Compare And Contrast Machiavelli And Max Weber

2073 words - 9 pages

1Machiavelli and Weber: Comparing Political PhilosophiesMoses TeeUniversity of AlbertaNovember 7th 2013Philosophy is referred to as a set of beliefs, concepts and attitudes held by an individual or a group of people. It is the study of problems in general and the prescription of solutions to problems based on critical and systemic analyses and the employment of rational argument. Philosophy through the lens of Political Science does so as mentioned above in terms of the state, the governance of the state the ethics of an individual in possession of political power. Political philosophers focus on the issues relating to the state, such as political action that need or need not be taken and the general behavior of a given individual involved in politics. With the focus set on just the state, political action and violence, two philosophers have critically analyzed politics through the three concepts listed above: Niccolo Machiavelli and Max Weber. They each have their own views, opinions and suggestions that both have similarities and differences considering the cultural and temporal inconsistency between the both of them. The fact that some of their ideas intersect is fascinating.Niccolo Machiavelli, known as the founding father of modern Political Science, lived between 1469 and 1752 in Florence in what is known today as Italy. He is not only known for his work in politics and diplomacy, as he was also a well-versed historian. He employed the method of citing historic figures and events in his justification for the suggestions he made in his famous book: The Prince. In the book that was dedicated to Lorenzo Medici, Machiavelli raises many important aspects relating to the political environment, governance and ethics of an individual in possession of political power citing political actions that should and should not be taken, the state briefly and violence in governing which is studied by political philosophers today as there are many ancient concepts and practices mentioned in the text that can still be incorporated into modern political practices.Max Weber famously known as one of the three founders of modern Sociology, lived between 1864 and 1920 in Germany. Although he specialized in the field of Sociology, Weber did delve into the world of politics. His methods differ from that of Machiavelli as time progressed, so did society and the knowledge possessed by mankind. Instead of employing the method of historical analysis in his philosophy of politics, Weber utilizes Sociology in his analysis of the political realm. In his groundbreaking essay titled 'Politics as a Vocation', Weber explores the world of politics through political actions based on social implications; be it good or bad and weighing the benefits against cost. He goes on to mention the state and its rights of governance in which violence is also cited. This document is also of interest to those in the field of politics, as his definition of the state has become the general understanding of Western social thought.In this paper, I would argue that although their opinions on governance may be different on the outlook, they share a similarity, which can be detected through analyzing their philosophies carefully. This also means that they share differing views on the concepts of political action, the state and violence which will also be analyzed in this paper.Niccola MachiavelliIn his book, The Prince, Machiavelli focuses his attention on counseling and educating the prince, Lorenzo Medici in the treacherous world of politics. The book is considered in simple terms a manual to being the prince. As such, he elaborates on an array of ideas relating to politics. For the purpose of this paper, the content of his writing will be analyzed through the three concepts listed above. In terms of political action, Machiavelli writes about cruelty and violence and the proper use of the evil act of cruelty. He admits that cruelty can and should be used wisely once within a rule as he explains in his words "Injuries therefore, should be inflicted all at the same time, for the less they are tasted, the less they offend." (Cahn, 2011, p. 260). He then goes on to say that after that one infliction of injury, the prince should gradually distribute benefits in small quantities successively (Cahn, 2011, p. 260). Machiavelli raises a good point in his explanation above as when people are constantly subject to miseries, injuries and misfortune, they will eventually grow weary of it and revolt, however if the need for the use of cruelty arises and is applied in the prince's governance at one point of time, it is only felt once and can sometimes be forgiven through time. It is basic knowledge from daily observation that repetitive actions can be very irritating and that understanding can be applied in Machiavelli's justification for the use of cruelty. As for the distribution of benefits after the fact of cruelty, it works well as Machiavelli states that the subjects can fully savor the goodness of the benefits if they are given in small quantities successively. After being treated with cruelty, the gradual distribution of benefits would show the subjects that it can only get better from there on and would appease the subjects. This concept can be seen today in many forms of government, where benefits such as tax returns or any form of government assistance is always given in small amounts and in monthly or yearly intervals. This is where Machiavelli relates political action to violence. The state can also be related to Machiavelli's conception of political action. Through his writings, Machiavelli was seen as an individual who detested representative governments or republics and therefore refers to the state as the prince's possession which meant that the prince was the state. As such, the