Hard Determinism: True Or False Philosophy Philosophy 101 Essay

1377 words - 6 pages

Hard Determinism True or False
Tauntay Williams
Professor Vecchio
Philosophy 101
December 13,2018
Williams 1
There are many viewpoints when it come to the topic of whether we are free
when making decisions or taking a course of action. The topic to free will and hard
determinism is an extremely complicated argument. Some say that we have free will
because we control our actions; we are able to make our own decisions. Others believe
that our actions are predetermined by factors outside of our control; we do not have the
ability to decide for ourselves. Many philosophers have made strong and sound
arguments for each stance however, in this essay I examine the question of free will. I
attempt to show through a hard deterministic view that free will is merely an illusion. I,
then,attempt to show the implications hard determinism has on morals.
Hard Determinism is a philosophical position that consist of three main claims: 1
determinism is true, 2 free will is an illusion, 3 freewill and determinism are
incompatible.​Incompatibilism is the view that if determinism is true no one can act freely
(Vaughn 221). A humans every action is completely determined by preceding events
and the law of nature. All events, including our actions and choices, are created
unappeasable by previous events, which are caused by earlier events, which are
caused by even earlier events and so on; the chain of causes continue back into an
indefinite past. Deterministic typically refer to scientific research in many fields, from
astrophysics to zoology to prove that determinism is in fact true. Through the
discoveries of the human behavior and how it is molded a great deal by heredity, the
brain's biochemistry, evolution and behavioral conditioning, the thought of human
Williams 2
choices and actions being predetermined by past event and the laws of nature are
reinforced. Since a humans behaviour and actions are determined by previous event
and the law of nature, they do not have genuine free will or moral responsibility.
Hard determinism states that determinism and free will are incompatible. . Peter
Van Inwagen states in An Essay on Free Will, “if determinism is true, then our acts are
the consequences of the laws of nature and events in the remote past. But is is not up
to us what went on before we were born, and neither is it up to us what the laws of
nature are. Therefore the consequences of these things (including our present acts) are
not up to us” (Vaughn 245). Give the truth of determinism and give the truth of
incompatibilism, free will is false by default.
Simple everyday human choices and actions may seem to be completely free,
however they are actually determined. Purchasing water is typically a free action
because one can simply chose to purchasing juice instead; there is nothing preventing
them from purchasing juice or forcing them to purchase water. However free those
decisions may seem, they are actually not. The decisions a person makes are the direct
results...

Other Essays On hard determinism: true or false - philosophy philosophy 101 - essay

Examine the main concepts of Hard Determinism - School - Essay

1292 words - 6 pages Examine the main concepts of Hard Determinism Hard Determinism can be defined by Baruch Spinoza’s quote: ‘In the mind there is no absolute or free will; but the mind is determined to will this or that by a cause, which has been determined by another cause…and so on to infinity’. This basically means that humans do not have free will, and that all moral actions have prior causes. Hard Determinism follows the Principle of Causality, which states

Wittgenstein’s Language Concept - pccc and philosophy - essay

951 words - 4 pages Belle 2 Glennisann Belle Professor John Fruncillo Philosophy 101 October 12th, 2018. Wittgenstein’s Language Concept Ludwig Wittgenstein was born April 26th, 1889 in Vienna, Austria-Hungary. He was regarded by many as the greatest philosopher of the 20th century. Wittgenstein’s works were very instrumental in the twenty-century philosophy of language. He made a significant contribution to conversations on language, logic, and metaphysics and

Descartes' Impact on Philosophy - PHI101 - Essay

489 words - 2 pages Andrew Huang Examined Life Professor Gedney Descartes’ Argument for the existence of God Rene Descartes, known as the father of modern philosophy, was a French thinker who used doubt as a basis for much of his philosophy. To start, he wondered what would actually give him any reason to doubt all of his beliefs. From this, Descartes concluded that an evil demon was tricking him into thinking that all of his beliefs were true when they were not

Theory of Knowledge with Phrenology - Philosophy - Essay

1234 words - 5 pages principal Clifford proposes, since evidence itself is something that doesn’t clearly have a right or wrong. This points to a large oversight in the Ethics of Belief, begging the question: If evidence can be fluid and manipulated, does it give a belief any more validity than a belief without any supporting evidence? These caveats, as outlined by Clifford, are addressed in the philosophy constructing the Ethics of Belief. For evidence to be sufficient

Who is Socrates? An essay on his philosophy - Philosophy BC - Essay

2005 words - 9 pages of it. He does not like the sophist because they seem to be more interested in rhetoric than true philosophy and give elaborate and embellished answers. His association with sophists is also a harming factor in the verdict of his trial in the Apology. Anytus accuses Socrates and the mainly the sophists of corrupting the youth. During this time that accusation was not taken lightly by the traditional Greek citizens. Socrates tried to distinguish

