Will Gun Ban Make The Society Safer? Fullerton College Esl Essay

1652 words - 7 pages

Will Gun Ban Make the Society Safer?
On the 36th anniversary of John Lennon’s death in 2016, a substantial size crowd had gathered at the Strawberry Fields memorial in Centre Park in New York City to pay tribute to this English singer and songwriter who co-founded the Beatles. John Lennon was shot and killed by a crazed fan on December 8th, 1980 with a handgun bought by the gunman legally in Honolulu. His widow, Yoko Ono, commemorated the anniversary and posted on her nearly 4 million followers social media with an image of a blood-stained glasses which above with a harrowing statistic shows the data over 1.2 million people have been killed by gun violence since the year her late husband was murdered. According to the article, “Guns in the US: The Statistics behind the violence” by BBC, states that there are about 300 million guns held by about a third of the population in the US, and its figures shows that in 2015, 13,286 people were killed, and 26,819 were injured in the US by firearms. Such a huge number of gun ownership and gun death in the US make people become suspicious of its necessity, and the gun problem has turned to be the most controversial issue over the past few years in the US. The biggest social security risks which related to firearms, such as high level of crime rates, legal gun violence, and the useless of gun defense are considered as main reasons of people who support a gun ban. However, will it really make American society safer if all guns are banned? People need to think about it: what will be changed after the ban? Here are some possibilities: crime rates might be raised more after the ban, violence won’t disappear even if legal guns are gone, and people will lose the chance to protect themselves from unpredictable danger. This proves that, rather than making the society safer, banning guns might increase the risk of dangerousness. Instead, people should be allowed to keep their guns because they need to be in control of their protection.   
One of the reasons that people are opposed to firearms is because most crimes are committed with firearms. According to the article, “Gun Violence in America: The 13 Key Questions (With 13 Concise Answers)” by Jonathan Stray, claims that America has the highest rate of gun ownership in the world, about 310 million guns are held by nearly 40% of American households, and there were 8,583 homicides by firearms out of the total number of 12,664 in 2011. Gun-ban supporters insist that it will help to decrease crime rates if all firearms are banned because of the fewer gun deals, the less possibility of obtaining guns by offenders. However, there is no guarantee to reduce crimes by prohibiting the circulation of guns. The result of a survey in the article “Sources of Guns to Dangerous People: What We Learn by Asking them” by Phillip Cook et al shows that around 40% of guns obtained by respondents are illegal, which usually get from social networks or personal connections, instead of purchase directly from gun stores. The gun ban will work for restricting all legal gun circulation, while it won’t be an obstacle for criminals because they always have ways to get weapons as long as the black market exist which usually smuggling or copying firearms. The Paris attack in 2015 told the bitter truth about the nonsense of gun control in France. France is the strictest country of gun control in Europe - nearly all kinds of firearms are prohibited with extremely narrow exceptions, which means it is almost impossible to get a gun for personal use. Nevertheless, it couldn’t stop criminals to commit crimes. According to “Paris massacre: At least 128 killed in gunfire and blasts, French officials say”, CNN reveals terrorists obtained some AK-47s, the automatic rifles which usually for military use for attacks. Such a strict gun control in France couldn’t save victims in the Paris attack. People should not expect too much to get protection from a gun ban because guns are just tools, only people kill people, and the result might be much different if French people could have guns to against the crime. It explains that a gun ban will not be the key solution to reduce crime rates of the society but keeping guns for protection.
Besides the threat of illegal guns, gun violence that caused by legal guns, especially mass shootings which troubles an overwhelming number of Americans today has been a critical issue in social security. According to “A Guide to Mass Shootings in America”, Mark Follman et al reports that over 80% mass shooters bought their guns legally between 1982 and 2012. After the Orlando shooting, the public’s attitude toward on legal guns ban “has jumped sharply after a gunman used a semi-automatic assault rifle to kill 49 people at a gay nightclub in Orlando”, describes by Christopher Ingraham in “After Orlando, More Americans Want to Ban Assault Weapons”. Assault weapons are becoming mass shooters’ choice to do attacks because of its lethality and legality in the US. Gun violence prevention advocates strongly appeal to the ban on assault weapons which are legal in most states, such as semi-automatic rifles, pistols, and shotguns. However, the fact is that the ban on legal guns won’t stop the violations. Criminals can turn to drugs, trucks, or even bombs to get their ways when they cannot obtain guns anymore. Gun ban will only reduce one of the capabilities of mass murders, but not a radical resolution for the violation. Moreover, the nightclub in Orlando is the “Gun-Free Zone” by state law, which does not allow people carrying and using guns. Killers keep picking gun-free zone because such a soft target is always a good choice for them to commit attacks effectively. The casualties of Orlando Shooting may not be so heavy if at least one person is allowed to hold a gun to fight back. From this, it won’t make any sense to prevent violations through banning all guns, but on the contrary, make people vulnerable and will threaten American society more. Thus, people need guns to against violence and need more chances for defense, instead of awaiting their doom when the society is changed to a big “gun-free zone” under a strict gun ban.
Gun ban could be considered a contrary of the right of Americans to bear arms for protection. According to the Second Amendment to the Constitution, “A well-regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed”. It emphasizes the right which has such high value of freedom of Americans shouldn’t be taken away. On April 29, 1992, the L.A. Riot began and caused a serious of lootings, arsons, and civil disturbances. In nearly a weeklong, most of the stores in Korea town were looted, 3,767 buildings were burnt, and an estimate of over 1 billion of a property is damaged. No one could help the store owners who were the biggest victims in the riot because even local police could not control the situation. They had to pick their guns up to protect themselves, their families, and their businesses from this abandoned town. What if guns are banned at that time? They would lose more and even die more. London riot is a good example to compare on if the right for citizens to bear arms is sufficient. In the London Riot in 2011, people were in shaking mood to the violence, and they didn’t have efficient weapons to fight back. The only thing that those residents could do is volunteering broom armies to clean their neighborhood because bearing arms are almost impossible for them to the law, and London police couldn’t response immediately as well. Broom armies became a symbol to London residents to against the violence, but the damage and the scare caused by the riot are irreparable. If they have the same right to have guns with Americans, the loss of the riot might be less, and the frequency of riots will be reduced as well. From this perspective, a gun ban will not be a clever choice for the society, and the right of Americans to fight back should be asserted.
Banning guns will not put people away from dangers, but make the society more in turmoil. It doesn’t mean that holding guns can keep avoiding all threats absolutely, but for sure it will enhance citizens’ defensive capability. It’s undeniable that gun violence is a tough problem in the US, but the problem is that people shouldn’t only focus on certain sensational stories to negate all using of guns. The existing gun laws in America might not perfect enough to prevent all dangers. However, nothing in this world is perfect to meet all demands. The laws could be improved constantly, but applying the ban is a loss of hope. To sum up, guns should be allowed to strengthen defense and security, and people need to confront the benefit of gun ownership which provides more protection than violence.
Works Cited
Cook, P J, et al. “Sources of Guns to Dangerous People: What We Learn by Asking Them.” Preventive Medicine., U.S. National Library of Medicine, Oct. 2015, www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25937592. Accessed 17 May 2017.
Follman, Mark, et al. “A Guide to Mass Shootings in America.” Mother Jones, Steven Katz, 19 Apr. 2017, www.motherjones.com/politics/2012/07/mass-shootings-map. Accessed 17 May 2017.
“Guns in the US: The Statistics behind the Violence.” BBC News, BBC, 5 Jan. 2016, www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-34996604. Accessed 11 May 2017.
Ingraham, Christopher. “After Orlando, More Americans Want to Ban Assault Weapons.” Chicagotribune.com, Bruce Dold, 15 June 2016, www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/commentary/ct-orlando-shooting-assault-weapons-ban-20160615-story.html. Accessed 11 May 2017.
Stray, Jonathan. “Gun Violence in America: The 13 Key Questions (With 13 Concise Answers).” The Atlantic, Atlantic Media Company, 4 Feb. 2013, www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2013/02/gun-violence-in-america-the-13-key-questions-with-13-concise-answers/272727/#howmuchviolence. Accessed 11 May 2017.

