This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

What Are The Main Moral Quandaries In Relation To Moral Relativism? Especially Given Increasing Globalisation, Is Moral Relativism A Suitable Solution To Moral Conflicts Between Cultures?

2101 words - 9 pages

Let me begin with a definition of 'moral relativism'. It is the acceptance that there are no standards of what is right or wrong that apply to all people at all times in history. For example, the ability for one group to pass judgment on any situation, when the same situation would be treated differently by another group. Thus showing that different persons have different perspectives on what is morally right or wrong. Moral relativists hold that no universal standard exists by which to assess an ethical proposition's truth, moral subjectivism is therefore the opposite of moral absolutism. Moral absolutism is the position that there are absolute standards against which moral questions can be ...view middle of the document...

However, there is already a flaw in moral relativism, it seems to be inconsistent when it states that there are no universal truth, stating the judgment as if it were a universal truth. Thus, a statement 'that there are no universal truths' is actually self refuting by implying that the same statement can both be true or false or both. Philip Hugly and Charles Sayward use an example of 'native of India and a native of Lincoln, Nebraska. The former says, "Killing this cow for human consumption is wrong". The latter replies, "I disagree, it is not wrong". These statements cannot be both true and false. Hugly and Sayward use the 'truth value relativism' and 'content relativism' to ease this quandary and go on to say that 'truth value relativism is the best version of relativism.'We can get no truth value from the content of an assertion until we fix the judge relative to whom it is true.Subjectivism is the extreme end of relativism. This view holds that morality is determined at the individual level, not a social or universal level. Therefore, the only moral principles that are valid are the ones you believe in, and basically all principles are equally valid. The quandary with this view is how can a society or individual judge the behaviour of another if all socially accepted behaviours or personal moral principles are valid? The answer is that it can't. A relativist uses the notion of tolerance. The problem with tolerance argument is that we all have to be tolerance of people's opinions if they truly believe in them, making their opinion morally right. If a person truly believes in intolerance and that intolerant behaviour is acceptable then according to moral relativism it is morally right. According to the tolerance argument if a racist feels that be does not what to be tolerant of other races and goes around killing them off but truly feels that that he is doing is right then to a moral relativist we must be tolerant of opinion. The tolerance argument does not seem to be helping persuade a person towards moral relativism. However, Hugh LaFollette has the view that 'We should not merely tolerate diversity, we should embrace it; we should seek exposure to views different from our own; we should encourage variety of thought and action. Otherwise we will stagnate; we will fail to achieve our human potential.' He derives this thought following his reading of Mills 'On Liberty'.Moralities differ in each society, serving a functional purpose that is unique to the factors that comprise the area. The differences of all aspects of life are considered when morals are being produced. Society values are developed in order to ensure prosperity, stability and harmony; when the values are threatened, so is the good of the society. In order to maintain social balance, all members are forced to conform to these values. Those who choose to disobey societal maxims are banished or ostracized from the community. Social codes benefit the individual, too, they are not...

Other Essays On What Are The Main Moral Quandaries In Relation To Moral Relativism? Especially Given Increasing Globalisation, Is Moral Relativism A Suitable Solution To Moral Conflicts Between Cultures?

Does a strict adherence to moral laws serve a just outcome in Billy Budd - Literature - Essay

927 words - 4 pages battles at the Nile and Trafalgar. Since the mutineers have this option, it is just to let Billy have this chance as well. However, Captain Vere does not give Billy this chance. Vere feared that if he gave Billy this chance it would disrupt the naval tradition and influence a real mutiny to occur as he says, “The people have native sense; most of them are familiar with out naval usage and tradition: and how would they take it?”(Melville 99). In

Kant's Moral Theory And Liberalism: A Comparison

775 words - 4 pages government. Universalism is a principle that is based on treating people universally. It establishes universal moral principles that are applicable to all human beings no matter what their particular historical, social or cultural differences. Equality is related to universalism. It is the principle for all humans to have an equal moral standard. This does not pertain to equality in distribution of goods. Reform states that society is to be improved

The Christian Moral Ethics Of President Bush

2352 words - 10 pages shift.Being as I am a republican I have always supported the Bush Administration on important issues. I began researching the Christian moral ethics of our president and how he is putting them to use. Although I share many of the same views, I disagree with President Bush on several issues that he bases on his ethics. I also question his motives. I believe that he is doing what he feels is right; however I do feel that some things should be

Exploring the Dark Side- Moral ambiguity in Bates Motel

474 words - 2 pages Natasha BarraganEnglish 110Professor CarlanderOctober 9, 2014The Bates motelAdmit it, at some point or another in your life you have wished you could just kill someone. We all do. We continuously wonder what it would be like to act on these impulses. When some causes us harm or commits a heinous crime that is hard to endure, we wish we could take justice into our own hands. Nonetheless, we live in a society that punishes the individual that

