This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Jury Of Her Peers Essay

410 words - 2 pages

A Jury of Her Peers deals with the circumstances surrounding the death of a farmer, John Wright, who is found strangled in his bed. His wife is arrested for the murder with the story beginning the following day as the sheriff, the county attorney, the sheriff's wife, and a neighbor couple return to the Wrights' house. The women are there to pick out some clothes for the wife to wear while in prison and the men to investigate the crime scene.The story subsequently focuses on the two women of the group, Mrs. Peters and Mrs. ...view middle of the document...

This view from the outside continues to carry over to the interior as the women make their way through the old house gaining insight into the life of Minnie Wright.Dirty towels and pans, baking supplies left out, erratic stitching in a piece of quilting, and an empty bird cage with its door handle broken lead Mrs. Hale and Mrs. Peters to believe Minnie Wright must have been in a poor state. Mrs. Hale recalls Minnie Foster's vitality and how she enjoyed singing before her marriage to John Wright, who appeared to be a hard and stingy man. There seemed to be no evidence of the old Minnie Foster in the old dreary house. Ragged cupboards, a broken stove, shabby clothes and dingy old furniture in the cold colorless house further influences the womens opinion that Minnie Wright must have endured a hard, isolated and lonely life.When the women find a dead canary wrapped in silk in a music box, seemingly the only source of pleasure Minnie Wright had had in her life, they know what has happened and why. Out of a sense of understanding and sympathy the two women wordlessly concede to hide the damaging evidence from their husbands. In essence, saving Minnie Wright from assured prosecution and conviction in her husbands death.

Other Essays On Jury Of Her Peers

Sheppard v. Maxwell, Warden. 3S4 U.S. 333, S6 S.Ct. 1507, 16 L.Ed.2d 600 (1966)

445 words - 2 pages counsel to be heard. Sheppard was found guilty and his appeals to the state courts of appeal, as well as the Supreme Court, were denied. In 1965, Sheppard hired F. Lee Bailey, who decided to institute a writ of habeas corpus.Question: Was Sheppard denied due process of law by the editorials published by the Cleveland newspapers and the unsequestered jury of the Cleveland courts?Held: Yes, Sheppard was denied due process of law by the editorials

Film Review Of "To Kill A Mockingbird"

535 words - 3 pages Racial discrimination is a major theme within the film "To Kill a Mockingbird" when Tom Robinson, a man of African heritage, is falsely accused of raping a young white girl. His attorney, a white man named Atticus Finch, gives solid evidence in Tom's favour, but the jury still finds Tom guilty and he is sent to prison. I believe that this famous film adapted from an even more famous book effectively communicates its message with an entertaining

The Magna Carta By: Tyler Giacopelli

391 words - 2 pages Magna Carta also said that all free men can get a fair trial with a jury of their peers. In addition, the Magna Carta gave nobles some say in the government. Over the course of fifty years, this grew into the idea of parliament. Parliament is a group of advisers to the English king. The other way the Magna Carta affected the monarchs rule was by making them more powerful. The Magna Carta made the monarchs more powerful by giving the nobles some

Characteristics Of Common Law

1237 words - 5 pages ).5. A man can only be charged and convicted with a crime known to law. (sec. 9 of the C.C. - exception is the charge of contempt of court).6. A man can only be punished after conviction, and then only within the limits authorized by law. (C.C. sec. 6).7. A man is entitled to be tried by his peers. In Canadian law, this is only true for certain indictable offences for which the C.C. so provides.8. The accused must be given the benefit of a

12 Angry Men - Critical Thinkers

1460 words - 6 pages characteristics are ones that cloudthe mind and do not allow common sense or critical thinking to come into play.There were three individuals that held so much grudhe, anger and aggression that itprevented them from thinking critically. One of these peers was juror 3. He claimed thatthe defendant was certainly guilty and his reasons for thinking this was completelyprejudice. He brought thoughts of anger, resentment and revenge into the jury because

Ancient Greece - what did they ever do for you?

