (I) To What Extent Is Daisy Miller's Character A Reflection Of The American Character? (II) Was Henry James' Ending Artistically Necessary?

495 words - 2 pages ... Daisy Miller, ubiquitous flirt, cavorts around with mysterious Italian romantics and remains contemptuous and ignorant of European social customs during her short stay in the Old World. On an intimate level, Daisy's story is one about a young woman's hedonistic adventures in a world where hedonism has no place. Daisy's self-indulgent, pleasure-seeking lifestyle is typical of the American capitalist world, and her untimely death is a literary and ...

THE CRUCIBLE

343 words - 2 pages ... What's Real What's Not Is The Crucible, The Salem Witch project, too conflicting to be fact, or are they too similar to be fiction? Arthur Miller distorted many things while creating the plot of the crucible. In attendance are many similarities between "The Salem Witch trials A Chronology of Events" and the outline of the Crucible (created by our group); at the same time there are many differences. Were their some differences between the ...

The Characters Of The Crucible's Faith Being Tested - Westwood English 2 - Essay

425 words - 2 pages ... Crucible Definition The Crucible​ is full of tests of characters’ character, faith, and beliefs through the court. The definition of crucible is a severe test, as of patience or belief; a trial. This could be why Arthur Miller chose to name his play ​The Crucible​. Characters such as Elizabeth Proctor, John Proctor, Rebecca Nurse, and many others are tested, whether they are innocent or guilty. The responses of the characters varies, however. In ...

The Characters In "crucible"

556 words - 3 pages ... it came to the situation that someone was singled out; their first instinct was to point a finger at the other person. John Proctor, despite a history of lechery and apparent religious rebellion, was among the noble few who refused to evade guilt by refocusing the accusations towards someone else. Thus, one can learn a valuable lesson from the humble, honest farmer who took responsibility for his actions. "Crucible" by Arthur Miller ...

Essential Components Of Manipulation - Youngker High School English III - Essay

458 words - 2 pages ... Makenzzie Parsons Mrs. Edgett Period 3 18 April 2018 Unit 3 Essay Although some believe that trust and innocence are the essential components of manipulation, The Crucible by Arthur Miller provides evidence that gullibility and force are the essential components of manipulation. The essential components of manipulation are gullibility and force because one must be gullible enough to believe in what you are trying to get them to do, but also you ...

The Role Of Reputation In The Crucible - English 4 - Essay

939 words - 4 pages ... Hawkins Andrew Hawkins Heather Mullman English II Pre-AP/Honors 6 February 2019 The Role of Reputation in The Crucible Reputation is an extremely important aspect of society, and was even of greater importance in the 17th century. Without a satisfactory reputation, it's near impossible to completely fit into society. Throughout The Crucible, the play by Arthur Miller, reputation is seen as a saving grace for some, or a fatal flaw for the unlucky ...

Essay About Arthur Miller

347 words - 2 pages ... Arthur Miller is one of America's most famous playwrights. Although his dramas take place in familiar settings, he has made a reputation for dealing with contemporary, political, and moral issues. Miller's work continues to inspire and teach people about American life and values.Arthur Miller was born in New York City on October 17, 1915. He attended the University of Michigan where he began writing plays. Several of these plays won awards. In ...

Who Is To Blame For The Outcome Of The Crucible - English 11 - Essay

838 words - 4 pages ... once Abigail started them. The conflict in Salem causes paranoia and tragedy throughout the town. Abigail Williams may have started the the initial problem, cannot ultimately be blamed for the outcome of the Salem Witch Trials. Branson �4 Works Cited Miller , Arthur. The Crucible: Arthur Miller. Spark Pub., 2014. ...

The Crucible And Liberty Leading The People Essay - English - Essay

911 words - 4 pages ... Evaluate the ways that the nature of political power is represented and critiqued in your prescribed text and ONE other text of your own choosing. Politics is a complex human construct, often manipulated and redefined by individuals in the  process of pursuing power and self preservation. Influential composers often critique and  explore the fractured nature of politics - such as Arthur Miller and Eugene Delacroix through  The Crucible ​ and ...

John Proctor As A Tragic Hero In The Crucible - English - Essay

1206 words - 5 pages Free ... John Proctor as a Tragic Hero in The Crucible The ancient Greeks invented tragedy for theater in order to explore concepts of humanity like duty, suffering, and fate. These tragedies would often follow the story of a good character whose downfall was brought by their own flaws. Although they have suffered, the character accepts their ultimate demise with dignity. This archetype is known as the tragic hero. In Arthur Miller’s The Crucible, John ...