Evaluate the view that Utilitarianism continues to offer a useful way of resolving moral dilemmas - St ambrose college, 6fr - Essay

1523 words - 7 pages value everyone’s pleasure the same. This is a significant factor in moral decision making as we are more likely to sacrifice the unknown majority’s pleasure for your own or for friends and family. Similarly, the calculus is too extensive and complicated to be implemented into a busy life as it takes too long to make a decision following the seven criteria. Although Bentham created utilitarianism, he formed a platform for other scholars to develop

Potential Ethical, Moral, Or Legal Issues

603 words - 3 pages cancer and AIDS patients. Marijuana is used to alleviate a lot of medical ailments such as nausea in cancer patients from chemotherapy, loss of appetite due to diseases such as HIV/AIDS; helps relax muscle tension and spasms, and chronic pain (Jacques & Luling, 2013). Medicinal use of marijuana would be ethical and moral because it is beneficial to one's health. The main active chemical in marijuana is delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol, more commonly

Explanation Of Moral Panic, Examples From The Uk

878 words - 4 pages Cohen showed it is biased on key factors. Firstly a 'problem' is identified, this problem is then simplified due to the angle the media takes. A view is formed by the media and they portray or campaign an image of the problem; this in turn causes public outcry which escalates until the authorities are forced to respond; although this response, on occasion, has in itself been the instigator of another panic.This process can be seen within society

A Quick Story About The Relationship Of Sisters. Written For A Moral Assignment

568 words - 3 pages I was the sweetest two year old you'd ever met. I was nice, I never wined, and I hated dirt. I was even a baby model. I listened when I was told no and did what I was told. But like everyone else, I had my moments. I had recently turned two when we found out about Sarah.Of course we didn't know that she was a she back then. In fact, we thought she was a he. All the way up to her birth we were sure of it. Now we just don't know. My mom had to buy

Immanuel Kant's Moral Philsophy And The Place Of The Emprical In Ethics

1262 words - 6 pages door is opened to a revolutionary notion of human dignity. Kant had previously suggested moral laws to be the only things worthy of "respect". If one sees rational beings as legislators themselves, it is clear that the solemn respect given to moral laws is, in fact, due by everyone to everyone. This brings us to the crux of Kant's proposal for interaction between rational beings. Since moral laws have an intrinsic worth as ends (as creations of

Trauma Training, PTSD vs Moral Injury - Liberty University - Proposal

1569 words - 7 pages to what we do, and the theory and purpose is direly valuable to our work; however, Training World Inc. wants to make it clear that in the work of treating individuals with this disorder, we are determined there is a stopgap that hurts a large population of our clients. The subject is called Moral Injury as the proposal has stated to this point, and within, is further information supporting its relevance. This subject is currently being screened

moral ethics : kant vs korsgard - ualbany/college - essay

1692 words - 7 pages clearly defined. Kant did a good job of this by explaining that our actions reflect one or more maxims that we hold; remember maxims are basically self-imposed rules on how we should act or will act in any given situation. What Kant is saying is that when we want to figure out whether an act is right or wrong, we should look at our maxims and not at how much misery or happiness the action will likely produce but instead we should look at if our

Similar Papers

Moral Rationality Essay

371 words - 2 pages great for emergencies. But when a cellular phone is used while driving it puts someone's life in danger. I think there are many reasons why hand-held cellular phones should be banned while driving The first reason is distraction. Talking on the cellular phone while driving distracts the driver from the road and can be the cause of a deadly accident. It is very easy to get distracted from what or who is in front of your car and pay more attention

To What Extent Is Natural Law Useful In Making Moral Decisions. Barr Beacon School Essay

1509 words - 7 pages according to natural reason. However, Aquinas says that the purpose of human life is to do what God intended them to do which is to achieve perfection by seeking union with God. This is due to the fact that humans are made in the image of God and the supreme good is the development of this image. This idea of having a telos of achieving eudaimonia would help aiding moral decisions because if humans are striving for a life of fulfilment we would not

What Is Abortion, And Should Is It Moral?

1702 words - 7 pages much research and consideration, and though both arguments are very strong, the immorality of abortion has proven to have a stronger argument. There are many complications that may be induced by having an abortion. In women under twenty there is an two time greater risk of immediate complications, also one in twenty-four experience immediate complications. In addition to that there is a one hundred and fifty percent increased risk of

Explain 'natural Moral Law' Essay

710 words - 3 pages . Natural Moral Law isn't just simply a set of rules, but a way of living. It gives guidance on everyday questions on how to live and links them to the fundamental principles of life. It provides a complete system of moral living in step with what it is to be human.