Why Was There A Civil War In Russia In 1918?

516 words - 3 pages

The czech army consisted of prisoners and deserters from the Austria-Hungarian empire from the provinces of Bohemia and Slovakia. The Tsar gave his consent to set up a national force which they became to fight against Austria-hungary in the summer of 1916 with their leader called Tomas Masaryk. When Masaryk noticed that Lenin was making peace with the central forces, and lenin refused to let them fight against the western forces, he decided to move the czech to France to rejoin the fighting. In may 1918, a group of the czech soldiers were falsely accused1 of killing a man in chelyabinsk and one soldier was shot for throwing "something"2 at the train. The remainder went straight into ...view middle of the document...

Those opposed the bolsheviks included the social revolutionaries, although they were separated in 1917 it was the monirity that supported the bolsheviks and the rest were angered at the fact that Lenin had allowed the elections for a constituent assembly which the social revolutionaries won most of the seats, and then cancelled it and had any opposition killed. Others, were factory owners who didn't want the factories to be nationalised, the orthodox church who were against the atheist beliefs of the communist party and also the bourgeois who did not want to lose their lands as the bolsheviks had given most of it away in the treaty of Brest-Litovsk. These people all wanted the bolsheviks out of power though for personal reasons but were quite determined.There was also inernational opposition, Japan wanted simply the massurian lakes. While Britain, America and France allied and supplied the whites with soldiers,arms and money. Their reason was that they were upset by the fact that Russia pulled out of the war when they needed them there as their leaving allowed Germany to concentrate fully on the western front. Also, the west were capitalist and were seriously against communism and its ideas and the Bolsheviks being communists were a threat to their way of life.All these people had self beneficial reasons why they were all against the bolsheviks,which made rising up against the party quite easy,especially in the case of the workers whom were at first in supoort of the bolshevik party.

Other Essays On WHY WAS THERE A CIVIL WAR IN RUSSIA IN 1918?

First world war key turning point in civil rights in the US? - History - Essay

899 words - 4 pages How far can the first world war be regarded as the key turning point in the changing geography of civil rights issues in the USA in the period 1850-2009? I agree that the first world war was a key turning point in the changing Geography of civil rights issues. Throughout the period 1850-2009, there was a significant change in the Black American demographic. Around 1850, many Black Americans lived as slaves in the Southern States of America. In

Should Civil Disobedience Be Permitted In A Democracy?

572 words - 3 pages unlimited power by the government could be worse. Therefore there is no reason why civil disobedience souldnt' be permittied in a democracy.It gave woman the right to vote. Nellie Mclung was a courageous woman that used civil disobedience in order to allow women the right to vote. In 1918 women were granted the right to vote. Civil disobedience allowed this to happen. It has had positive effects on society, and positive effects on social reforms

Was The Fear Of The Japanese Aggression In South-East Asia In World War 2 Justified?

1910 words - 8 pages the European war was using up all their resources. Australia had most of its soldiers in the Middle East, they had lost Britain as a protector and it made them feel very vulnerable. When Singapore fell to the Japanese on February 15, 1942, Australia realised it was alone and defenceless. There was a great fear that Japan was close to invading Australia as its empire was growing. Australian reactions at the time were embodied in an article

Why Did The Cold War Break Out In The Aftermath Of World War II?

2116 words - 9 pages United States demobilised, and if Poland succumbed to Communist reign "" which all seemed highly possible in February 1945 - then there would be nothing to stop the Russians from over-running all Europe. Neither the East nor the West was prepared, previously or following World War II, to allow Eastern Europe to become a strong, independent, or neutral land.The 1939 Nazi-Soviet Pact had provided for a division of Eastern Europe between Russia and

Terrorism in Syria - syrian civil war -2018 - St Johns University - History

1807 words - 8 pages Terrorism in Syria Marcus Poree April 24th, 2018 Professor Romano History 1000C There is countless problems in Syria involving the Syrian civil war, and a big part of the problem is innocent civilians being murdered by the hand of “terrorist”. I quote terrorist because the idea of terrorism can be pretty subjective depending on which side you’re representing. The US views groups like Al Qaeda and ISIS as terrorist, however some Middle Eastern

