Criminal Justice & Community Justice
The issue that community policing faces is the purpose of the community policing is mistaken and is criticized. From their inception police forces have protected and served the wealthy. Group policing is utilized to support the authenticity of the police when they are undermined by dissent and crisis. Community policing can't take care of the issues that reason wrongdoing yet can just remove them briefly. Community policing is utilized as a reason to grow police funding and employing. Community policing widens police nearness and investigation into regular daily existence and transforms social issues into police issues. The historical significance of this issues is that many communities and people believe that the purpose of community policing doesn’t match up to what the police say. The impact this issue has created is a lack of trust within in the community and people in these communities showing that they cannot put their faith in the police.
Police occasionally center around working environment manhandle by supervisors or office wrongdoing by the well off. Rather they ensure business regions, and to a lesser degree, the property of the white-collar classes. Broken windows hypothesis has been broadly reprimanded since its inception. Researchers reproached the theory on observational grounds, over and again appearing there is no connection between broken windows policing and diminished wrongdoing rates and featuring how it unreasonably focuses on the relaxation propensities for regular workers groups and groups of shading, while at the same time leaving untouched the exercises of the wealthy in private or indoor setting. Thought that is might not be realistic to set objectives for the police and then to expect the police to established schemes to meet those objectives. Waddington (1984) stated that "The largely uncritical acceptance with which this notion has been welcomed is itself a danger. Any proposal, however attractive, should be subjected to careful and skeptical scrutiny." He further noted that since order could only be maintained by a community itself, the police alone cannot do it. Even though the cops require the agree of subjects to be worthwhile, in numerous examples that agreement isn't given. Also, the broken windows theory has been criticized problems such graffiti do not inevitably symbolize the same thing to everyone, and therefore do not necessarily have the effect imagined by Wilson and Kelling. Eck (1993) felt that group policing won't decrease the pressure between the police and people in general, however, "Best case scenario they will make police activities more satisfactory to the general population, regardless of whether due process is damaged." To conquer a portion of this, (Mastrofski and Greene ,1993) proposed that “The force for group collaboration must be supported more by the groups proceeding with sense of duty...