Rene Descartes Philosophy Paper - UBC phil 100 - Essay

800 words - 4 pages everything first including what is commonly believed to be God’s creation. He put the first term of knowledge by supporting that all his thoughts are mistaken and that there is absolutely nothing in the world because we use our senses which are commonly known to deceive us. He analyzed everything thoroughly and found the proposition of I am I exist can only be true if t is put forward by me or conceived in my mind (Descartes, 2013). Descartes

virtue ethics in jouralism question - philosophy, university of warwick - essay

1876 words - 8 pages , 2007:517). The central role in virtue ethics in classical moral philosophy is practical reasoning. It claims that I am not virtuous if I have not thought through and understood for myself the reasons on which I act. However, if virtue has to be a disposition that did no good to me and the others, one would not be motivated to have it. Hence, a disposition is useful to me or to others in general (Annas, 2007:527). Virtue we get by exercising

The significance of death in heidegger’s philosophy - Phylosophy - essay

521 words - 3 pages The significance of death in heidegger’s philosophy Throughout history the idea of death and its significance has always been a major issue. One that a great number philosophers have pondered over. Many have said that death has no significance or subjective meaning. However there are some who have had distinctive ideas about death and its significance. Plato, a Greek philosopher and the founder of the first institute of higher learning in the

Simone Weil's creation of the concept decreation - Philosophy - Essay

1687 words - 7 pages Colt Dante 28 February 2018 Philosophy 218 Simone Weil’s Decreation Even after reading Little’s essay several times, it is still difficult to fully grasp Simone Weil’s term of decreation. This idea directly sheds much light onto all of humanity in terms of how people should be or not be. It is supposedly the only way that people should exist if they want to experience what it means to be truly happy. Even Little says that for Simone Weil, it

Philosophy Is the Good Life an Ethical Life? - PHI2010 - essay

635 words - 3 pages Carson Garbrecht Intro to Philosophy Professor Koegler October 7, 2018 Is the Good Life an Ethical Life? Essentially, the primary objective of a philosophical ethic lies in its attempt to explain the justification of rationality within the context of the individualistic internal struggle, as well as how that molds our perception of right and wrong. This perception is then applied to a universal concept of truth that is unique to society. The

Moore's Proof of an External Reality - Philosophy - Essay

594 words - 3 pages condition is true for the argument because even if the premises were false, the conclusion could be true, proving that the premises and the conclusion are not the same. For example, if Moore had held up an amputated hand instead, the premise would be false, but the conclusion would still be true. The second condition—possibly the most controversial condition—is still fulfilled by Moore’s argument because he states that he definitely can know he is

Similar Papers

Essay On Free Will Vs. Hard Determinism (Philosophy) Introduction To Philosophy/Bellarmine University Essay

815 words - 4 pages the laws of nature. hard determinism rejects ethics. The belief is that to hold someone moral or immoral it would require the belief that that person has to choose between two or more alternative possibilities. If this idea of morals is true and there is no free will, then it is impossible to portray someone as moral or immoral, according to hard determinist theorists. However, hard determinist theorists also acknowledge that humans can in some

Philosophical Analysis Of "Being John Malkovich" Mcc Philosophy 101 Essay

808 words - 4 pages Descartes Theorized “...the mind or soul of man is entirely different from the body…” (Rene Descartes, Meditations of First Philosophy) This begs the question, what does it mean to be someone else? And did Schwartz ever actually achieve becoming John Malkovich? I don't believe that Schwartz ever became Malkovich. I also do not think that Schwartz ever wanted to become Malkovich in the first place, after taking control of Malkovich’s body he simply

Locke V Hume On Philosophy Of Personal Identity Phil 101 Essay

706 words - 3 pages Juan Orozco Prof. Koobatian PHIL 101-1864 9 February 2019 LOCKE v HUME John Locke claims that personal identity exists over time, that is to say that we are the same person we were five years prior and will continue to be that person in the coming future. His claim is proven, through his own justification, due to our ability to form and hold memories. David Hume holds a completely opposite view than Locke’s when it comes to the idea of a self or

Philosophy Three Major Theories Philosophy Essay

707 words - 3 pages you to delegate to others who have those abilities, in order to achieve the common goal. Rather than clinging to the false belief that they can do it all, great leaders hire people who complement, rather than supplement, their skills. Working on your areas of weaknesses will improve your leadership ability – and recognizing them makes you more human” (“What Makes an Effective Leader”). The worst thing for a leader is to get egotistic about his or