RELATED

Why stricter gun control laws create a safer society - English 2201 - Research Essay

1479 words - 6 pages Americans think guns make them safer. (McCarthy, 2014). Think about what would happen in a movie theater if 10 people pull out guns to "stop the shooter" while 100 people are scrambling. More guns will only lead to more people being injured or dying, even if the intruder is eventually stopped. Police using weapons to stop criminals is different, but civilians have no necessity to openly carry a firearm. Having a gun for self defense will harm much

What are the impact and change cryptocurrency will make in the world - Scotch College - Essay

744 words - 3 pages What is the impact and change cryptocurrency will make in the world? What is cryptocurrency? Cryptocurrency is related to the internet and it uses cryptography. It is money but it is in a digital form. Cryptocurrency has been designed to be very secure and safe. Cryptocurrency has different kinds of impact which can be positive or negative to us. This digital money can make big changes around the world. Cryptocurrencies has been really popular

Influences from Thoreau in Into the Wild - Fullerton college ENG 100 - Essay

1507 words - 7 pages Free pay was not much. He even intended to return to the job once he was one with his Alaska Adventure (Krakauer 66). Many believed that with McCandless education, he would not be working in an elevator grain. The idea is that even though a college degree is a good thing to have, it does not mean that one will enjoy the job they will receive from it. McCandless willingness of wanting to come back to his elevator grain job means that he loves the job

Society Benefits From Gun Control - English - Essay

1592 words - 7 pages of Justice (NIJ), "recreation and personal use is the most common reason for owning a firearm" (“Gun Control”). Shooting a gun is something a family can do together and this time spent with each other will help build relationships. With proper supervision anyone can be taught gun safety and how to properly use a gun. Learning this information increases personal responsibility and builds self-confidence. These are two areas in society today that

Birth control should be provided for free by the government - De Anza College / ESL 273 - Essay

734 words - 3 pages ready to raise their children are significant benefits of birth control. Therefore, I believe that the government should provide contraception for free. This will make our life become better because we can focus on other problems in our country without caring much about health and educational issues of our female citizens and our children.