prince or the state was free to act in a way that it sees fit for the greater good of the state itself. Machiavelli's conception of the state suggests that he believes a different set of moral rules apply to the state and that it is unreasonable for the state to act just like a regular person would act.Max WeberIn his essay titled 'Politics as a Vocation', Max Weber explores the world of politics through the lens of Sociology. As Weber delves into the lecture, he begins by stating that politics exist exclusively in the realm of the State and between states. This leads Weber to defining state in his own words, "Today, however, we have to say that a state is a human community that (successfully) claims the monopoly of the legitimate use of physical force within a given territory." (Weber, 1919, p.1). Weber, Like Machiavelli, believed that the violence and cruelty could be incorporated into governance however with the explicit use of the term 'legitimate'. The idea of legitimate violence is ambiguous in a sense of what is considered legitimate violence? The ambiguity of the term has created a 'grey-zone' for which the definition of legitimate violence can be debated. However, gathering from his ideas and considering his position in the timeline of political philosophers, Weber's understanding of legitimate violence can be explained as violence that is state sanctioned to protect the majority of the people within a state. This means that the state can use violence to halt the advance of individuals who commit crimes that harm the state as a whole in which the greater good of the state is the reason for violence rather than personal gain. For example, in the recent 2010 Toronto G20 Summit riots, those who were involved in the rioting were subject to violence from the police (who are authorized by the state to act on its behalf) who arrested the rioters. The riot was a harmful act carried out by a group of citizens and by using violence, the police were able to curb the threat and return downtown Toronto to its regular daily life. Weber's definition of the state and his use of the term 'legitimate violence' satisfactorily connects the three concepts listed above.AnalysisComparing the ideas of Machiavelli and Weber, there are some notable similarities although the two philosophers lived in different points in history and also in different parts of Europe. There are also some clear differences in their view of politics which will be listed. Both Machiavelli and Weber condone to state sanctioned violence with the purpose of the greater good of the public, however their views on the degree of violence differ substantially. For Machiavelli, he believed that cruelty and violence should be used only once and it can vary in degrees depending on the circumstances. This means that Machiavelli condones to excessive use of violence in one single use. As for Weber, his idea of the legitimate use of violence would imply that the violence used would be used in a way that it is not excessive and used only to temporarily disable rather than harm permanently. Their views on the state are also quite similar and different at the same time. Machiavelli refers to the state as the prince's possession while Weber referred to the state as an entity that had the power to use legitimate violence. The similarity between the two ideas is the fact that they both agree the state has rights that regular citizens do not. The difference is that Machiavelli believed the prince was able to act freely (wisely) in any way he seen fit to achieve success. Weber on the other hand believed that violence should only be used against those who threaten the peace and security of the state rather than personal gain. Machiavelli's philosophy can be seen as a more realistic view of human nature and his suggestions are more appealing as they are more practical to individual gain. He is one of the few philosophers that acknowledges and condones to evil as many philosophers tend to write only on how men should live rather than how men actually live. Weber also has a sense of practicality in his views but is more downplayed and fair as violence or evil in his opinion was to be used to maintain peace and order within the state.After the analysis of the two philosophers, it can be concluded that although their views may seem very different, they are in a way similar. Their views on violence are both the same to a point and also different when they delve further into explaining more into the concept. Their conception of the state are also similar to a point until it was elaborated upon which clear differences could be seen. They both agreed violence could be used in governance however the degree and actual purpose differed when analyzed. In terms of their conception of the state, they both agreed that the state has rights that normal citizens were not in possession of to carry out violence. However, Machiavelli's definition of the state was the prince's possession while Weber's definition of the state is a government within a territory that is authorized to use legitimate physical violence. Weber's definition of the state is more relevant to the modern understanding of the state as it is the basis of understanding the relationship between the state and its people where the enforcement of law comes into play. Machiavelli's viewpoint was more individualistic and focuses more on the politician itself than the state and the greater good for the public. As Thomas Hobbes said, there is a difference between the transferring of power to an entity rather than an individual. Of course, Machiavelli did write The Prince well before Thomas Hobbes' time.ReferencesCahn, S. M. (2011). Political Philosophy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Weber, M. (1919). Politics as a Vocation. Retrieved fromhttp://www.sscnet.ucla.edu/polisci/ethos/Weber-vocation.pdf.

