English IV
There are many debated First amendment cases that the courts deal with in everyday life. Whether it is protester against war wearing offensive clothing, a political activist burning the American flag, or a Nazi demonstrating in a Jewish neighborhood. There is a lot to be said on each of these cases. Although the emotional reaction to the content of the speech with the demonstrations is understandable to some, the fact is---sticks and stones may hurt my bones, but names will never hurt me. Although various cases question The Bill of Rights, (Who Wrote The Bill of Rights?) the understanding of it combines in a manner of protection or amendment
The Bill of Rights (Who Wrote The Bill of Rights?) is the term used for the opening ten modifications to the U.S. Constitution. Initially projected by James Madison and George Mason in the first Congress in 1789-1791, and can be expected in the Pavilion at the National Archives Museum. It reads, Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances (The Bill of Rights: A Transcription par. 24). Moreover, Support among American high school students for the First Amendment is stronger today than it has been in the last 12 years, according to the latest in a series of large nationwide surveys of the nations rising voters (Chokshi par. 1).
The landmark and court cases associated with The First Amendment (Who Wrote The Bill of Rights?) depicts a few illustrations between parties that presents slanderous statements against someones character. The landmark case New York Times Co. v. Sullivan (New York Times Co. v. Sullivan par. 6), represents false information reported in the New Yorks newspaper about the Montgomery Commissioner. The Commissioner, who was over the police department did supervise the police officers who allegedly arrested Rev. King. They also allegedly locked the cafeteria where the students ate, and allegedly accused the Montgomery police of answering the Kings protest with intimidation and violence (New York Times Co. v. Sullivan par. 6).
The Montgomery Commissioner Additionally accused the New York paper of actual malice. This false or reckless information was miss-guided information. A few false statements were things like using the word they to represent the wrong by the police and the Commissioner were doing. Additionally, the song that was song was not the correct song, the true reason the students were expelled, and the number of times Dr. King was arrested along with the bombing of his home was all incorrect information (New York Times Co. v. Sullivan par. 6). The results ended with the Commissioner receiving $500,000 in damages. In addition, to this landmark case is the case illustrating the right to practice religion.
In the landmark case of Burwell...
