This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Jury Essay

548 words - 3 pages

gentelmen of the jury, today i am going to prove to you that nazi have just as much right to march wherever they want to as do the homosexuals, african american communtiy, relihious belivers, along with any other community that as their right to speak their opinion in what they believe in as the united states dicatates to be constitutional under the first amendment. the first amendment provides us with the freedom of speech, the freedom of assembly, and the freedom to speak out in what we believe in. i am hear today to declare that any peaceful act of assembly is completley legal under the untied states constituion, the law of the land. if the nazi feel that it is necesary to speak out in ...view middle of the document...

the first amendment grants the nazis the right to be able to preacefully march for what they believe in. in this case, i will present the justice behind peaceful nazi assemblies that is legal even withen a jewich commity reguardless of the outside opininons through supreme court rulings and laws withen the us that has been declared to be constituional.the reason for marching in a jewish operationg communtiy is because the nazis believe that it would be most productive for them to march in fron of those people who they most directly wish to address. what would be the purpose of the nazi marching in fron of an audience that is not affected byt he cause. THERE WOULD BE NO POINT. the nazis in fact are not the factor of bringin about violenvce and destruction withen jewish comunties. the nazis are PEACFULLY showing their target audiece. today i am here to present this case to the jury by showing that the nazis can and legally be able to peacfully march in jewish communties. the actions of a minute percentage of extremeists should not be applied to the group as a whole. overall, the majority of the nazi group should be allowed to peacfully march in any community jewish based or not. if nazis are prohibited from their peacfull asemblies, they may in fact feel the need to demonstrate in violence and other disturbing mehtods as any other group might be promted to do. People are going to do wut they believe in wheather it is right or wrong. Why not make it ok for them to be able to express their opinions in a manner of peace rather than not be able to and be forced into proving their point through means of violence

Other Essays On Jury

Court Cases Essay

295 words - 2 pages Good morning your honor and ladies and gentlemen of the jury. My name is Aaron Faullin and I will represent the defendant today. The defendant is not a constant problem in the home, in school, or in society. The defendant walked into Publix and stole an item. We as the defense realize this. The defendant realizes this as does the prosecution. However, the prosecution will also try to stress the fact that this young man is some type of delinquent

Compares Justice In BILLY BUDD, And TWELVE ANGRY MEN

639 words - 3 pages Changing VerdictsThe trials in both Billy Budd and Twelve Angry Men have a 'jury' of sorts, and in each story, the members of these juries are virtually unanimous in their decision, but one person remains who would vote against his/her fellow jurors. As it happens, both juries completely change the verdict from what it appeared each jury would have originally voted. I hope to show you the similarities/differences of these two stories by exposing

The Fifth Amendment is an old friend and a good friend. Do you agree or disagree with that assessment of the Fifth Amendment? Why?

471 words - 2 pages system towards those being tried.The Fifth Amendment basically states five of a somewhat related yet diverse nature. "No person shall be held to answer for a capita, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger." This basically means everyone has a right to be tried before a jury of

Sheppard v. Maxwell, Warden. 3S4 U.S. 333, S6 S.Ct. 1507, 16 L.Ed.2d 600 (1966)

445 words - 2 pages counsel to be heard. Sheppard was found guilty and his appeals to the state courts of appeal, as well as the Supreme Court, were denied. In 1965, Sheppard hired F. Lee Bailey, who decided to institute a writ of habeas corpus.Question: Was Sheppard denied due process of law by the editorials published by the Cleveland newspapers and the unsequestered jury of the Cleveland courts?Held: Yes, Sheppard was denied due process of law by the editorials

Explain Why The Adversary System Of Trial Is The Best System For Achieving Justice In Criminal Trials?

1168 words - 5 pages Explain why the adversary system of trial is the best system for achieving justice in criminal trials?The adversary system of trial is the best system for achieving justice in criminal trials for a number of different reasons. The use of a jury, the standard of evidence relied upon and the standard of proof, the cross-examining of witnesses and the ability to plead guilty, contribute greatly to reaching justice in the adversary system. They are

Film Review Of "To Kill A Mockingbird"

535 words - 3 pages Racial discrimination is a major theme within the film "To Kill a Mockingbird" when Tom Robinson, a man of African heritage, is falsely accused of raping a young white girl. His attorney, a white man named Atticus Finch, gives solid evidence in Tom's favour, but the jury still finds Tom guilty and he is sent to prison. I believe that this famous film adapted from an even more famous book effectively communicates its message with an entertaining

Ancient Greece - what did they ever do for you?