RELATED

Machiavelli and Lao-Tzu Compare and contrast leadership - Delgado community college - Essay

708 words - 3 pages 1 Machiavelli and Lao-Tzu Compare and contrast leadership What is leadership? Leadership is the action of leading a group of people or an organization. Leaders help set direction and have management skills to guide their people. Leaders do this by applying their leadership aspects, such as beliefs, knowledge, and power. Lao-Tzu and Machiavelli both have contrasting focuses and opinions on how a ruler should govern and military action. The

Romeo & Juliet Compare and Contrast - English - Essay

579 words - 3 pages Karina Martinez 03/01/2018 Compare and Contrast Essay The well known story called Romeo and Juliet created by William Shakespeare, is about two young tennagers that fall in love but neither of their families want them together because, they are both rivals. Romeo came from a family named the Montagues and Juliet came from a family named the Capulets. Throughout the story Shakespeare creatively describes the love they have towards each other

9-11 Incident Compare And Contrast Assignment

392 words - 2 pages Free 9-11 Incident Compare and ContrastOn September 11th 2001 terrorists attacked both the Twin Towers and the Pentagon. They succeeded in destroying the Twin Towers buildings. There have been many significant events in American History. Two, which stand above the others as turning points for the United States, are Pearl Harbor and the assassination of J.F. Kennedy.Pearl Harbor changed the mindset of every American in the nation. It sent a message

Compare And Contrast Motivation Theories In Two Organisations

266 words - 2 pages SS5004 Assignment 1 with Marking Scheme Assignment 1 With reference to motivation theory, compare and contrast the management practices in two real life organisations. (At least one of these organisations must be a voluntary / community sector organisation). approximate word count Percentage of Mark Introduction to the paper 100 5% Background to the organisation 1 100 5% Background to the organisation 2 100 5% Key

Compare and Contrast Essay (Jack/Lady Macbeth) - English - Essay

620 words - 3 pages Compare and Contrast Essay Edmund Burke once said, “Ambition can creep as well as soar.” This quote aptly captures both Jack and Lady Macbeth’s application of ambition. The allure of influence and power is so great that it corrupts their logical ways of thinking, ultimately leading them to disaster. If Jack and Lady Macbeth were to compare with each other, then both primarily represent the “id” side of human condition but at the same time they

Compare and contrast Essay on High School v. Community College

595 words - 3 pages in high school, you are responsible for turning in work and attending, both are regulated and enforced by teachers along with laws set by the state. On a college campus, the student alone is responsible for attending, turning in their work and are not held to punishment like public high schools are. In contrast, high schools provide punishment for a student’s inability to abide to their rules and requirements and college students are faced to

Baby driver vs 21 compare and contrast - uc davis - essay

1161 words - 5 pages girlfriend because he understands how it feels like to be in love. In contrast, Rosa stays the same until the end of the movie. He keeps his greediness and desire to obtain more money. In both films, the characters show a dramatic need to protect themselves and to mature enough to know how to wheel this skill they were given too early in life. Money is a dominating factor in both Baby Driver and 21. In both cases, this dramatic need is manifested in