An essay about need for gun control and what needs to be done to keep schools safer - English - Essay

1384 words - 6 pages Rocio Zuniga Zuniga 1 Prof. McKenneon English 100 M,W Spring 2018 4 April 2018 Music is Everywhere, But Is It Really for Everyone ? Music is what makes the world go round; it is everywhere and for everyone. Music has been one of the biggest influences in the world. It is more than just a sound put together; music is a message, which raises the big question. Is freedom of expression in music negatively impacting our society? Freedom of speech is

Increased Gun control will decrease mass shootings - Writing and Rhetoric 101 - Argumentative Essay

1759 words - 8 pages society which often usurps individual rights (Ropeik, 2012). These beliefs are common among those who, when placed within the theory of cultural cognition, are individualists who believe that society should allow people to make more of their own decisions by granting them independence and personal freedoms such as the right to own firearms (Ropeik, 2012). In short, many opponents of gun control see their right to possess firearms as a symbol of

Should ethnic studies be required in high school? - Reedley College ESL - Essay

1000 words - 4 pages culture and history of different ethnic groups and, they also learn to show empathy and reduce prejudices. Torres 3 Finally, another benefit of ethnic studies program is that it empowers students. For example, ethnic study programs may include different ethnic groups, such as African-American studies, Chicano studies, indigenous studies, or Asian-American studies. This will help to recognize the importance of these groups in society, and the potential

Gun Control Argumentative Essay - Arrapahoe Community College - Argumentative

941 words - 4 pages countless casualties on both sides of the spectrum. Why would hardened criminals stop there? They wouldn’t! The average cost to make an unregistered AR-15 is $630. An unregistered gun is a gun that doesn’t have a serial number. Which means that it can be traced back to the shooter or owner. Let’s be honest, a smart criminal wouldn’t buy or use a registered gun. So even if there was a total ban of guns, real killers wouldn’t stop. What if one of

Film Analysis: The Lure and Female Power - Cal State Fullerton - Essay

1772 words - 8 pages slams the door, the music stops leaving an ambiguity of what will happen to the character in the trunk. A new non-diegetic sound is introduced into the sequence, the jumpy opening of Danse Macabre which finally ends the suspense of what will happen to the character. With a long take, the car begins to drive further and further away then cuts to a spatial edit of the trees passing. The high key lighting shot of the trees contrasts with the dark

How will artificial intelligence affect society - Jerome High School/English101 - Essay

1482 words - 6 pages AI is when technology will be at its peak. Machine learning will be enhanced and AI will teach humans and help them learn just as technology has been doing so far. As a matter of fact, programs based on AI already exist and help out with mathematics,writing, and other subjects. In the end, it would only make sense to allow AI to teach as it is designed to be smarter than humans. Society is slowly heading towards the age of AI. No one knows

trademark is a common problems between companies. wherefore Asda will be taken to the high court because of the claiming which Specsavers make it against it.

572 words - 3 pages Untitled summary trademark is a common problems between companies. wherefore Asda will be taken to the high court because of the claiming which Specsavers make it against it. The problem start when Azda ran an online and in-store advertisement claiming: "Be a real specs saver at Asda." Which considered by Specsavers as distortion of the company's reputation. The other object was the elliptical shapes which Azda use it

Argumentative Essay about Gun Control - Santa Ana College/ English 101 - Essay

725 words - 3 pages Free in America. Nowadays, it becomes very important for our government to better protect its own citizens rather than protect against foreign invaders by adopting effective gun control restrictions. To argue against gun control, gun supporters often bring the reason that if we restrict guns to law-abiding citizens, then only criminals will have weapons to kill people and good people will not be able to defend themselves. Studies and statistics done

Fight Club: Explosion, Gun, and Anarchy - Consumes River College EngWr 300 - Essay

1240 words - 5 pages participation in fight club show his desire to kill his old self and embrace his masculinity. Another thing the gun represent is power and control because in the real world, those with the most fire power will win and they will make the rules. This can be seen in the end scene, where the narrator had a gun in his mouth, and the narrator decided to pull the trigger. It is here that the narrator finally hit rock bottom and was able to have some control. Only

Food Sustainability in Today's Society - College/Nutrition Class - Essay

1514 words - 7 pages . This caught me off guard since most sandwiches will never contain sugar, but with all of the processing that is undergone with McDonald’s foods, it is understandable. It is safe to assume that these sugars in particular are added. In all, there are many possible changes I could make to improve these specific areas of my diet. If I want to improve my sodium intake, my advice to myself is to steer clear of processed foods such as mcchickens and