498 words - 2 pages vote for laws, or make a statement. The only unfair thing about this version was that women could not vote or have anything to do with government.2) Trial by Jury was a very important thing in courts. When a man was brought to the courtroom, people (I'm Ancient Rome they had as many as 500) would vote to see if the man was guilty or innocent. Jurors are paid, and rich or poor could be them.3) Theater was something that people saw daily. A comedy was

Why Was Socrates Found Guilty? Was He Fairly Tried

2988 words - 12 pages of his own; he is further guilty of corrupting the young."" Facing these charges in 399 BC Socrates was brought to trial, with the prosecution led by Meletus and his two sunêgoroi (supporting prosecutors), Lycon and Anytus (a powerful politician). A jury of 501 found him guilty by a narrow margin and he was subsequently sentenced to death. But was it a just decision? The greatest problem faced in the study of Socrates is that Socrates never

Case Brief

538 words - 3 pages manslaughter; he argues that it was self-defense and that the jury was not properly instructed on the stand your ground ruling in self-defense. The jury says that since he had an opportunity to get away, that deadly force was not needed, and it was no longer self-defense.The court disagrees, they stated that in Rhode Island the statute pertaining to self-defense states that if you have the opportunity to flee without being harmed, then you have no

The Magna Carta By: Tyler Giacopelli

391 words - 2 pages Magna Carta also said that all free men can get a fair trial with a jury of their peers. In addition, the Magna Carta gave nobles some say in the government. Over the course of fifty years, this grew into the idea of parliament. Parliament is a group of advisers to the English king. The other way the Magna Carta affected the monarchs rule was by making them more powerful. The Magna Carta made the monarchs more powerful by giving the nobles some

12 Angry Men - Critical Thinkers

1460 words - 6 pages The Jury Who Had To Use Thinking SkillsIn Twelve Angry Men, a young man is on trial for stabbing and killing his father. Themovie focuses on twelve randomly selected citizens who are assigned the duty ofdetermining the fate of this 19 year old man. The jury is supposed to examine certainfacts and determine the truth based solely on the evidence presented to them in court. It isassumed that the jurors will judge fairly and without personal bias

Similar Papers

Trial By Jury Essay

521 words - 3 pages Trial by Jury"Trial by jury" is a "trial by the country" In my opinion, trial by jury is the best way to achieve justice because rather than one man judging the accused there are 12 men who will be judging. In addition, trial by jury prevents oppression by the government. And finally, trial by jury is very beneficial in Canada, providing exceptionally fair and just trial.Elders used to say, 2 heads are better than one head. You can use this

Jury Of Her Peers Essay

410 words - 2 pages A Jury of Her Peers deals with the circumstances surrounding the death of a farmer, John Wright, who is found strangled in his bed. His wife is arrested for the murder with the story beginning the following day as the sheriff, the county attorney, the sheriff's wife, and a neighbor couple return to the Wrights' house. The women are there to pick out some clothes for the wife to wear while in prison and the men to investigate the crime scene.The

Ring V. Arizona Case Brief Essay

1533 words - 7 pages $271,681. They also recovered a letter with $575,995 written on the inside. This amount, when added to the amount of cash recovered, added up to the same amount that had been stolen from the armored van. A jury found Ring guilty of "murder occurring during an armed robbery". This decision was based on the evidence obtained by the police. In Arizona, this is a capital offence. The prosecution's case had no evidence that identified Ring as

Criminal Justice System Essay

1288 words - 6 pages jury of their peers. Now that phrase is open to a lot of interpretations. The dictionary defines peer as "one who is equal to another in rank, or merit or quality". Using that definition literally, what comes to mind is the potential makeup of a jury for a Fortune 500 CEO and that of your neighborhood dope dealer. Should the CEO have a jury composed of business leaders and chambers of commerce types while the dope dealer have twelve people from the