Compare, contrast and evaluate positivism and constructivism - University of Nottingham - Essay

2016 words - 9 pages Compare, contrast and evaluate positivism and constructivism in terms of their ontology, epistemology and methodology. This essay will explore the ontology, epistemology and methodology used in Positivism and Constructivism. Positivists believed in a universal approach to both social science and natural science. They believe empiricism is critical, and by establishing causal relationships and developing models, social science is measurable

Compare and contrast Mask of Anarchy and We are Seven - Degree Level 2 - Assignment

2560 words - 11 pages Part 2 Compare and contrast extracts from William Wordsworth’s poem ‘We are Seven’ and Percy Bysshe Shelley’s poem ‘The Mask of Anarchy: Written on the Occasion of the Massacre at Manchester’ The first poem being compared for this assignment is ‘We are Seven’, (Wordsworth, cited in The Open University, 2018, a) written as part of Wordsworth’s Lyrical Ballad’s. It presents the dialogue of a man, the narrator, and a little girl who the man is

Compare And Contrast Wilfred Owen's 'Futility' And Thom Gunn's 'The Reassurance'

2044 words - 9 pages Free Gunn's 'The Reassurance' and Owen's 'Futility' are thematically apt for comparison as they both focus on death. They will be interesting to compare regarding the causes of death- AIDS and war- being natural or man-made.Structurally, the poems are similar on the page, both being split up into stanzas. Their different uses of rhyming techniques are also useful areas for comparison and contrast, one poet choosing half instead of full-rhyme and the

Venn Diagram of Compare and Contrast Art - Rasmussen College/Art Appreciation - Assighnment

1415 words - 6 pages forms of art. The similarities I researched and analyzed are what is most intriguing to me. I chose to compare and contrast these two media types because they seemed nothing but different to me in every way. So, it was a memorable research project, mostly because I found an array of similarities between drawing and sculpting that I didn’t expect to find. In the end, art is used mostly as an expression of passion and emotion. So, regardless of the

compare and contrast O’connors approach to religious expierience - american lit II - essay

838 words - 4 pages question came around when my brother was being born and my family asked me “Are you going to give your blanket to Max?”, Of course I said no. I was too in love with it to let it go, even at the age of nine it was my best friend. It was with me almost all the time unless I was going away. In the event of me not being able to find my blanket I would begin to have panic attacks. This didn’t happen often but when it did it it was definitely a big deal

Compare & contrast attachment and narrative family therapy - Family & Couples counselling - Essay

4193 words - 17 pages these experiential or ‘bottom up’ therapies consider insight to be the result rather than the means of therapeutic change, as opposed to cognitive ‘top down’ interventions. The focus of this paper is to compare and contrast two family therapy models within this evolutionary spectrum; attachment theory developed in the 1950s, and post modern narrative theory developed in the 1980s. Areas examined in relation to each orientation include

Compare And Contrast The Roman Catholic Church With The Baptist Church

1265 words - 6 pages pastor takes on the role of spiritual leadership, while a deacon serves as moderator of board meetings. A common practice is for each family to be assigned a specific deacon, to be the primary point of contact whenever a need arises. In contrast, the Pope is the Head of the Catholic Church; he is elected by the cardinals and remains Pope for life. After the Pope are the Cardinals, when a Pope passes away one of them is elected as the new pope

A time to kill and to kill a mockingbird - Holy Cross/ English 10 - compare and contrast essay

1051 words - 5 pages Gina Le Ms. Maliszewski English 10 Block D 22 May 2018 A Time to Kill and To Kill A Mockingbird Compare and Contrast Essay During the 1900’s, discrimination and prejudice spreaded throughout the United States. A great example of this would be Harper Lee’s Novel, “To Kill A Mockingbird”, and Joel Schumacher’s film, “A Time To Kill”. The novel “To Kill A Mockingbird” written by Harper Lee, and the film directed by Joel Schumacher, “A Time To Kill