Machiavelli, the Italian philosopher, was famous for his work The Prince - a book he wrote in 1513.
The Prince was where he wrote the famous line: ‘better to be loved than feared or feared than loved?’ The
public have mixed views on the topic and therefore sprouted different insights to it. Although the public
would prefer a leader that they love, they need a leader to fear. If they fear a leader, they fear the actions.
Although it it easier to be feared, the importance of it lies entirely with the leader and the way they
manipulate the fear. Lee Kuan Yew, Machiavelli, Jack from Lord of the Flies, and John Locke all have
evidence that supports this theory.
Lee Kuan Yew was the Senior Minister of Singapore before passing at the age of 91. He governed
Singapore with an iron fist which is one of the reasons that it is such a safe city-state. When the article from
The New York Times was published in his passing, the author writes: ‘His leadership undoubtedly helped
make Singapore one of the richest and least corrupt countries in the world.’ In a way, the author of the article
had praised Lee Kuan Yew’s leadership skills and the way that it had turned Singapore into the place it is
today. Lee Kuan Yew has used intimidation to his advantage, and showed no shame in doing so. He reveled
in the fact that his use of power was getting noticed. Singapore is one of the safest places in the world and if
Lee Kuan Yew lead the country as a democracy, then it certainly would not have been. If a leader uses
coercion and fear to improve the country in the best way possible, there should be no reason for them to be
overthrown. Machiavelli actively agrees with the statement in his book, The Prince.
Machiavelli’s The Prince is a perfect example of using coercion to stay in power. Although he
became a philosopher for the money and fame, his ideas were not put to waste. His idea about a Prince
doing whatever it takes to stay in power is a perfect example as to why it is better to be feared than loved.
When describing men and what they would do for their ruler, Machiavelli writes: ‘you succeed they are
yours entirely; they will offer you their blood, property, life, and children,’ Machiavelli always believed that
men were not born tabula rasa - contrary to popular belief - and that men were born with a little bit of evil
already in them, Machiavelli often writes that people are dishonest and always need something. Having this
said already, Machiavelli thought that with a ruler that knows the people, this would change. The people
would offer anything - like their blood, life, and children - when the need is distant, but as soon as the time
comes, they will turn against you. Why...