498 words - 2 pages told to explain things people couldn't. They were all about the gods and goddesses. Thunder would strike when Zeus was mad, and winter came because Demeter was mad that her daughter was gone. These taught people why things happened so no one would wonder.6) Philosophy was a great thought of theory. Great philosophers would think about life and why we exist. Great philosophers such as Aristotle, who taught Alexander the Great, and Homer, have

Case Brief

538 words - 3 pages . He left the bar alone and walked home, 10 minutes later she arrived at their shared residence and told him that he had one week to find another place to live. He consented and went upstairs to change. She followed him and proceeded to attempt to choke him. He punched her in the face in order to force her to release him. She then told him that he needed to leave that night. He said he was tired of her antics, but proceeded to get re dressed and

"To Kill A Mocking Bird" By Harper Lee

1703 words - 7 pages way his father is. Just because the Cunninghams are poor, Scout believes that Walter is not equal to her or her family. She does not understand that what she said is a form of prejudice. She only stops because Calpurnia makes her. After the trial Scout is informed that women are discriminated due to their gender. "For one thing, Miss Maudie can't serve on a jury because she's a woman -" "You mean women in Alabama can't -?"(224) Scout had never

The Scarlet Letter And The Crucible Characterization Essay

392 words - 2 pages , a motivation which helps them execute their dastardly plans: Revenge. Abigail is consummated by damning Elizabeth Proctor. With her out of the way, she thinks she can regain John Proctor's lust and affection, thereby unifying them emotionally. She chooses to portray herself as an innocent bystander of a supposed act of witchcraft. The same can be said about Chillingworth. He makes himself out to be as someone who seeks to help Dimmesdale, when

Term Paper For Into To Criminal Justice

1804 words - 8 pages the one to stand up and say that the boys had to be tried in groups of two or three, because the prosecutor thought that it may cause a reversible error. The cross examination of Victoria Price only lasted mere minutes, the examining doctors were not cross examined at all, Ruby Bates was not asked about contradictions between her statement and that of Victoria Price. The defense attorney only offered up the defendants as witnesses, six of the boys

To Kill A Mockingbird By John Grisham, Speaks Of Racism

1046 words - 5 pages battery. Atticus stated, "Tom Robinson was a dead man as soon as Mayella Ewell opened her mouth and screamed." (p266) He had no chance of an acquittal as no-one will hear the truth, on account of the dire racism that has been embedded into them.The jury, representing the "typical" kinsmen of the community, pronounced Tom guilty. All evidence pointed to Mr. Ewell as the offender, a man who spends his relief cheques on whiskey and lets his children

Similar Papers

Criminal Justice System Essay

1288 words - 6 pages jury of their peers. Now that phrase is open to a lot of interpretations. The dictionary defines peer as "one who is equal to another in rank, or merit or quality". Using that definition literally, what comes to mind is the potential makeup of a jury for a Fortune 500 CEO and that of your neighborhood dope dealer. Should the CEO have a jury composed of business leaders and chambers of commerce types while the dope dealer have twelve people from the

Ring V. Arizona Case Brief Essay

1533 words - 7 pages decide a case on his/her own. This leads to bias and the unconstitutionality of being tried in court, but without the jury making the key determinations that make up the "Trial by jury" aspect of the constitution.My Conclusion:In my opinion, the US Supreme Court did come to the correct decision. If the presiding judge, and that judge alone, is allowed to make these decisions which determine sentencing, I believe there could be an unreasonable

The Fifth Amendment Is An Old Friend And A Good Friend. Do You Agree Or Disagree With That Assessment Of The Fifth Amendment? Why?

471 words - 2 pages system towards those being tried.The Fifth Amendment basically states five of a somewhat related yet diverse nature. "No person shall be held to answer for a capita, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger." This basically means everyone has a right to be tried before a jury of

Compares Justice In Billy Budd, And Twelve Angry Men

639 words - 3 pages Changing VerdictsThe trials in both Billy Budd and Twelve Angry Men have a 'jury' of sorts, and in each story, the members of these juries are virtually unanimous in their decision, but one person remains who would vote against his/her fellow jurors. As it happens, both juries completely change the verdict from what it appeared each jury would have originally voted. I hope to show you the similarities/differences of these two stories by exposing