A mobilized war in World War one - HST 101 - Essay

1242 words - 5 pages White 1 Mackenzie White HST 101 12:00 Tue,Thurs 4/10/18 Prompt A A mobilized war The First World War from 1914 to 1918, also known as the Great war was considered to be the first total war in history. What began as a dispute over the equality of power between the alliance of France, Britain and Russia and on the other side the central powers of Germany and Austria-Hungary. It soon became a global conflict in Europe as well as their own

Questioning America's Role in the Syrian Civil War - Rowan College Comp II - Rebuttal

1461 words - 6 pages catastrophic event, Long must understand that there should always be room for adjustments especially during a time where an influx of displaced individuals want to set foot in the country. According to President Trump (2017), “more than 300 persons who entered the United States as refugees are currently the subjects of counterterrorism investigations by the Federal Bureau of Investigation.” Thus the Trump administration views it to be vindicated to

How stable was Russia from 1905 to 1914 - A level History - Essay

529 words - 3 pages Mohamedamiin Sharif 12S How stable was Russia in the period from the October Manifesto (1905) to the outbreak of war (1914) From the introduction of the October Manifesto in 1906 to the outbreak of war in 1914,the tsar’s position and Russia as a whole was stable to a large extent.However, there were a few occasions where instability rose, and whether Russia was stable or on the brink of a revolution will all be explored in this essay. One

Social Developments in the USSR, 1918-85 - St Albans / Lower 6th - Essay

1134 words - 5 pages majority of Khrushchev’s policies stemmed from his practical nature; and so, in 1958 he introduced vocational training into all schools, and university students had to undertake practical economic work. Throughout Khrushchev’s term education was made compulsory for 7 to 15 year olds in the 1959 Education Law, and schools then reformed again to allow students to study till the age of 19. For 16 to 19 year olds there was a mix of academic and

Henry VII was successful in dealing with - N/A - Essay

1742 words - 7 pages wars, the severity of the Warbeck rebellion was enhanced, which proves Henry VII’s ability to handle them with success. In terms of Henry VII’s financial management, there was a lack of money at the start of his reign due to the poor finances of the Crown, which had been depleted by wars at home and abroad in the past reigns. Henry VII avoided war at all cost and ensured that the Crown had built up enough annual income to meet its commitments. The

Was the Civil War More About Morality or Military? - HST - Argumentative paper

2051 words - 9 pages win the Civil War, and that sentiment of independence lived on past Appomattox. Boasting countless farms and lush agricultural potential, the South was self-sustaining when it came to food. Cut off from Northern factories and armories, these facilities were created in the South to sustain the war effort. Confederate officers were also highly trained and well respected nationwide, leading to victories at Fort Sumter and Bull Run. A different

Similar Papers

To What Extent Was There A "New Consciousness Of Self" In The Twelfth Century?

2465 words - 10 pages Although it is universally recognised that there was a sixteenth century renaissance, a body of historians now argue that there were in fact three renaissances in Western Europe. These two earlier renaissances took place in the seventh and twelfth centuries, and in the latter some argue that we see an emergence of man coming to terms with his 'self' or his 'individuality.'It is important here to define what we are looking for in this essay

Nationalist Victory In The Spanish Civil War History Essay

4434 words - 18 pages are fighters. Franco is not.”[footnoteRef:29] Given (unusually) that these are not public boastings on behalf of Mussolini or Hitler to attempt to show off their own strengths, these comments would tend to demonstrate a genuine lack of faith in Franco’s ability to win the War for the Nationalists. Early in the conflict there was a consensus in the foreign press that the Civil War would be over before the start of 1937.[footnoteRef:30] There did

Great Britain?S Involvement In The Civil War

1184 words - 5 pages be.There were other factors that motivated British interest in the American Civil War besides politics. More than any other consideration, economic concerns influenced British policy towards the war. This helped influence the English opinion against the Union. One of these acts was the Unions use of the blockade. On April 27, 1861, President Lincoln formally notified Great Britain and the rest of the world that all ports were under a naval

La Higuera The Spanish Civil War In Literature

3452 words - 14 pages Erinnerungen umgewandelt werden. Jede Gesellschaft hat allerdings andere kulturelle Erinnerungen. Die Festlegung was als relevant für eine Gesellschaft gilt, wird von Instanzen, wie der Politik, der Kirche oder den Medien entschieden, indem sie bestimmte Erinnerungen in den Vordergrund rücken.Lange war das "Interesse an der Vergangenheit kein "historisches", sondern ein zugleich umfassendes und konkretes Interesse an Legitimation